UK judges block action over US drone attacks in Pakistan
Lawyers for Noor Khan, 27, who lives in Pakistan, launched the action at the High Court in London in March after the death of his father Malik Daud Khan last year in a drone strike in North Waziristan.
They sought to challenge the lawfulness of the help Britain's intelligence gathering agency GCHQ reportedly provides to the CIA, such as information targeting militants, which is then used in deadly drone strikes.
However, lawyers for British Foreign Secretary William Hague had urged the court to block the legal proceedings, saying the case was unarguable.
They said it raised issues relating to sovereign foreign states that cannot be determined by English courts, adding that any ruling would have a "significant" impact on British relations with the United States and Pakistan.
Lord Justice Alan Moses refused Khan premission to bring the legal challenge at the High Court on Friday.
"The real aim is to persuade this court to make a public pronouncement designed to condemn the activities of the United States in North Waziristan, as a step in persuading them to halt such activity," he said.
The judge said lawyer Martin Chamberlain, who represented Khan in court, "knows he could not obtain permission overtly for such a purpose".
He added: "His stimulating arguments have been an attempt to shroud that purpose in a more acceptable veil."
The covert US attacks are unpopular in Pakistan, where the government criticises them as a violation of sovereignty, but US officials believe they are a vital weapon against militants.
According to a September 2012 US study, US drone strikes in Pakistan have killed far more civilians than the US has acknowledged, traumatised innocent tribesmen.
The study by Stanford Law School and New York University’s School of Law called for re-evaluation of the strategy, saying the number of “high-level” targets killed as a percentage of total casualties was extremely low – about 2%, according to CNN.
COMMENTS (10)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
1731916090-0/sabrina-(3)1731916090-0-165x106.webp "article")
Judges should not be allowed to do this. Anyone has the right to bring their grievances to the attention of the court, to deny this is to admit guilt and prohibit human rights.
Mischief is recognised by the court If jews are so powerfull then why not turn jewish?? People who live on charity from the west shouldnot throw tantrums
@Much Amused: Learn to stand on your own feet and may be the world will take some notice. The land of pure has been dependent on US aid and loans since its creation. The height of hypocrisy is biting the same hand that is feeding them. This is acountry with the lowest ratio of tax to GDP i.e. tax chor politicians, generals, bureaucrats, judges, media barons, and industrialists and they have the cheek to criticise the rest of the world.
drones kill all Pakistanis we dont want a country Pakistan on World map
“The real aim is to persuade this court to make a public pronouncement designed to condemn the activities of the United States in North Waziristan, as a step in persuading them to halt such activity,” Lord Justice Alan Moses said
You will meet the same fate every where, even at the most independent "International Court of Justice."
Noor Khan should now try it in Pakistan. The case should be bought before CJP.
P.S. CJP has so far not opened this case against drones because it knows it will ‘open a can of worms’. These ‘worms’ would not like to be named (as in the case of Abbaotabad). I rest my case, my Lord.
Bad luck it was heard by a jewish judge. Go to European court.
Pakistani High Courts and Supreme Court are much more powerful than English Court of UK.
I fear what sort of juctice the English Courts may be delivering to the English people?
Zaid Hamid and Hamid Gul must be very worried today.
Hamid Gul and Zaid Hamid must be very worried today.