The second issue is to restore harmony amongst key organs of the state such as the judiciary, executive, parliament and military as a subordinate arm of the elected government. These state organisations are repeatedly vying to enlarge their respective domains of power. This contention is creating instability within the state structure, which is weakening the capacity to fulfil its fundamental collective functions of establishing order and protection of the life and property of citizens. Since the legitimacy of the state is drawn from the fulfilment of these basic functions, weakened ability in this sphere fundamentally undermines the state.
The third issue is a rent-based economy where the resources and economic surpluses are extracted mainly for the ruling elite, who live in luxury in the face of mass poverty. Seventy per cent of the population is food insecure. The majority of the population is denied opportunities of quality education, decent healthcare facilities and access to productive assets through which they could hope for a better life and participate in the process of economic growth. The inherent injustice that is built into the very structure of the economy fuels a seething discontent. It is, therefore, necessary to change the institutional structure of the economy so that economic opportunities are opened to all citizens rather than a few.
The fourth issue is the penetration of extremist ideology into elements within the state apparatus, media, and some political parties. Consequently, the Pakistan project, as conceived by the founding fathers and which inspired two generations to hope and strive, is faltering. The idea of Pakistan was to build a democratic polity within a pluralist society. A society in which Muslims who had earlier felt constrained from pursuing their material and spiritual development would be able to actualise their human potential as much as other religious identities. The flowering of such a society would be fertilised by norms of tolerance and human solidarity.
Deep within the cultural diversity of this new country breathes the unifying sensibility of an ancient Sufi tradition: the apprehension that adoration, beauty and truth combine to constitute the ligament with God; that these transcendent modes of human consciousness are based on connecting with the human community. This connection with others opens the possibilities of love, freedom and creativity. All this now inhabits the silences of a society bludgeoned by bigotry, hatred and fear. It is these silences and the dormant potential they signify that the great contemporary Sufi poet Najam Hussain Syed suggests when he writes: “Somewhere on the slopes of silence, beat the drums of the unsaid”.
Extremists fear freedom. They are essentially divorced from a sense of beauty, wherein glows the being of human kind. Therefore, resisting extremism involves reconnecting with the wellsprings of our humanity: love, freedom and beauty. This requires a cultural struggle: art and literature that would revitalise the aesthetic sense. Social scientists, too, ought to develop a fresh interdisciplinary perspective for the human development of society. Thus, artists, poets and scientists could, by creating a counter-consciousness to the extremist mindset, initiate Pakistan’s renaissance.
Published in The Express Tribune, December 3rd, 2012.
COMMENTS (12)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Re-reading Abu-Uzhur, I am impressed.
But realize that 'feigned personal allegiance' of kings was only one aspect of social control. The actual, real allegiance of large numbers of people to sufi 'masters' - through formal processes of bay'ah (of taking bayt) and ritualized body and mind control - was the other. The Sufi thus was the key actor, the linchpin who penetrated the countryside and brought together secular and religious control over masses under one political unit.
That is the last thing that modern Pakistan should aim to reproduce.
The author makes a huge mistake in putting his eggs in the basket of 'sufism'.
South Asian Sufism had only two roles. Both were positives for Islam at that time but that time has long past.
Those two roles were -
(1) Expand the circle of Islam by offering vast masses of Hindus a way to find their way into the Light of Islam. These Hindus could not have understood or accepted the Holy Quran if they had been exposed to it directly.
(2) These converted and non-converted Hindu masses had to be controlled for Muslim sovereigns so the latter were not internally threatened as they lived in hostile environments.
Luckily, because of the nature of Hinduism, Sufism had phenomenal success. Some 'sufis' even thought they were promoting 'plurality' - although such sufis were few and far between. Such exceptions apart, Sufism cannot be Pakistan's future if it has to be a modern practical state. It also cannot satisfy the yearnings of educated Muslims who want to learn, know, and follow Islam.
A Well-informed read. Thanks Dr. Sahib!!
@ Abu Uzhur
"Did any sufi-saint ever denounce any king for their massacres,
plunder, rape , harems with thousands of sex slaves, and taking of tens of thousands of men women and children as slaves
and selling them in markets ?"
You have raised a very disturbing question , indeed . I hope we do have some satisfactory answer .
@sabi:
A half-hearted attempt is being made in Pakistan these days to promote sufism for
combating
militant , self-destruct brands of Islam . Don't expect any positive outcome . Sufism,
with all its emphasis on love and universal brotherhood of mankind , was primarily
a force for passivity , conformity , fatalism , acceptace of status quo , and negation of
self ( khudi ) . This suited the medieval kings . That is why the kings granted jagirs of
thousands of acres to our sufi-saints, and feigned personal allegiance to them .This was
all part of the statecraft .Did any sufi-saint ever denounce any king for their massacres,
plunder, rape , harems with thousands of sex slaves, and taking of tens of thousands of men women and children as slaves
and selling them in markets .?
Revival of sufistic thought is no solution to our malaise .
@Feroz: Yes Feroz ~~~~~~~~~~~~~the action needed is vital . Otherwise it is just coffee-table talk !!!!
Abu Azhar, you said it right. We need to first understand our history in its correct perspective.
The author fails to identify the source of problem and the actions needed to overcome them. There is a wish list and hope but sadly nations cannot progress without taking the right decisions, which mostly are hard decisions.
In addition educated and working women do not raise terrorist kids and suicide bombers.
@sabi: "All the sufis have never talked in their books of such things as what is being told today in the name of sufi Islam"
May I ask what books have you read on Sufism?
Sufi Islam is not a myth but practicle Islam which say no short cuts in life but sacrifices for purification of souls.Unfortunately bigots have associated sufism to celeberating urs and singing qwalis on shrines.Giving Taveez and claiming of making wali with one look is nothing but joke and fraud.All the sufis have never talked in their books of such things as what is being told today in the name of sufi Islam.We can fool ourself but not God.Religion is a matter between God and individual and not between individual to individual.Intrestingly people don't trust mullah for finacial purposes but trust him for taking care of their beliefs Imaan) which is much more than any worldly wealth.Unless people are not given access to true work of these great saints,bigots will continue to rule and expolit religion.Islam first asks sacrifice from an individual and then promises rewards.