Full cooperation between Islamabad and Washington is critical to US efforts to stabilise Afghanistan before most Nato combat troops withdraw by 2014.
"There was a fairly difficult patch and I think we've moved away from that into a positive trajectory," Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar told Reuters in an interview, referring to Pakistani-US relations.
"We are coming closer to developing what could be common positions. We wish to see a responsible transition in Afghanistan."
Relations between the uneasy allies were severely strained by a series of incidents in 2011. The crisis in ties began when a CIA contractor shot dead two men he suspected of trying to rob him in the city of Lahore.
Months later, US special forces killed Osama bin Laden in a raid and kept the Pakistan military in the dark, humiliating the country's most powerful institution.
Then a Nato air raid mistakenly killed 24 Pakistani soldiers on the Afghan border in November that year.
In response, Pakistan expelled US military trainers and CIA agents and placed limits on the numbers of visas given to US diplomatic personnel.
Pakistan, which relies heavily on American aid, also closed supply routes for trucks carrying supplies to US-led Nato forces in Afghanistan.
Now, Khar said, relations were fully repaired, including military and intelligence contacts.
"We are having very useful, deep conversations with the US," she said, as the two countries try to find common ground on Afghanistan ahead of the scheduled 2014 pullout.
‘Unreliable partner’
Both the United States and Afghanistan have long regarded Pakistan as an unreliable partner in the drive to bring stability to Afghanistan, accusing Pakistan's intelligence agency of backing Afghan insurgent groups.
Pakistan denies that.
Pakistan recently released mid-level Afghan Taliban prisoners to help facilitate peace talks between the militant group and the Kabul government, the clearest sign it was committed to advancing Afghan reconciliation.
Khar said Islamabad was willing to take further steps but would not say whether that would include releasing senior Afghan Taliban figures, like the former second in command, Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar.
"I think it is important that we have intensive engagement on what needs to be done," she said.
Afghan officials think Baradar may be one of the few commanders with the stature to bring elements of the Taliban into peace talks after more than a decade of war.
During a recent visit to Pakistan by members of the Afghan High Peace Council, Pakistan agreed to release some prisoners, although not Baradar, and to provide safe passage for those wishing to enter talks, Khar said.
Pakistan would also encourage Afghan insurgents to enter into direct talks with President Hamid Karzai's government. So far, there have been only contacts.
"For us in Pakistan today, the most important capital in the world is Kabul," said Khar, because instability there could spill over into Pakistan, and fuel its own Taliban insurgency.
She said the Afghan and Pakistan governments were discussing ways to strengthen military cooperation.
Currently, relations are strained. Afghanistan still suspects elements in Pakistan of supporting the Taliban, despite denials from Islamabad. The Pakistan military, pursing Pakistani insurgents, has also shelled villages across the border in Afghanistan, prompting protests.
Closer ties with India
In addition to improving ties with Afghanistan, Khar said Pakistan also wanted to pursue closer ties with arch-rival India.
The United States has long believed that Pakistan would focus more closely on helping it pacify Afghanistan if relations with India improved.
The nuclear-armed neighbours have fought three wars since their independence from British rule in 1947 and are at loggerheads over the status of the disputed territory of Kashmir.
"The Pakistani leadership has shown a great willingness to move forward, sometimes at the cost of losing some political capital, because sometimes improving ties with India might not be the most popular thing to do," said Khar.
Many Pakistani politicians blame India for Pakistan's insurgencies or spiralling crime rate, saying their wealthier, more populous neighbour wants to weaken Pakistan.
India, in turn, blames Pakistan for sending militants to infiltrate Kashmir over several decades and suspects Pakistan of shielding those behind a 2008 attack on Mumbai that left 166 people dead. India executed the only surviving perpetrator in their custody, a young Pakistani man, last week.
That should be an opportunity for the two countries to put the attack behind them and move forward, said Khar. Their warming relations recently resulted in an agreement easing trade and travel restrictions.
"We are clear that we want Pakistani-India relations to move forward swiftly," she said.
COMMENTS (18)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
These statements from the Foreign Minister of Pakistan show how far we’ve come in regards to developing a healthy partnership between our nations. It is obvious that we strongly value each other’s assistance and hope to benefit through mutual cooperation. There is no reason why we should not be optimistic about the future of our relationship. We are fighting a common war, and it only makes sense for us to cooperate and coordinate against our common enemies. We hope to build on our improving relationship, and work closely for the sake of negating the common threat that’s preventing us from bringing peace and stability to the region.
Hurrah -- Pak's relations with U.S. are "completely repaired". Now Pak can beg for more money and put it in the Swiss (or, may be, Dubai or London) bank accounts of corrupt politicians, militarymen, mullahs and other thugs. We paid tax-payer's billions to your lead criminal Pervez Musharraf and now we have to pay the others waiting in line. Again, a big hurrah! Long live the "land of the pure".
@Plal:
"@Reader: Pakistan has got ~ $70Billion since its Independence from USA and all that fund was not coalition support fund that you are listing here."
Actually, if you adjust for inflation the actual doleout to Pakistan has been in excess of $250B.
Remember, Pakistan has been getting free dollars and military equipment in billions of dollars since the early fifties.
"US, Pakistan ties fully repaired: Khar"
Those are code words for getting paid billions of American dollars.
@BILL:
Sure make your problems and leave them on someone else. So what exactly is next item on your list? Another war with someone then you can complain to another nation about your "tax" dollars?
@Cautious:
We didn't go to war, we were 'dragged' to war. If you do some research, in Musharraf's days he was told either join us to be bombed back to stone age. We had little to none terrorism before getting involved in WoT. And I honestly feel its a shame to spoon feed you on how providing weapons, funds to a group, readying them for war against soviets is not an active partnership in creating the Taliban virus. And what exactly do you mean recruiting? You mean to say that Pakistan and saudis recruited these one time farmers to fight for their country. Very touching.
@Reader: Pakistan has got ~ $70Billion since its Independence from USA and all that fund was not coalition support fund that you are listing here.BTW,If Pakistan is partner with International community, in pursuance of UN resolution- in war against terror- why it needs fund from USA to fight the war in its own territory,there are 48 country fighting in Afghanistan-who is funding them?.Taliban Government was recognised by Pakistan not by USA or its allies.
@Reader
So you went to war for money - that about sum it up? Suspect the American's don't think they got much for their money as you only had one significant offensive in 10+ years and that was largely a PR show which didn't kill/capture anyone of consequence. As far as your allegation that the USA created the Taliban maybe you can explain how a bunch of white Christians recruited a bunch of Muslims to go on jihad? A more accurate statement might say that the USA provided some weapons and related training to Jihadis recruited by Pakistan and the Saudi's - and that was 30 years ago - those guys are either retired or dead.
@Reader: Don't care for what it's for. I just want it to stop. I want us out of there and you guys can deal with those crazy zelots yourself.
Means passwords of Uncle Sam's ATM and Pentagon store locks have been received.
@BILL:
I want to clear the ignorant people who keep talking about their "tax" money going to other countries.
Its the money to repay for Pakistan army joining your war using their own ammo and fuel, resources, wages of soldiers to kill Taliban your country once created and now wants to kill.
Its the money to repair and pay to the people who repair roads extensively used to take your supplies from Karachi to Afghanistan.
Please don't talk about your tax money when you have no idea why its being given to other countries.
Fully ready to serve the masters once again..
"US, Pakistan ties fully repaired: Khar" means what?
What is the ration of repaired relations?
Is US at 98% and Pakistan on 2% or US is at 95% and Pakistan on 5%?
The relations between Pakistan MUST be on 50% - 50%. And if that is the ratio than it seems to be okay.
But what about the US drone attacks?
Did Khar was able to convince US not to jeopardize our sovereignty?
Killing innocent Pakistanis at the cost of stablising Afghanistan is not a good foreign policy Mrs. Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar.
I better say my shukraanay ke nafil !
Fully repaired must not include things like trust, mutual respect, or even liking each other.
So, which components were replaced? :)
Means we have fully accepted their slavery and sold the blood of martyrs in return of aid which will go into the bank accounts of these politicians...:(