Bilawal gets rousing welcome in Dadu

Thousands of people came out on the streets to greet the PPP chairperson, excited to catch a glimpse of BB's son.


Shuhab Janwari/adam Mengal November 19, 2012
Bilawal gets rousing welcome in Dadu

DADU:


In a style reminiscent of his grandfather and mother, the chairperson of Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP), Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, visited Dadu, Sindh, and chanted ‘Jeay Bhutto’ as he met party workers, who eagerly swarmed around his car as it travelled through their neighbourhoods.


Thousands of people came out on the streets to greet the PPP chairperson, excited that they would finally catch a glimpse of Benazir Bhutto’s son.

This was Bilawal’s first visit to Dadu. He visited several towns of the district, including Bhan Saeedabad, Radhan, Phulji Station and Pyaro Goth. At Zardari House in Radhan, he said that he was certain that PPP would win the next election with a majority.

Hundreds of people roared at the confidence with which he made this claim. “Do not fall for the propaganda that you are being fed by the anti-PPP elements. The PPP has popular support across Pakistan.” He claimed that the PPP would form the government.

Published in The Express Tribune, November 19th, 2012.

COMMENTS (29)

Hamid Hassan Khan | 12 years ago | Reply

@ap: off course

map | 12 years ago | Reply

PK- in other words are u trying to say ppl who are reading this newspaper are not educated?! Or you seriously believe PPP or Bilawal only has the support of 'Dadu' thats all? What world are you living in buddy? By the way FYI PPP is not the only party which exists in interior Sindh.. These poor people have the right to vote for any party they like and there must be a reason they would vote for them. Maybe if u ever visited these places u would know what Im exactly talking about. My suggestion is if you think you're 'educated' enough then you should definitely vote for someone else.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ