Talks with the Taliban

After years of fighting, US & Afghan officials have reached the conclusion that a deal with Taliban is the only way.


Editorial November 16, 2012

The efforts of Afghan officials lobbying for the release of Afghan Taliban members, held in Pakistan, has resulted in the latter freeing 13 such persons. More releases are likely after the ones made on November 14, including those of former Taliban justice minister Mullah Turabi and a former Taliban second-in-command, Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar.

These Taliban figures were reportedly released after negotiations between Islamabad officials and the Afghan High Peace Council. The most senior of those released is thought to be a former militant commander from eastern Afghanistan, though reports also say that three ex-Taliban governors have been released as well. The council has been engaged in attempting to negotiate a peace deal with the Taliban for months, but has not had much success. It has insisted that the major reason for this has been that the majority of the senior leaders have been held captive in Pakistan. After years of fighting, both the US and Afghan officials appear to have reached the conclusion that a deal struck with the Afghan Taliban is the only way to secure peace in a territory that remains inherently unstable, with militant activity on the increase. The concern, of course, is for the future of Afghanistan after the withdrawal of US forces at the end of 2014 — a date that is not too far.

But there is some irony in all this. Pakistan has repeatedly come under attack from both the US and Kabul for backing militant elements but it could well argue that it, too, has adopted such measures for the sake of maintaining peace in its country. After all, Pakistan needs calm just as badly as Afghanistan does. The issue is becoming a highly complex one. In principle, negotiating with militants, as Kabul is doing, is a dangerous game. They have never proved very trustworthy in the past and handshakes tend to slip after a while. Pakistan has already dealt with this strategy of the Taliban. The two countries need to work together to combat militancy, and perhaps, devise a common strategy to do so.

Published in The Express Tribune, November 17th, 2012.

COMMENTS (7)

sultan ahmed | 11 years ago | Reply

The concern, of course, is for the future of Afghanistan after the withdrawal of US forces at the end of 2014 — a date that is not too far.

Refusal to release lady doctor convicted by the court for more than 80 years,notwithstanding the fact that she is innocent committed no such crime as produced in the court,no crime weapon recovery no medical certificate of any injured person but convicted and sentenced.

On the other hand, Cuba prison is filled with many innocents, peace negotiations are going on. Pakistan has released number of Taliban leaders as a goodwill gesture but on the contrary,United States looks not in mood to show any leniency in its policy in this regard. This behave,creat some reservations regarding its early withdrawal from the land locked Afgghanistan.

Hasan Mehmood | 11 years ago | Reply I am deeply skeptic of any peace negotiations with Taliban. They simply dont believe in power sharing. I challenge all and sundry to prove me wrong and make my day. The absolute maximum they can concede is safe passage for USA/NATO forces and some sort of commitment to rein in Al Qaeda from attacking / planning attacks on western targets.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ