Sino-pak relations: Pakistan, China to solve issues mutually

"Bilateral trade crossed the $10 billion mark while Pakistan exports to China increased by 54%", says Liu Jian.


Ppi October 29, 2012

ISLAMABAD:


Ambassador of the People’s Republic of China to Pakistan Liu Jian said that Pakistan’s development “is our progress and difficulties of Islamabad are our problem which we will mutually overcome soon.”


He said that investment climate in Pakistan was very good while government was providing best possible security to investors therefore no Chinese entrepreneur was worried to come to Pakistan.

The envoy was speaking to the local business community and Chinese Pakistanis at the house of Muhammad Raza Khan, former chairman coordination of Federation of Pakistan Chamber of Commerce and Industry (FPCCI).

Cooperation and trade between Islamabad and Beijing was increasing, bilateral trade crossed the $10 billion mark while Pakistan exports to China increased by 54%, said Jian. He said that China was working on 120 projects in Pakistan.

Published in The Express Tribune, October 30th, 2012.

 

COMMENTS (9)

realist | 11 years ago | Reply

In another event, India, China, Singapore, Japan and other East Asian countries join hands to (re) establish Nalanda International University in Bihar.

Sultan Ahmed | 11 years ago | Reply

No doubt, China is a dependable friend of Pakistan,not like others playing with our sovereignty and creat counter productive

Fact of the day is that, we are not in position to hold illegal enterence of chines product in Pakistan which is badly effected Pakistan's economy.

Bilateral trade between the two countries must be legalised.Import and Export institutions should play a vital role in this matter.

Pakistan facing remarkable power shortfall our official concerned should move forward in this connection so that we may be able to overcome existing energy crisis in the country.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ