With the US elections just round the corner, public opinion in Pakistan regarding the better presidential choice for the White House is also shaping up. Most Pakistanis realize that the outcome of the US elections will have a direct and indirect impact on the state of affairs in their homeland.
The two countries share a close but complicated relationship, which has gone through several ups-and-downs, especially during the last year due to issues like drone attacks, the Salala incident and the outrage over the blasphemous film. Anti-American sentiments have been on a rise amongst the general population and a vast majority of Pakistanis are extremely critical not only of American policy, but also of President Obama.
A PEW survey in June showed that currently 7% of Pakistanis favor Obama, which is even lower than the popularity of President Bush in the last year of his term.
“During Obama’s presidency, there have been a lot of drone strikes and a lot of interference in our internal affairs,” says Mohibullah Siando, a student from Karachi. However, if given a choice between the two candidates Siando preferred Obama, as the risk of an unknown candidate was far too great.
Ghulam Farid, a government servant also agrees that Obama would be a more favorable option. He admitted that a while lot of Obama’s policies regarding Pakistan have backfired, there have also been positive developments during his term like the revolutions in countries like Libya and Egypt.
“People in Pakistan who blame Obama and America for things like drones forget that these attacks take place with the tacit agreement of the Pakistani government,” he added.
However, not everyone views another term under President Obama as a favorable sign.
Bushra, a housewife staunchly opposes the idea of Obama being re-elected. She blames Obama for allowing the release of offensive content like the blasphemous film.
“If Obama comes to power again, such films will continue to be made and we cannot allow that,” she said.
A new poll conducted by the BBC World Service on 24th October 2012 has also revealed that Pakistan was the only overseas country of those polled which preferred Republican US Presidential candidate Mitt Romney. According to the poll, Pakistanis gave both US presidential candidates less than 20% approval, but Romney led by a narrow margin.
Faraz Ahmed, a research executive at a multinational company is one of those who think Romney should be given a chance.
“Obama had four years and he failed in multiple ways, it’s time to see what the other party has to offer,” said Ahmed.
Amidst those who take clear sides, there are also those who believe that there will be no change in American policy towards Pakistan regardless of who comes to power.
“An individual cannot bring about change. Their policies towards Pakistan will remain what they are,” adds Basit Zahoor, another business owner.
With the approach of general elections in Pakistan as well, there is a general consensus that the next few months will be critical for Pak-US relations.
“It would help Pakistan much more if they think and debate their own policies and actions rather than looking for a new man to blame in America,” said Taimoor Ali, a student from Karachi.
COMMENTS (10)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Because their policies are same and change of president shall never effect and change the US' policies regarding Pakistan and drones' strikes on Pakistani tribal areas as their smile on their faces is showing and proving......
@Zeux: What makes you think that Romney will cooperate any more with Pakistan than Obama has?? Judging by politicians' words, which mean nothing, Romney is FAR more likely to stop any aid to Pak and to widen the use of drones without even consulting your gov. I cant understand why any Pakistanis [other than your money grubbing politicians] consider the USA an ally. The truth is that Pakistan is despised by the USA gov and its people. If you read any USA media, you would know that you do not have any 'friends' in the USA. The only thing that the candidates agree on is that Pak should be droned continually. You should ally with your neighbors. At least then you would have some regional support and strength to counteract USA influence. Romney thinks Islam is devil worship and every Muslim is a crazed jihad terrorist. At least Obama is somewhat more sane.
Mum and Dad are equaly responsible . To give the birth of the two serveyed students from Karachi . PEW and BBC has presented an authentic report . A servey by AKT news agency finds that 20% still wants to support s Mush jee or his no clandestine policy ,he did it openly . Solution lies in youths . And they are supporting Obama in one way or the other and so is with our Mush jee .
Why Obama is unpopular among Pakistani masses is due to the following reasons: 1. They really know nothing about Obama except his Drone Policy. 2. The sitting Pakistani govt. has been unable to praise Obama's pro-democracy stand after being hushed up by the powerful quarters over Kerry-Luger Bill. Like Obama, majortiy Pakistanis don't know about Romney and what policies he would take if he gets elected. I am pretty convinced that people belonging to the 'powerful' clan in Pakistan would like Romney because he would support 'any' form of government in Pakistan as long as it is in US interest and, unlike Obama, would not stand for democracy in Pakistan.
This sounds like a truant child when disciplined thinks both - Mum and Dad are equally bad.
Will Pakistan ever think what it can do to improve relations with its biggest DONOR?
This is about what is good for American people not what is bad for Pakistanis.
Probably everyone else would be as bad ... How about checking ourselves ? May be the fault lies with us ...
We know both are bad. Obama is a serious disappointment. I think Romney would be some change as he said he would co operate with Pakistan unlike Obama