The negative space between the white enamel of a chipped tooth is my daily reminder of that incident. After staring hard enough, the abstract profile of the chipped tooth edge takes shape — different things, at different times, but I usually see a gun muzzle. The emotion, however, is always the same: a visceral hatred for abusive authority figures. In painting, negative space is the space existing between and around the subject image. Negative space is clearly visible when the space around the subject forms an artistically relevant shape. This refers to our cognitive ability to separate the compositional elements within a painting based on contrast, separating those elements that are dark from those which are light. What one sees in this negative space fully depends on the viewer and not necessarily on the item itself.
There is a lot of negative space that exists in Pakistan. Malala Yousufzai blogged of a country where education would prevail. That thought was deemed threatening enough to make her a Taliban target. The fact that Malala was shot in the head for it is tragic but is now a foregone conclusion. As a nation, Pakistan is a rotating carousel of tragedy. Malala’s story is only the latest, with countless others before her. Now, the only fact remaining is how Pakistan should deal with the Taliban. Malala’s desire to go to school brought hope to thousands of marginalised girls living in parts of Pakistan where the Taliban are openly supported. Unanimously educating girls with the full backing of the state would send the Taliban and their sympathisers a clear message, shining a light on prejudices and cavernous educational deficiencies.
Picasso’s painting, “Guernica”, is considered a masterpiece in its use of negative space. The painting uses the colour black, misshapen figures and a sense of turmoil to effectively portray the tragedy of war. The negative spaces in the painting focus the viewer on the tormented figures, making the scene ever more violent and horrifying.
The fact that the Taliban would shoot a 15-year-old in the head is horrifying. The bullet entered Malala’s head, tunnelling past her jaw and embedded itself above her shoulder blade. She is recuperating in the United Kingdom, where she was flown to for specialised treatment. It remains to be seen whether she returns to Pakistan. Regardless, Malala’s heroism emphasises that education has the ability to shape societies for the better. Desmond Tutu nominated the young girl for the International Children’s Peace Prize. The Taliban targeted her because they felt she was an outspoken opponent, promoting “Western thinking” and female education. Her blogs describe a world of “terrified classmates, who were forced to hide books under shawls, living in fear of having acid thrown in their faces”.
Picasso once said, “Everything you can imagine is real.” Let us hope then all that Malala imagined, unequivocally, for a country where education and rights for all girls and women prevail, becomes real.
Published in The Express Tribune, October 25th, 2012.
COMMENTS (10)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Pir Bulleh Shah: "Can someone explain to me why shooting Malala in the head is so much worse than shooting so many other girls of her age and younger elsewhere?"
Because Malala in the past also stood against the Taliban ideology/ diktat openly and encouraged other girls for education while other girls did not/ could not display the similar courage.
@Pir Bulleh Shah: I don't think it is at all implied that shooting malala is worse than shooting any other girl or human. @author:I agree with you that an absence is as telling as a presence, and one often neglects to understand its significance. Whether or not the Taliban are now 'dealt' with is the big question. What is absent with regards to that question is unfortunately still the conviction/understanding that the Taliban have it wrong and why
@Pir B Shah::Your concern is quite genuine as all the girls of her age that are killed are precious.Why such a hue and cry for Malala only is not understandable.There is something fishy about the whole affair.I am sure they did not mean to kill her because,as you can see,she was targeted at the 'least used part' of the body-those who shot her seldom use it-and Malala insisted that that part of the body should be developed through education.She paid the price for her wrong thinking.
Taliban represent the ugly religiousness of society doing every evil deed wrongly in the name of Islam. Malala is the symbol of courage and resistance in the face of this evil phenomenon. If a 15 year old girl can stand up to Taliban's evil then I am confident they are doomed and their days are numbered. Pakistan has a massive progressive population which unfortunately is staying silent. Malala's incident is a wake up call to our collective conscience.
Can someone explain to me why shooting Malala in the head is so much worse than shooting so many other girls of her age and younger elsewhere?
@author::I understand the vision of Malala very well.the agony she went through in pursuit for education is a hallmark for generations to come.I thank you for introducing the vision of Picasso so beautifully.To me his paintings prior to reading your article were just an abstract art but now I can understand them better.Very good analogy,I must say
Using Picasso's "Guernica" as a comparison is unfortunately flying way above the average local philistine's head. I'm afraid that few will understand the point the writer is trying to make.
Only a "human" in a very deep consensus trance as a result of severe indoctrination could believe killing a girl for any reason is a good thing. Learn more from the YouTube video, "Malala to Madonna: Narrowing the Gap"
The main thought conveyed regarding Malala's incident was good but on the whole I thought this was somewhat disjointed.