
Foreign policy has barely been a blip in this election both because of the tiny substantive difference between President Obama and Romney and also because elections are settled on economic, not international, issues. In that regard, it will be of little significance that President Obama was clearly superior in this debate. Most polls still show him with a minuscule lead but the gains Romney made after his commanding performance in the first debate have stuck for the most part. The election is too close to call and may just come down to the results in a single state or two, with the battleground state of Ohio being of particular importance.
For Pakistan, it will make very little difference which candidate ultimately wins the election. Traditionally, Republicans have maintained warmer ties and given more aid to Pakistan but have also been more comfortable dealing with our military dictators. That history will not matter too much, though, since there is a bipartisan consensus in Washington that Pakistan is brimming with rogue actors and that a military option, in the form of drone strikes, is completely necessary. The military and civilian governments will breathe a sigh of relief after both candidates rejected the debate moderator’s proposal that the US “divorce” Pakistan. The aid spigots will remain even if there is a change of guard in Washington.
Published in The Express Tribune, October 24th, 2012.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ