The media has also reported that India has stopped work on the controversial Kishanganga Dam being built on the Neelum Jhelum River, in compliance with the International Court of Arbitration’s stay order. If indicative of a more conciliatory attitude, it would be warmly received here, especially as the water issue has become a major concern in Pakistan.
These are all positive steps that have encouraged more frequent exchanges between various groups, generally referred to as ‘peace lobbies’, thus reducing the hostility so very palpable only a few years ago. This change has also been well received by the major powers who have long expressed their unhappiness and frustration at the inability of the two South Asian neighbours to resolve their differences and usher in durable and sustainable peace. These developments have also been warmly welcomed by people in both countries, many of whom have never been enthusiastic about the policy of hostility pursued by their governments. In fact, if the political leaderships had been permitted by their respective ‘establishments’ the kind of freedom they should have had, the two countries may have arrived at a more cordial and constructive relationship decades ago, even if some of the ‘core issues’ had remained unresolved. But it is never too late to do the right thing.
It was now expected that these initiatives would promote mutual trust and confidence, enabling the political leaderships to take on the more contentious issues that have bedevilled relations for far too long. However, an element of uncertainty continues to hang over the bilateral ties and this relates to India’s hesitancy to move beyond small steps. The purpose is not to question Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s sincerity but to point out that while care and caution are advisable — given the tortured history of relations — a degree of imagination and resolve are essential as well.
Of course, one also has to recognise that apart from India’s lingering misgivings about Pakistan’s ‘intentions’, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh is handicapped by the peculiar arrangement wherein party president Mrs Sonia Gandhi retains the final say on all critical matters. His government’s image, too, has been tarnished because of the corruption scandals swirling around people in government and party. Moreover, the expectation that Rahul Gandhi will be able to resurrect the party’s popularity has not been met either. These have greatly emboldened the Bharatia Janata Party, encouraging it to oppose initiatives to improve relations with Pakistan — ironic, given that Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee prided himself on having co-authored both the Lahore and Islamabad Declarations. On the other hand, there is a rare consensus among stakeholders in Pakistan regarding relations with India. The government enjoys the main opposition party’s support in this effort. It is in this context that one has to express a degree of disappointment at the Indian government’s failure to demonstrate the requisite degree of resolve and determination in pushing for a more meaningful approach to the normalisation process. The stakes are huge and both sides have to remain equally committed to sustaining current momentum.
Published in The Express Tribune, October 24th, 2012.
COMMENTS (20)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Lala Gee: " Look around, each and every neighboring country of India is unhappy with India " This incessant Pakistani refrain on "unpopularity" of India amongst its neighours is senseless. India does not need votes or approval of any one of its neighours. So, why would she bother if they are individually or collectively dissatisfied with her? Besides, how does just that fact benefit Pakistan or any of its neighours. Has it so far? Of course, we would like to have friendly relations with everyone. But if it is not on the cards, so be it. Go, take your business elsewhere!
The main issue is to move forward. If you start scratching the past then we have to recall Indian role in separation of East pakistan and Indian refusal to give pajkistan its due share at the Time of partition. What most Indians refuse to acknowledge was that in Mumbai terrorism, Pakistan Government or even ISI had no role although individual help may be Possible. This tragic incident was planned by people who wanted India and Pakistan to go into war over this and thus extremists can consolidate thier hold. In my opinon although Partition of Subcontinent in 1947 was a tragedy but there is absolutely no need or desire to go back in Past. There is however genuine desire in people of both countries to live peacefully and as good neighbours and share the blessings of heritage we share in common such as URDU/ Hindi poetry music, movies , love of cricket etc. With changing world and times the desire of improving in relation ship between the two countrie is not in isolation but as part of a broader creation of global village which is having its impact in the region. India being much bigger contry and more stable presently is expected to take more leads. It is true that Presently Pakistan is going through a difficult time and India has an upper hand but Pakistan was doing much better than India from 47 to early eighties. Pakistan will soon rise back given its immense potential and resources. Pakistani public has learned a lot from its past and there is a genuine desire to have friendship with India but it should not be taken as weakness or begging.Both countries have survived independently even having adverserial relationship so far
Sir, i went over this article twice and a couple of questions come readily to mind..
why do you put the entire onus on India for improving relations?
with your vast experience in the field of international relations.. don't you feel Sir that the days of hunting with the hound and running with the rabbit are passe ?
" However, an element of uncertainty continues to hang over the bilateral ties and this relates to India’s hesitancy to move beyond small steps."
Do Kargil and Ajmal Kasab ring a bell Sir?
Country that hosted OBL for close to a decade... +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ just cannot be trusted...therefore ....India wants minimal relations with Pakistan nothing more.
@Lala Gee:
You say resolve Kashmir first. My first question is: Why?
We have everything that we want! If not doing what you wanted was so bad for India wouldn't we given up on it long time ago? It would seem India is content with the negatives of "holding" on to Kashmir. Why are you bent on stating otherwise?
India is a status quo country and you can't seem to digest that fact. Status quo also means it doesn't want anything from others and is content with what it has. If I had a penny for all the times I've used status quo country..
My second question: Define resolve.
Resolution is what the majority want, the majority in India and Jammu and Kashmir want to be part of India.
http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-04-26/india/294744201panchayat-polls-panchayat-elections-voters-cast
If you mean implement the UN Resolutions, I've already pointed out how Pakistan is the only impediment in implementing it. It has to not only withdraw before a plebiscite, it also has to get back the territory gifted to China. That is not going to happen any day so lets just forget about UN Resolutions, shall we?
All powerful countries are hated by their neighbours. Look at China! Vietnam, Japan, India..
It is just a recognition of power. Pakistan is being hated by their neighbours even without wielding any Economic or Political clout; for using Terror as a tool of state policy. Which is worse?
It is India who takes initiative and does more for peace despite Pakistan training and sending terrorists. In fact we have already done enough!! Bring Mumbai attackers to justice and we will have peace.
A cursory reading of this article, and most of the comments, is enough to show the difficulties negotiators must be facing in their efforts to improve relations between India and Pakistan. Besides, the present socio-political and socio-economic situations in Pakistan are not favorable for any bold action by a government generally perceived to be weak. One can thus rest assured that peace is not going to break out in the sub-continent in a hurry.
There are many other impediments in the way to peace. In my humble, but considered view, the eagerness for peace is not that strong in Pakistan. There are a larger percentage of people in India desirous of peace with Pakistan than that in Pakistan desirous of peace with India. Kashmir remains an important and emotional issue for Pakistanis because the truth is deliberately obfuscated by distorted history and excess of bravado. The negative image of India in the minds of Pakistanis in general, is also not based on truth and facts. The Indian initiatives for improvement of relations are thus not appreciated.
Peace will not be easy to find, but India is working towards that goal. I think, peace will come when Pakistan is convinced that proxy warriors and non-state actors can obtain nothing, nuclear weapons are not making Pakistan a strong state, dependence on other strong countries for weapons and money is against Ghairat, land reforms are essential, it pays to pay taxes, education for all is unavoidable despite any number of Malala incidents, the people must be healthy to make a healthy Pakistan, money is not more important than law-and-order, all human beings are created equal by Allah and must be so treated, religion will not solve all problems and peace becomes so desirable that even Ghairat can be dispensed with temporarily. In short, Pakistan will get peace only when it desperately needs it.
Zarra Sochiye!
P.S. Please do not reject these ideas just because India does not measure up to them adequately. Take them for what they are worth.
Partition is the best thing that happened to India. The relations will never improve and that is a fact. However, most Pakistanis and Indians are fine with that as both countries do not depend on each other at all
The writer is right to point out that India has to show more resolve in responding to Pakistan's initiatives and gestures. The normalisation process cannot remain confined to trade and terrorism if it is to become irreversible. The two sides have to begin talking about issues such as Kashmir, Siachen, sir Creek and water disputes, otherwise the hostility is likely to intensify not reduce.
@Lala Gee: And what if we have hostility with pak,BD,and Srilanka.We actually dont care.India have independent foreign policy. we cannot be biased towards any nation whether it is pak,BD or srilanka .As far as BD is concerned,current animosity is nothing.Wait till 2014.Illegal migrant is a bigger issue.We cant let muslims to change our demography.BD has to accept those migrants.I need nothing say about pak. Hindu india and muslim pakistan .....that only says the entire story.Yes for srilanka,we r really worried about.India and srilanka should work towards better ties.But india has neither gained or lost anything from these nations. If they dont want friendship....so be it.
I see a clear urge in the different sections of the Pakistani society to move on. That is all very good. But then look at Pakistan now. It is surrounded by enemies. Indian on one side and Afghanistan on the other. Moreover Iran is becoming increasingly more dependent on India. How can Pakistan handle hostilities on all side. That probably describes this new found urge for peace. Jolly good. Help yourself. You must give us reasons to move and how much.
@Author .. all the improvement in Indo-Pak relationship mentioned by you ,are the action taken by India..Pakistan is still hasistating in granting MFN status to India and implementing visa relaxation aggrement signed between the two country.Mumbai terror incident is the biggest scar on Indian psyche and new evidence of Abu Hamza & Fasih Mohammed are comming into light but Pakistan is still not showing any concern.Indian Home Minister recently accused Pakistan for helping terrorist to enter India and Pakistan brush aside the complaint instead of investigating it.Pakistan created raukus in UNO by raising the Kashmir issue.So I would like that as a Pakistani if you want any improvement in the relationship.- You should list all the things what Pakistan need to do.You are right present PM of India has genuine desire to improve relationship and it will be doubtfull once he is out of office.
@sid Taji: " I think it’s time to move forward. People like Hafiz Saeed will be marginalized if the relations between the two countries improve, and leaders on both sides take bold steps forward. There is no need to live in the past." Can't agree more. That's what is needed marginalization of People like M. Hafiz Saeed (not patronizing them) and bringing perpetrators of terror (be it people responsible for 26/11 or thugs like TTP/LeT) to justice. There is need to move forward and empathy for concerns of each other. Here author is correct when he says "if the political leaderships had been permitted by their respective ‘establishments’ the kind of freedom they should have had, the two countries may have arrived at a more cordial and constructive relationship decades ago, even if some of the ‘core issues’ had remained unresolved". But stating " there is a rare consensus among stakeholders in Pakistan regarding relations with India" but questioning intentions of India is a bit of injustice..............
@Lala Gee: who told u india relation with neighbouring country is bad .nepal is most pro india country in south asia according to recent survey .we are brother country. .india,bhutan & nepal share the open boader policy that means people from either side do not require visa to visit another country and sri-lanka send their troops to india for training not any other country.
@Author:
There is no chance that Pakistan's relations with India will improve beyond working relations, and it wouldn't be because Pakistan don't want to, but because of the Indian policy of hegemony in the area. Look around, each and every neighboring country of India is unhappy with India because of her hostile policies and actions. Even the only Hindu state in the world, Nepal, has uneasy relations with India. Pakistan and Sri Lanka both countries suffered severely from Indian malice and machinations. Even Bangladeshis are so angry with India to the level of hating her. Who is spared? Oh, China, well no need to say a word.
Ambassador. Sb., the need for haste on the Pakistani side, does not translate to an emergency on the Indian side. Prudence demands that India take extremely measured and baby steps while enhancing the relationship with Pakistan.
@Indian Wisdom:
Get some basic lessons in wisdom. Solve the Kashmir dispute quickly and amicably according to the wishes of the Kashmiri people, and all those thorny issues you have mentioned would go away spontaneously. Else, give me any precedence from history where any nation was able to keep others in bondage for ever. This has never happened in the past, and won't happen now or in future. Until then, you can keep blaming Pakistan for any thing that goes wrong in India.
@Indian Wisdom Pakistanis can also come up with a list of things perpetrated by your RAW, but I think it's time to move forward. People like Hafiz Saeed will be marginalized if the relations between the two countries improve, and leaders on both sides take bold steps forward. There is no need to live in the past.
"Do more" Pakistani style.
"It is in this context that one has to express a degree of disappointment at the Indian government’s failure to demonstrate the requisite degree of resolve and determination in pushing for a more meaningful approach to the normalisation process." Very true. What if peace accord at Lahore is awarded by a Kargil, India must show its resolve to peace!! What if India asks to bring the actual mastermind of 26/11 to justice and Hafiz Saeed is freely emitting venom against India in Pakistan, India must show its commitment for peace!! What if peace workers (Pakistan will never accept them as terrorists) from Pakistan infiltrate into India to shower flowers at Indians regularly , India must not express its frustration!!! When you are freely hosting the rallies of Difa E Pakistan (Hafiz Saeed) and expect to host Manmohan sing simultaneously then must realize both are not compatible!! I don't know how India should really express its willingness for peace that will satisfy you??? I think releasing Kasab and inviting him to New Delhi Railway Station for demonstrating his shooting skills and awarding "Bharat Ratna" to Hafiz Saeed for his contribution to peace in the region will help.....