Imran Khan’s recent foray, or a feint as we would call in military strategy, into Waziristan showcased the complete spectrum of how our politicians envisage practicing their art in this country. Don’t get me wrong; I am for Imran Khan to succeed — brilliantly, I hope, for on his shoulders are pinned the hopes of too many innocent Pakistanis — as indeed I wish any other, Mian Sahib or President Asif Ali Zardari, to succeed for the sake of Pakistan. But the spectacle was too transparent. It was vintage Pakistani politics. And, this from a leader that carries the hopes of 21st century Pakistan; someone who carries the benefit of unmatched Western exposure where politics is based on issues, not emotions and passionate frenzy. I know it is the Pakistani society that lays the demand and hence the haberdash that politicians supply, but then who has the responsibility to raise the society to modern standards of awareness and expectations? Education is one route, but there is also the informal route through those who claim a direct relationship with the masses — the politicians — using the available avenues of routine politics such as the PTI’s Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa rally and the pervasive media that multiplies such options of interaction. Here is a question for the PTI bigwigs: how was this rally different from any, say, conducted in the remote towns and villages of southern Punjab or Sindh, by a leader who is not as 21st ‘centurist’ as Imran Khan? I am clearly avoiding naming anyone here; fill those into your liking.
Onto the purpose. Drones are a problem in some manner of thinking, perhaps, in the specificity of what their cumulative strategic disadvantage has been in the Fata experience — and the jury is out on that despite venerable names of Legal Clinics from both Stanford and New York — but they clearly are not the only element beguiling peace in Fata and Afghanistan. The insidious attack on Malala Yousufzai practically encompasses the intractable complexity that rules our tribal regions far beyond the reductionist lament of drones alone. I am afraid I did watch Talat Hussain of Express News grilling Imran Khan on his conceived strategy to bring peace on our western borders. Those who saw the interview will know what I mean. Unfortunately, the apparent treatment to an issue of such prime importance to the long-term health of Pakistan appeared superficial, if anything. Mere sloganeering may cause popular support but still does not make a strategy. When we resort to religion and fatalism as a refuge, we do not have a strategy. To stop a war, we should not begin another. Leaders are meant to keep nations out of war, not walk into one. I was disappointed, simply because I know the sincerity of intent and the capacity at the top tiers within the PTI, and an absence of an A-Z consideration when dealing with an issue of such fundamental criticality was disconcerting.
What Mr Khan may be losing sight of is how his party seems to be shaping up as it grows. Many have gravitated to Mr Khan and to the available structure of his party in the hope of finding abode or, at least, proximity in the harem of power and privilege. This includes politicians, some who are revered, bureaucrats finally hoping to make it big and the military types who can always seek a shorter route to relevance and ‘second coming’ after their halcyon days in their previous lives. And there are academics and reactionaries and those with some experience with NGO philosophies. Such a motley mix is bound to engender competitiveness for the attention of the Khan. They seek opportunity rather than exude commitment to an idea and are, therefore, prone to offer quick-fix solutions that lack the depth essential to a party that aspires to national leadership. This ultimately results in cheap, flashy and disposable gimmicks that can only embarrass their leadership. What results is mostly shallow.
Politics is not gimmickry; it is serious business. And one expects Imran Khan to change the paradigm of how politics must be done in this country if we wish to make anything of it. Else, the roost will continue to be haunted by those that already crowd it. The PTI is a political party, not an NGO, nor a human rights watch group, nor an adventure club; it must not lend itself to objectives incompatible with the status it seeks.
In a broader sense, then, Imran Khan’s rally to the borders of Waziristan lacked substance. It lacked enunciating a strategy that can bring peace to the unfortunate region and to Pakistan. With the world media focused on how Mr Khan may offer to solve what bedevils the world, it was an opportunity lost. Imran Khan could have been that leader who could deliver the world out, at least in our regions, of its most vexing new war against sub-state actors. Instead, what we heard was patently ordinary, routine, combative, and non-statesmanlike. The gravitas of a leader is the sum total of his mind, his vision, his heart, his experience and his ability to communicate all of that to those who lay hope in him. Sadly, this was not the case. It was the work of an ordinary politician on a routine day out. He needs to question himself and those around him on why the people should vote for him and not Nawaz Sharif or President Zardari. Not because he is Imran Khan. Unknown to him, he is being increasingly sucked into this whirlpool of misplaced aggrandisement.
Published in The Express Tribune, October 18th, 2012.
COMMENTS (20)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Feroz:
Vote him in first, then be disappointed if he does not deliver. Remember, he is just an ordinary citizen at the moment who exercise no power over state offers and the armed forces. Get real please and ask the people who ar IN POWER why they can't solve the problems. Why is this simple fact too difficult to understand?
Call this completely subjective but I'm convinced that Taliban are a foreign entity. Foreign to Islam, to Pakistan. The notion that they are attacking us purely out of spite for non-Sharia compliant ways of living seems more of a conspiracy theory to me than anything else. They are non-Muslims with a very different agenda. And most certainly a hand to feed them. Guns are not made in caves.
'
I use to think this guy has some scene but after reading this article I am very disappointed.the whole point for this rally to my understanding was to mentally prepare America and West that Pakistan will pull out of war under Imran government that's if people elect him.then Pakistan wil deal with this problem itself and not under any outside pressure and we can solve this problem if people of fata are with us.you are too short sited intellectual Mr writer.
Imran Khan as a man may be different from other Politicians but his politics remains much the same. Like all other politicians he appeals to the base instincts of voters rather than suggesting any radical transformation to get the country out of the morass. I wish him well but there is nothing in his words or actions that can bring me comfort.
....and now, i am suddenly CONVINCED i should be voting for either AAZ, NS, or their likes. Because none of them have any role in bringing my country to its knees and keeping her there for many decades now.....
@Sarmad: Stones are thrown on the trees which bear fruit. No doubt a lot of people are not satisfied with Zardari and Nawaz and as such they saw a ray of hope in Imran. But his rhetorics, emotionalism, tall claims based on flimsy assumptions and most of all his soft corner and camaraderie with the enemies of Pakistan has dashed all their hopes. He may not be involved in corruption as he has never been in the government but perception of the ground realities and environment, intricacies of the global village politics, impending dangers for the nation are more important than to be merely corruption-free. No doubt corruption is despicable and must be rooted out systematically but the priorities must be set as per the needs of the time. At present, we need a bit-corrupt Churchill and Roosevelt than a pious Hitler and Mussolini. So now, after having read the mind-set of IK( he declared the war by Taliban in Afghanistan as Jehad but his parrying of the question about the Pakistani side clearly indicates that he thinks the same for Pakistan but doesn't have the courage to say so) a common Pakistani thinks that though he is getting only half a bread in the rule of Zardari/Nawaz he may lose even that if IK comes to power.
Talibans have a political objective ie to enforce their system of governance in Afghanistan/ any other place they can lay their hand on.Presence of foreign forces in Afghanistan is blocking achievement of their aim.They are carrying out a form of warfare, known as "Terrorism" against these forces to attain their political objective.USA led western powers thinks that the political aim of Talibans is against their politico-strategic aims.Western powers are using a combination of military force-economic power to achieve their political aim. Drone' is a weapon system being used against talibans in this war which seems to be hurting them most. Arbitrary use of drones' in Pakistan hurts its sovereignty. What PTI needs to understand is that stopping use of a specific weapon system will not end war/casulties.The issue is larger than that and needs a well thought out strategy to handle.Sovereignty as an issue was also missing in the March'.
The Mian question is ... Has the Pakistani Army learnt at alll ???
@afzaalkhan: What the author is trying to say is you can't beat something with nothing. IK is better b'cos others suck is a specious argument.
" Imran Khan could have been that leader who could deliver the world out, at least in our regions, of its most vexing new war against sub-state actors. Instead, what we heard was patently ordinary, routine, combative, and non-statesmanlike. "
So you wanted IK to be the fall guy for the Pakistani military, but he's just too clever for you. Why should ANY democratically elected politician do that? The Pakistani military doesn't obey the civilian leaders but removes them when it finds it convenient. That it doesn't do so now is because removing the civilians would be inconvenient, not because the Pakistani military has changed its spots. When the Pakistani military takes an oath to uphold the Constitution AND obey properly elected leaders, accepting that politicians can order operations and hold commanders accountable THEN one can look to the civilians for leadership that requires military action. For now, the onus is on the Army. And no matter what choice it makes about a N. Waz op - or even if it doesn't make one - Pakistanis are going to suffer.
Imran Khan could've been the secular face of this country. Preaching economic liberalization and education. Instead he plays to a religious minority that would keep us in the 7th century. All that Oxford education laid to waste.
A leader is not supposed to push a country into war unnecessarily, but a leader is also elected by the PEOPLE and has to abide by a constitution which mandates the protection of life of every Pakistani (be it in Waziristan or Karachi) and he has to stand by it. For that, a leader should do whatever possible, even military action (which would be an extreme step after exhausting all possible avenues).
You can find many faults in IK, but this is not one of them, sir. There are some red lines for countries and your "sovereignty" and right to life of your citizens is one of them which must NOT be crossed. Otherwise it's a slippery slope into compromise which has reduced us to where we are today...
And the rest of the lot have done so good for this country, right?
It is a rather mundane question - because if they had learnt anything we would not be reading this article or at least commenting on it. No, a resounding off-course not.
IK thinks that TTP's terrorism is a reaction to drones, although 90 percent drones target Molvi Nazir, Gul-Bahadar and Haqqani group which don’t target Pakistan!