"We are not a people to retreat on the nuclear issue," he told a news conference in Tehran.
"If somebody thinks they can pressure Iran, they are certainly wrong and they must correct their behaviour," he said.
Ahmadinejad's comments came amid an accelerated slide in Iran's currency, which has now lost more than 80 percent of its value compared with a year ago -- with 17 percent of its value shed on Monday alone.
The rial slipped another four percent on Tuesday to close at 36,100 to the dollar, according to exchange tracking websites.
Ahmadinejad said the plunge was part of an economic "war" waged by the West on the Islamic republic and "a psychological war on the exchange market."
Iran, he said, had sufficient foreign currency reserves.
Those reserves were estimated at around $100 billion at the end of last year, thanks to surging oil exports.
The White House said Tuesday that Iranians blamed their leaders for the rising deprivation caused by US and international sanctions over Tehran's nuclear program.
White House spokesman Jay Carney said the fast-deteriorating economic situation in Iran, which has also sparked price hikes in basic foods, was a sign the government in Tehran was under "enormous pressure".
"The Iranian people are aware of who is responsible for the circumstances that have befallen the Iranian economy as a result of the regime's intransigence in its refusal to abide by its obligations."
The US Treasury estimates Iran's foreign earnings have been cut by $5 billion a month under the Western economic measures.
In his media conference, Ahmadinejad backtracked on hints he had made during a visit to New York at the UN General Assembly that Iran could consider direct negotiations with the United States on the nuclear issue.
"Direct negotiation is possible, but needs conditions, and I do not think the conditions are there for talks. Dialogue should be based on fairness and mutual respect," he said.
But he also said: "I think that this situation cannot last in the relations between Iran and the United States."
Hardliners in Iran criticised Ahmadinejad on his return for opening the door to the possibility of talks with the United States. That also fuelled criticism that his government has mismanaged the economy.
The chairman of Tehran's chamber of commerce, Yahya Ale-Eshagh, was quoted as saying by the Mehr news agency that "part of this (currency) tumult is due to sanctions."
But he also said "the person who is not able to manage in a time of crisis should not continue working in his post."
Mohammad Bayatian, a member of parliament on an industry and mines commission, said, according to the parliamentary website icana.ir, that "a petition has been prepared to question the president."
He said the petition was "due to the government not paying attention to the parliament's remarks over its management of the forex market."
The parliament's presiding board was to decide whether to admit the petition. If it goes ahead, it would only be to hear Ahmadinejad speak on the issue, and it would not involve a confidence vote or other serious procedure.
Mehdi Mohammadi, a figure close to Iran's Supreme National Security Council, wrote in a piece for the Vatan Emrouz newspaper on Tuesday: "Is the currency situation in the market due to sanctions? No... The problem is not a lack of (foreign) currency."
He blamed the government, and unidentified "mafias" he said were profiting from the currency volatility.
Mohammadi also said holding talks with the United States was not an option.
"Past experience shows that speaking of negotiations in these conditions only sends a signal of weakness. The enemy only makes concessions and takes you seriously when you're strong," he wrote.
On the prospect of a military conflict breaking out over the nuclear issue, Ahmadinejad reaffirmed that he was "not very concerned" about persistent threats from Israel.
"Iran is not a country to be shaken by, let's say, a few firecrackers," he said.
COMMENTS (6)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Cautious
And We said to the Children of Israel after that "Dwell in the world and when the final and the last promise of punishment comes near We shall gather you out of various nations”. Al Qur’an (104-17)
We are watching a chess game, let’s see who win Almighty or Jews. Jews worked very hard on every Arab country, on every Arab tribe, on every Arab Shaikh, they deserve a bright future but they are playing chess with Almighty.
@Abreez
Name a time when the Arabs were really unified? Takes more than harsh rhetoric towards Israel for real unity.
Long live defenders against the Zionist oppression.. long live the Islamic revolution.
Time magazine Sept 24th article on Iran is worth a read. Inflation rate is over 50% - oil revenue down over 45% - currency in free fall - takes a shopping bag of rials to buy a loaf of bread - basic supplies/parts no longer available - no credit for anyone/anything - businesses closing their doors etc. I suppose this is the Iranian version of the Pakistan - eat dirt to get a nuke thing. I think that allowing UN inspectors to do their job in accordance with the NP treaty would be a better choice - but to each his own.
First objective of Israel is to weak Arab League and I think they succeed in doing so. Now Arab unity is no more, they’re not united against Israel. Second objective of Israel will be to fuel tribal war; it will take some time and when once these wars will be on the map of Arab countries everyone take advantage of these wars by selling arms and providing security personal.
Iran is so cool!