Kuldip was in Tashkent with Shastri: “In a corner of the room, however, on a dressing table, there was an overturned thermos flask. It appeared that Shastri had struggled to open it.
“In 1970, on Shastri’s birth anniversary, his wife Lalita Shastri asked for a probe into his death. The family seemed upset that Jan Muhammad, Ambassador TN Kaul’s cook at the time, had cooked the food, not Ram Nath, his own personal servant”.
The book narrates how on Shastri’s death, Pakistan’s foreign secretary Aziz Ahmed who, together with Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, the foreign minister, was opposed to the Tashkent talks, which they thought was President Ayub Khan’s act of capitulation to India, reported Shastri’s death to Bhutto like this:
“Aziz Ahmad rang Bhutto who was half asleep and heard only the word ‘died’. He apparently asked, ‘Which of the two bastards?’ The late Salmaan Taseer in his book Bhutto: a political biography (Ithaca Press, 1979) tells it differently. Aziz Ahmed said, ‘The bastard’s dead’. Bhutto asked: ‘Which one?’”
The murder of Gandhi was no mystery although AG Noorani tells us there was an effort at a cover-up. Mohammad Ali Jinnah died by the wayside in Karachi while being brought back from Quetta in a ramshackle Red Cross truck which broke down. Now, MQM’s Altaf Hussain claims knowing that he was killed by opponents within his party.
Was Fatima Jinnah killed too? Officially, no. Sharifuddin Pirzada, former attorney general of Pakistan and ‘honorary’ secretary of Jinnah from 1941 to 1944, revealed that Fatima Jinnah was killed by her cook in 1967.
The late would-be Begum of Bhopal wrote in her memoir Abida Sultaan: Memoirs of a Rebel Princess (OUP 2003): “I found Miss Jinnah lying surrounded with blocks of ice. There were blue patches on her face, mainly the left eye. There was some blood on the covering sheet, but I could not detect whether it had come out from the ear, nose or mouth”.
Pakistan’s prime minister Huseyn Shaheed Suhrawardy is supposed to have been killed by Field Marshal Ayub in 1963. In the introduction of Suhrawardy’s posthumously published memoir Memoirs of Huseyn Shaheed Suhrawardy (OUP, 2009), the following account is recorded:
“Suhrawardy’s doctor advised him to receive heart treatment. He went to London to recuperate at the home of his son, Rashid. From London he returned to Beirut in November and was planning to undergo an overdue hernia operation in Zurich.
“Suhrawardy expired in his hotel suite in the early hours of December 5, 1963. At 3:00 am he had a sudden heart attack and, as he tried to contact one of his Lebanese friends on the telephone, the receiver fell from his hand”.
Ayub’s foreign minister, Bhutto, is supposed to have sent Suhrawardy a warning: “Tell Suhrawardy not to try and return to Pakistan, otherwise I shall make sure personally that he never sets foot on its soil”.
Before his death, an intelligence official told Suhrawardy’s daughter, “Tell your father to take great care of himself. The word is going round that they are out to get him”. Three days later, he was dead.
We know General Ziaul Haq and the judges killed Bhutto; we don’t know who killed Zia. We still don’t know who killed Prime Minister Liaquat Ali Khan.
Published in The Express Tribune, September 16th, 2012.
COMMENTS (29)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
I was pretty impressed with @ Srinath's opinion
I am sure that is Shastriji's location was tracked properly then it would have been different case altogether
I guess at that we are not able to track any mobile number or IP location
thanks
@Fed Up Pakistani: Tell me one Indian forum, newspaper, or blog, where you can express anti Indian views and not get moderated? In Pakistan we have freedom of speech which they don't. You are not a fed-up Pakistani. You are an Indian. Tell me one place in India where I can pretend to be an Indian and lash out against Indians.
@srinath,
here is wiki quote. "On 6 July 1948, Jinnah returned to Quetta, but at the advice of doctors soon journeyed to an even higher retreat at Ziarat. Jinnah had always been reluctant to undergo medical treatment, but realising his condition, the Pakistani government sent the best doctors it could find to treat him. Tests confirmed tuberculosis, and showed evidence of lung cancer. Jinnah was informed, and asked for full information on his disease and for care in how his sister was told. He was treated with the new "miracle drug" of streptomycin, but it did not help. Jinnah's condition continued to deteriorate despite the Eid prayers of his people. He was moved to the lower attitude of Quetta on 13 August, the eve of Pakistan's first independence day, for which a statement ghost-written for him was released. Despite an increase in appetite (he then weighed just over 36 kilograms (79 lb)), it was clear to his doctors that if he was to return to Karachi, he would have to do so very soon. Jinnah, however, was reluctant to go, not wishing his aides to see him as an invalid on a stretcher.[165]"
So he had TB from 30s, Diagnosed with Lung Cancer and died from Pnemonea. So Pick your poison.
@Fed Up Indian: Associating Islam with killing, coups and maiming is a bigoted approach.... If Hindus had least unity amongst themselves the Muslims would have never ruled them on their own land for more than 1000 years. . . and by the way who killed Gandhi, who massacred Muslims in Ahmedabad, who maimed sikhs. . . . none other but Hindus
@conspiracy nut: I thought Jinnah died of TB.
@Lala Gee:
and one of those termites now call itself lalajee.
@Amir: Yes paaaaki Muslims are ruling India now!!HAHAHA
@Fed Up Indian:
Secularism & democracy are India's strength. Although not perfect, it still tries to pursue these ideals. Wish Pakistan had the same.
In Pakistan there are people/groups/mafias who flourish on bloodshed, and they are the out to kill anyone who simply wants to live free of hate and prejudice.
@Fed Up Indian: And Hindu seldom had the chance to rule their land. Muslims had to do it.
@Fed Up Indian:
Termite don't fight each other, they destroy others.
@Author:
I like the title and appreciate that you tried to write something different from your usual subject, but I would have liked it more if you had provided some clues using your amazing analytical skills instead of plain description of events which most readers already know. I know the real research and analysis is lot harder than to simply criticize some state institutions, but, anyway, still better than the 'Deep State' cliché .
Nation living in conspiracy theories!
We know who killed Z.A.B. Who killed his daughter, who killed his son, who killed Liaquat Ali Khan, who killed Zia, which P.A. jawans and officers slew Bangladeshis....the investigations never went anywhere and nobody got punished. Clearly, generation after generation of Pakistanis is simply supposed to let justice slide and simply concentrate on personal success.
It's always a pleasure to read you. Always bring something fresh to the table. One of the few genuine, original writers who does NEVER subscribe to rhetoric.
...And we don't know who killed Benazir Bhutto.
Unfortunately we muslims are master of the art of political and religion base murders! We will never find any clue that is I am sure! Inheritances of assassin or Hasan Ibne Sabah...!
And u also dont know who killed BB.
Some leaders make history but in our case it is their death in mysterious circumstances that often lead to drastic and unwanted changes.
Conclusion, Investigative journalists have done very poor job.
Lots of mysterious stories. But i think we need more of such stories to justify or rather rectify a lot that has deliberately gone wrong for quite a while now,since after bhutto. Such "art of killing without a trace" might prove good before the common man is wiped out.
Shastri was 61. Jinah was 72.
How long are these people suppose to live. May be conspiracy nuts should that into account.
Jinah had cancer. Average survival rate for cancer patient is 5 years in todays modern medicine not 1950s pakistan.
Shastri looks like he had weak heart.
Screening the long list of names, I feel we should be worried about those still with us. I hope nothing suspicious happens to them.
Right from the dawn of Islam, Muslim leaders have been in the habit of killing/overthrowing each other. One can get innumerable examples right from the Caliphs of Arabia, to the Shahs of Persia, to the Ottomans in Turkey, to the Mughals in India, and to present day Pakistan, Bangladesh and the Middle East. Look at South Asia and see the political history of the 4 Islamic states- Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh and the Maldives; full of coups, dictatorships, and leaders overthrowing each other. All these 4 countries are "Islamic States" (yes, even in Bangladesh it's the state religion), and afford few, if any rights to minorities. Meanwhile, have a look at the country in the middle, India- it has/had various insurgencies, but not a single coup or civil war since independence and still functioning as a secular republic.
Violence begets violence.
Missing from the list are Liaquat Ali Khan followed by the aircrash that killed the investigating team. A little later three General Officers, one of them nominted to become the Pak Army Chief [Ayub would never have made it!] in an air crash and finally the COAS General Asif Nawaz Janjua!
Death is no stranger in the sub-continent.