The apex court on Friday issued contempt notices to top officials of the country’s premier anti-graft body for not taking action against the accused in shady rental power project deals, including Prime Minister Raja Pervaiz Ashraf.
Hearing review petitions against its earlier ruling in the RPPs case, a three-judge bench of the apex court, headed by Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, asked eight officials of the National Accountability Bureau, including its chairman, to reply within a week as to why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against them for delaying investigations against the accused.
“The NAB chairman shall be [held] responsible if the officers responsible for delaying the implementation of the court’s judgment leave the country or take any other evasive measures,” the court order stated.
“Despite specific directions for implementing the judgment … NAB authorities intentionally avoided implementing them, which is a clear violation of the court’s directions and thereby constitutes contempt of court,” read the order.
While briefing the court about NAB’s progress in the case, the bureau’s deputy prosecutor general told the bench that no arrests had been made yet since investigators were ‘plea bargaining’ with the accused.
In its progress report, NAB stated that the accused wanted to settle the matter through plea bargain – an agreement whereby the accused agrees to plead guilty to a particular charge in exchange for some concession from the prosecutor.
To this, the bench admonished the NAB official saying that its judgment did not allow plea bargains. The arrests should take place first, it ordered.
While Justice Jawwad S Khawaja expressed concern over the bureau’s overall performance, Justice Chaudhry observed that NAB was turning into a body that promotes corruption instead of preventing it.
He also turned down a request from the NAB deputy prosecutor general for in-camera hearing of the case. Only cases concerning national security can be heard behind closed doors, he said and asked NAB to avoid misleading the court.
In its judgment passed on March 30, the apex court had declared all RPP agreements void and referred the case to NAB with directives to initiate criminal proceedings against those responsible – including Prime Minister Raja Pervaiz Ashraf.
Talking to The Express Tribune after Friday’s proceedings, NAB Prosecutor General K K Agha said that the bureau had summoned Premier Ashraf several times for questioning.
“Arrest is not a viable option when the accused is cooperating,” he added.
Published in The Express Tribune, September 15th, 2012.
COMMENTS (4)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
And what about the current PM Raja Pervez Ashraf in this regard who was accused of and involved in this scandal taking the oath as the PM or he is enjoying exemption and immunity as has been written in the Pakistan's 1973's constitution???????
And what about the current PM Raja Pervez Ashraf in this regard???????
“Arrest is not a viable option when the accused is cooperating,” he added. If the court said that they be arrested then they be arrested and there should be no if or buts about it. The problem is that this government came through a crooked deal called NRO and it is a conglomerate of looters and corrupt people so how could any law enforcement agency arrest all of them. Of course they have this PM who was the corrupt and incompetent person but he was elevated because he is yes-man to the boss and it does not matter what happens to the country in the process. They should remember that if they won't uphold the law of the land then the people will take the law into their own hands and time may come that these same people will be knocking at the court's doors for help but the courts may not be able to help because they have been rendered so helpless and ineffective by these same people. What a country?
I am surprised why NAB is not implementing the orders of the Hon Supreme Court. I am a firm beliver that the decisions of court should be implemented otherwise there would be break down in respect for orders of court and anarchy