CJ refuses to meet UN team investigating enforced disappearances

Chief justice says matter is sub-judice, which is why he cannot meet delegation.


Web Desk September 11, 2012
CJ refuses to meet UN team investigating enforced disappearances

Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry on Tuesday refused to meet the UN delegation investigating the issue of enforced disappearances, saying that the matter is sub-judice, Express News reported.

The team arrived in Pakistan Monday on a 10-day mission to investigate the missing persons issue.

The team's arrival sparked a debate during a National Assembly on Monday and the parliamentarians dubbed the fact-finding exercise a ‘threat to the country’s sovereignty.’

During their 10-day mission, the team will tour all provincial headquarters, meeting political leaders, government officials, civil society organisations and human rights activists to gather information on cases of enforced disappearances in the country.

The experts will analyse and review measures adopted by Pakistan to eradicate the practice, including issues related to truth, justice and reparation for victims.

COMMENTS (37)

Saeed | 12 years ago | Reply

Who are the members of this commission?????????? Please shed some light on their integrity as well..., Will they also visit "Drone affected" families and see how "happily" they are living ????? Will they also pay visit to Libya , Yemen and Iraq and see for themselves the " Happy" state of people living there after " Responsibility 2 Protect and Humanitarian Wars"

gp65 | 12 years ago | Reply

@Logic Europe: You make a very good point. In the NRO implementation case (whee strangely all the murder cases are being overlooked and focus restricted to one out of the thousands of cases), the CJ has never stopped the media from discussing the case because it is sub judice. In fact he himself indirectly refers to it in so many of his speeches.

Even in the Balochistan case he has made all kinds of speeches about how COAS will not be spared, how government is incompetent etc. When the matter is subjudice, why is he doing that?

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ