A historic breakthrough with India

Pakistan will be better able to confront al Qaeda terrorists without relying on the subterfuge of blaming India.

Editorial September 08, 2012

Indian External Affairs Minister SM Krishna and Pakistan’s Interior Minister Rehman Malik signed a historic document on September 8 on the bilateral visa regime that can transform South Asia. Eight different categories have been named for a new visa regulation, including six-month visas to visit five cities for tourists without the condition of invitation and police reporting, for businessmen of two categories with several years of multiple entry facility, and at-the-border visas for senior citizens above the age of 65, etc.

The most stubborn roadblock to the breakthrough was experienced from the Pakistan military, which has acted as an arbiter of all civilian policy towards India. Army Chief General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani is to be praised for accepting the positions taken by two mainstream parties — the PPP and the PML-N — over the past decades towards India. The new visa regime will knock off the most insuperable hurdle in the way of resolving Indo-Pakistan bilateral disputes.

Manmohan Singh’s government in New Delhi has also taken some steps that no past government had dared to take. It has chosen to set aside its preconditions relating to terrorism that it attached to any initiative at normalisation. New Delhi has decided to forget the accusations by our interior minister and the various TV channels about how India was paying the Taliban to kill innocent Pakistanis and enabling the Baloch rebels with dollars to launch attacks in Balochistan. There was a time not long ago when Mr Krishna used to come to Islamabad asking for proof which was never forthcoming. India still wants Pakistan to do something about the elements that are responsible for the 2008 Mumbai massacre and has swallowed the acceptance of some proxy warriors in Pakistan that the world accuses of cross-border terrorism.

Mr Krishna has emerged as a most effective communicator during his visit, insisting that his government wanted a stable Pakistan. The government has given him extraordinary protocol, getting him to meet the president and the prime minister before his meeting with Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar. What he and his Pakistani counterpart have agreed upon will meet the approval of the main opposition party in parliament, the PML-N. Its leader, Mr Nawaz Sharif, has been announcing — in the face of disagreement from his conservative vote bank — that he would abolish a visa requirement with India after coming to power. He actually went further than anyone in Pakistan in consigning the perennial bilateral disputes to the post-normalisation era when he suggested that Pakistan should withdraw from Siachen unilaterally.

Once enforced, the new visa protocol will be transformational. Given the rise in India of an opulent middle class keen to travel as tourists, Pakistan will have to go on overdrive to build new facilities to cater to the new tourism despite its terrorism-marred conditions. New hotels and roads will have to be built for people coming by road, new border check posts in Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Punjab and Sindh will have to be constructed to receive them. Pakistan will now find it easy to agree to a two-way transit trade route between Afghanistan and India, thus averting the losses it was sure to sustain from the opening of an alternative route through the newly-built Iranian port of Chabahar. The route that joins India and Afghanistan will ultimately be the regional commercial highway to Central Asia. One can hope that the project of the Iranian gas pipeline will be favourably affected by Indo-Pakistan normalisation.

The normalisation-first approach — favoured by the world but not by Pakistan — is going to facilitate the final resolution of bilateral disputes: Kashmir, Siachen, Sir Creek, Wullar Barrage and other water issues, and terrorism, etc. Above all, Pakistan, once assured of peace on its eastern border, will be better able to confront al Qaeda and its ancillary terrorists like the Taliban, the Lashkar-e-Jhangvi and Jandullah without relying on the subterfuge of blaming India. Pakistan will cease to be the national security state preying on its own people and will be better able to align its national economy with the well-being of its people.

Published in The Express Tribune, September 9th, 2012.


Ayush | 9 years ago | Reply


That is what i am saying. I think you just displayed your lack of comprehension skills. I am tring t say that it is indeed foolish at this point to say that Pakistanis and Indians are similar and to emphasize on this point, i tried to define India by which India and Pakistan can be differentiated. The concept of India is an amalgamation of thousands of narratives and not one( like Pakistan). India's essence is inclusive whereas Pakistan's is divisive. It is in this context of an understanding of modern day India that i differed with Indian Catholic. Comparing a South Indian with Sri lankans s already ridicuous since they share no simlarities given the fact tha a mojority of Sri Lanka is Sinhalese and Buddhist unlike South India which has vared languages and religions. Yes, the Tamils are there, bu using them to compare South Indians with Srilankans is as ridiculous as using Pakistan's christians and comparin them with Vatican City and saying that there is a similarity. Understood? Maldives too is almost entirel Muslim an have a cmpletely different narrative compared to any Indian State. Besides, the discussion here was about ideological similarities not cultural ones(even in which case this comparison is wrong). If it is a question of cultural similarities the Pakistanis indeed hare a deep bond with India since a majority of India's population( North) speak their language and have a culture that is very similar to Paistan's. The generic term India means an amalgamation and not any one narrative in particular. THAT is why the comparison was frivolous. Next time think before you take the arrogant moral high ground.

arjun | 9 years ago | Reply

@Ayush: It just shows your lack of knowledge. SouthIndians have far more similarities/culture with Srilankans than North Indians but none of them consider that more important than their country India. It is foolish to say in 2012 that Pakistanis are similar to india when for 40 years of islamic fundamentalism has changed the outlook of Pakistanis. Even culturally Pakistanis may find some resemblance in Punjab and UP but to generalise a gaint Indian nation is foolish. Indian Catholic is right. Pakistanis -many being being narrow minded in religion think that all of India is like Pakistan in culture which is false. The Idea of nation is greater than idea of culture or relgion which will be very very difficult to understand for slaves of any religion.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read