It is true Ms Kaif seems to be flavour of the year in Pakistan. She was the subject of contention in May, when it was widely reported in India that some Pakistani activist groups felt a print and television advertising campaign for a beauty cream featuring her was morally inappropriate. Earlier, in April, a gossipy item speculated that Ms Kaif was denied a Pakistani visa to attend a fashion show because she refused to take up the offer of a private dinner with a minister. And then, again, was another false tittle-tattle that Ms Kaif and fellow Bollywood star Salman Khan would dance at the Lux Style Awards in July.
The only story anyone could confirm is that the Kaif-Khan starrer Ek Tha Tiger, due for an Eid release, was banned by the Pakistan’s Central Board of Film Censors. The implausible plot has a scientist accused of selling forbidden missile technology to Pakistan and an Indian secret agent is in pursuit and so on, which, one might say, is basically asking for it. In that sense, Bollywood, now awake to a big market in Pakistan, faces a real dilemma. Should it stay true to the traditional Indian bromides or get real?
Until 10 years ago, the average Bollywood film was made with an average budget of five crore rupees. Three out of four films flopped, but the producers continued to make 125 films a year because the losses, too, were not enormous. In 2009, the Shah Rukh Khan-starrer Devdas was promoted as a Rs50-crore production. The third-time remade movie declared a profit of Rs20 crore. The Indian movie industry was electrified. Now, suddenly, the Indian film industry is beginning to talk in terms of budgets in excess of Rs100 crores (one billion). The Khans of Bollywood are not only the kings of entertainment in India, but in widening markets overseas. Non-Resident Indians (NRIs), other South Asians and traditional Bollywood markets in Africa, the UK and the US yield a third of all box-office revenues. The industry believes this will now grow to 50 per cent in the next few years.
But markets have their own sensibilities and sentiments. Trade always dulls strong faith and sharp prejudices. It was easy in the past to frame the villain and send the fighting hero to beat him. But now, Bollywood has to be mindful of the new audiences. Increasingly, it will need to put in the virtues of tolerance and communal harmony into its productions. The sensibilities of the overseas markets have so strongly influenced Indian cinema that it is now commonplace that true love is found only in the character playing bride or boy from overseas.
Take the Kaif-Akshay Kumar starrer Namaste London, for instance. It has it all: good, traditional Punjabi boy and overseas with-it-but-confused Punjabi girl. He has a soft heart, but beats the Brits at rugby. He proceeds to wreak the patriotic portfolio on the English snob, but the producers will also have the scene where he offers sage counsel to the now familiar Muslim friend to respect his own Islamic traditions of the sub-continent. This is good market secularism and should work for the swelling South Asian populations overseas, especially in the US. They buy it.
But Pakistan poses the greatest challenge. The industry forgot to tweak the plotline and so put at risk two big-budget productions this year, Agent Vinod and Ek Tha Tiger, both of which have been banned for offensive portrayal of parts of the Pakistani establishment. Ever since Pakistan lifted its 40-year ban on Indian films in 2006, the Pakistani market for Bollywood has grown at an amazing rate — more than threefold in four years. For Ms Kaif to get an offer of Rs2.5 crore for a single show would not be a great surprise. She is a star in Pakistan too and could gain in this market by a big, live show. However, a negative publicity campaign by fringe activists back home, querying her religious faith or horror of horrors, even national loyalty, could seriously compromise her career. Even the great Khans of Bollywood would not risk such a thing.
Published in The Express Tribune, September 7th, 2012.
COMMENTS (31)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Lala Gee: This proves how much malice an average Indian has against Pakistan as a result of continuous brainwashing and hate campaigns by the Indian politicians and media.
In my opinion, even in that area, I mean in being malicious towards Pakistan, Pakistanis compete with Indians. Seldom respected are those that respect themselves not. Hubris & swagger can not make up for that dearth. You may not believe me but I say that sans malice.
A place named pakistan didn't exist before 1947 , so stop listing people born before 1947!! As for this article , katrina is a british citizen who works in India but she never claimed to be a pakistani and she had visited n worshiped at hindu , sikh , muslim religious places in india , so she probably don't want her name stick with a particular religion... As she was raised by her british mother , she probably not a proud pakistani!!!
@abhi:
"Pakistan is not a teritory but a mindset which is represented by hardliners and fundamentalists"
I see!!! You mean Nirendra Modi, Bal Thakery, Maya Kodnani, Babu Bajrangi, Sajjan Kumar, Lalit Maken, and several thousand others of the kind, are all Pakistani leaders. BJP, Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) and Shiv Sena are all Pakistani political parties. Also the followers of 'Hindutva Movement' fighting to establish 'Hindu Raj' are all Pakistani hardliners. And, all the anti-minority riots against Sikhs and Muslim in which tens of thousands were slaughtered, innumerable girls were gang raped, and hundred of thousands of homes and businesses were torched were all carried out by the people came from Pakistan. Here goes the Nobel Peace Prize to India.
@lala ji Pakistan is not a teritory but a mindset which is represented by hardliners and fundamentalists so even though the persons u have listed were born in the area which is presently pakistan, they do not belong to pakistan. Similarly even though AQ khan was born in indian side of border, he belongs to pakistan.
@gp65:
"It is interesting that you took credit for Dilip Kumar who was born in undivided India in what is now Pakistan but not for Dev Anand who was in the exact same situation. Is it because Dilip Kumar is a Musliim and Dev Anand A Hindu?"
Current Indian Prime Minister, Mr. Manmohan Singh, ex-PM Inder Kumar Gujral, Mr. K.L. Advani, and the great singer Mohammad Rafi were also born in present Pakistan. I guess even if we try, perhaps you (Indians) wouldn't accept and give credit to Pakistan for obvious reasons.
@gp65:
"GIven the stupendous response that ETT got in the Indian market (Rs. 170 crore Indian rupees), I would very much doubt if anyone is shedding tears aout the fact that it did not get a Pakistani release."
If your statement is true, then it is an eye opener for us Pakistanis. This proves how much malice an average Indian has against Pakistan as a result of continuous brainwashing and hate campaigns by the Indian politicians and media. And amazingly you blame Pakistan for the hate mongering. However, you are right that Pakistan is not a big market for Indian movies. Perhaps you already know the reasons. At least I don't find them worth wasting my time even if I can watch them for free. In UK, about 15 years ago my cousin took me to watch a very publicized Indian movie, but we couldn't take it more than 20 minutes and eventually we exchanged the tickets at counter for a Hollywood movie. And that was my last time I dare watching an Indian movie by spending money.
@gp65
Pakistan is a potential market of 180 million, this is equal to UP I believe, would any film maker in India make a movie designed to ignore or offend UP? of course not he is a business man and he aims to maximize his profits which means making sure to appeal to as large a population as possible.
The potential of the Pakistani market is too big to ignore, just ask anyone from the industry to monetize the lost revenues they suffered due to illegal Indian movies in Pakistan on Video/CD/DVD before 2006 and you will understand. Now they are able to make money from a captured market, sadly Pakistani films do not stack up well to Indian films and English film watching population is miniscule, so Indian movies is what the masses watch and there are 180 million of us.
So if any Indian movie producer/studio boss ignores this he is just undermining his own revenues and is a poor business man.
@ author: Sir, could you please enlighten me the reason for writing this piece @ ET: why publish such articles in the first place?
I don't know how much adjustment author had to do in his narrative,in order to suit this article in accordance with Pakistani sensibilities,but no Indian ,female, Muslim and an visibly glamorous actress would dare to visit Pakistan in present circumstances,where religious nut-jobs are preying after everything they deem immoral and vulgar specially when the target is a lady.all the assumption of religion and nationalities aside,how many mainstream Bollywood actors and actresses are visiting Pakistan?where Sri-lankan players are not spared , Ms Kaif is only more vulnerable.
Dear Author, Thanks for quoting our news article at the very start of your write up. But if you had only searched Google, you could come to know that "a negative publicity campaign" is actually being executed from India itself and not from Pakistan. This news was first published and spread by India's renown publication Daily Bhaskar, Please follow the link below:
http://daily.bhaskar.com/article/ENT-katrina-says-no-to-pakistan-3730869-NOR.html
and it was reproduced later by One India: http://entertainment.oneindia.in/bollywood/gupshup/2012/katrina-kaif-says-no-to-pakistan-offer-099024.html
The Pakistani news publications & Entertainment Websites later picked up this story. It is interesting to note that you follow Pakistani Blogs more than the Indian Publications. :)
i would like to know in which interview Katrina kaif said she is proud pakistani? She is educated, so dont need to a devorced person like Imran khan to find her a groom,as she is not orphan. Pakistan is not her home as she is from indian accupied kashmir not a pakistani one.
Geeeeez if I had that much money I'd probably spend it feeding the poor, supporting an impoverished student, the disabled or even sustainable projects. God gave some people money but no brain!
@Terry: You want to see other side of Pakistani "love" for India ? Visit PKKH
Katrina is not half Kashmiri,infact she is 100 % British ,Its just that her father has a mediterranean heritage and thats the reason for her olive complexion
Wrong information about Devdas. It was not made in 2009.
I am shocked at how much hate there is for pakistanis in india ...just came back from a visit ti lahore .....attitudes are different there .....shame
Ms Kaif probably values her own life more than Rs 2.5 crores from a Karachi millionaire.
@Vikas: "If Katrina Kaif has lot of love for Pakistan, she can go there and perform, act in their films and probably settle over there.
" Don't respond to these uninformed people. Katrina is a British citizen. While any Bollywood actor actress can have goodwill towards Pakistan including the Hindu actors and actresses- that's not a problem, however Katrina has never given statements that maybe construed as anti-India/pro-Pakistani. This is unlike that laughter challenge guy who got fame and money from India and then goes back and disses India.
This article if a molehill of assumptions built on a mountain of uninteresting gossip. Waste of time, really.
@Sir King Kong Bunty: "I am sure Imran Khan can find a suitable partner for her if Ms Kaif chooses to make Pakistan her home. As I said she is a proud Pakistani person and for her its like visiting home. Just like several famous Pakistani exports to India – Ustaad Nusrat Fatheh Ali Khan, Veena Malik, Shah Rukh Khan, Dilip Kumar etc.
"
Dilip Kumar was orn in undivided India. He was in Mumbai already before 1947 and never consdiered migratingto Pakistan. Dilip Kumar has NEVER claimed to be a Pakistani. Shah Rukh Khan was born in Delhi. While he does have some cousins in Pakistan, he has NEVER claiemd to be a Pakistani. KAtrina Kaif is a British citizen with a Kashmiri father. She has never claimed in any interveiw that she is a 'proud Pakistani'. It is interesting that you took credit for Dilip Kumar who was born in undivided India in what is now Pakistan but not for Dev Anand who was in the exact same situation. Is it because Dilip Kumar is a Musliim and Dev Anand A Hindu?
Ofcourse we respect and appreciate Pakistani singers like Nusrat Fateh ALi Khan, Rahat Fateh Ali Khan, Shafqat Amanat Ali have contribute to Indian movies. We also appreicate Ghulam Ali and Adnana Sami who made India their home.
I am sure Imran Khan can find a suitable partner for her if Ms Kaif chooses to make Pakistan her home. As I said she is a proud Pakistani person and for her its like visiting home. Just like several famous Pakistani exports to India - Ustaad Nusrat Fatheh Ali Khan, Veena Malik, Shah Rukh Khan, Dilip Kumar etc.
@Sir King Kong Bunty:"Katrina is half Kashmiri, which makes her a Pakistani origin person. Therefore coming to Karachi for her is like visiting home." Yes typical story. Her father was a Kashmiri who married a native Briton and as usual sired 4 daughters and dumped all of them. Katrina's mom had to bring all of them up on her own. And here comes this gentle man to claim responsibility for her achievement and to which country she should owe allegiance. By the by her actual name is Katrina Turquotte and Katrina Kaif was the screen name given by kaizad guztad, who by the way is behind bars today for negligently causing the death of (again a Pakistani struggler of British origin, Assistant Director who had come from Briton to be part of Bollywood) in a train accident. By the by Nargis Fakhri who is half Pakistani, born to Czech mom and Pakistani father. She her self has not identified with the country and has come down to India to try her luck here. Need I say more about your false pride and chest thumping... Rgds P
"Bollywood, now awake to a big market in PakistanIn, faces a real dilemma. Should it stay true to the traditional Indian bromides or get real"
Uh no. The Pakistan market really isn't that big. 80% of SRK movies revenue and close to 90% of revenue for most other stars comes from domestic sources. Of the 10% international revenue, USA, UK and UAE cover 85-90%. WIth Australia and Pakistan sharing the remaining. Thus we are talkin g of 1-2% revenue that is attributable to Pakistan. Here to bulk of the revnue goes to Pakistani distributors not Indian producers. GIven the stupendous response that ETT got in the Indian market (Rs. 170 crore Indian rupees), I would very much doubt if anyone is shedding tears aout the fact that it did not get a Pakistani release.
@Author:"In 2009, the Shah Rukh Khan-starrer Devdas was promoted as a Rs50-crore production." Typo error I guess. SRK starrer Devdas was released in 2002. Seven good years than what was mentioned in the article. I am sure it was more of a typo error than lack of knowledge on authors part. By the by I hail from the same city as he does. Rgds P
Just trash...
If Katrina Kaif has lot of love for Pakistan, she can go there and perform, act in their films and probably settle over there.
Katrina is half Kashmiri, which makes her a Pakistani origin person. Therefore coming to Karachi for her is like visiting home.
Ms Kaif is a British citizen.
Ridiculous article. Ek tha Tiger's success has shown that Pakistan is no make-or-break territory, in fact it hardly matters. The respect for Islamic traditions is not to impress Pakistanis but to express solidarity with our own sizeable muslim population, who definitely influence a movie's box office take. The other stories that you have dug up on Katrina Kaif only indicate the extent of your research, since most of them did not really make headlines. Further, I don't think anyone in India cares if Katrina goes to Karachi or Kandahar or Kuala Lumpur; I am sure there is enough Pakistani money that goes into many of the shows that are done in Dubai etc and monitoring these are a waste of time. Unfortunately so was this op-ed.