OBL raid: "No Easy Day" contains classified information, says Pentagon

Spokesperson Little hoped that book's publication wont affect US-Pak relations.

Afp/huma Imtiaz September 04, 2012

WASHINGTON: Pentagon Press Secretary George Little confirmed that the book, “No Easy Day” contains classified information regarding the bin Laden raid in 2011, adding that the United States hoped that the publication of the book will not affect US-Pakistan relations.

Addressing the media at the Pentagon, Little described the book as a "no-brainer,” saying that the Pentagon was concerned as the author had not submitted the book for a pre-publication review to them.

In the book, published by Penguin’s Dutton imprint, former US Navy SEAL writing under a pseudonym, Mark Owen, identified in media reports as Matt Bissonnette, describes his role in the famed raid on bin Laden’s Pakistani hideout as well other operations in Iraq and Afghanistan during his 14-year career as a Navy commando.

The book has already featured on Amazon’s bestseller list for the last two weeks, despite being released on September 4.

Responding to a question on Pak-US relations, Little stressed that US ties with Pakistan were on a better footing now and he hoped the that the issue of the book will not affect relations between the two countries.

The spokesman further said that in days after the raid, they had scrubbed the material of sensitive information before it was cleared for press briefings,"Regrettably, there were disclosures that were problematic."

Asked if the US government would take legal action against the author, Little said officials were reviewing all legal options.

"Legal avenues are available to us. I'm simply not going to get into what we may or may not decide," he said.

Earlier in the week the Defence Department had warned the ex-commando and his publisher not to release “No Easy Day” next week, saying the author violated non-disclosure agreements he signed while in uniform.

The Pentagon said it has reviewed the text but officials declined to say if the book reveals state secrets, vowing to keep all legal options open.

Bissonnette's lawyer offered a rebuttal to the Pentagon, insisting the author had not broken faith with his commitments and that the non-disclosure agreements did not apply to the bin Laden operation.


Sexton Blake | 9 years ago | Reply

@Tony Singh: Dear Tony, I think you mean Tony Sing trusts America, but certainly not the world. Just ask anybody in Iraq, Libya, Syria, Korea, Vietnam and the other 30 odd countries America has attacked since WWII. Oh, but silly me, I forgot. You would visit the gravestones of millions of people murdered in those 37 countries, and say good job America; I trust you even if you kill my loved ones as well. After all, killing people is just part of the job when you are securing world wide resources. Another aspect to consider, is where would America find a nuclear weapon without US markings or The "Star of David" stamped on the side, but then America can do anything can't it? They even lost several Boeing aircraft engines at 9/11 sites, and jet engines are made out of the toughest metal known to man. However, looking at the whole thing from a different perspective I suppose if they cannot find black boxes and jet engines, from 9/11, on their own territory perhaps Iraqi nukes are still in Iraq somewhere? Another aspect of American trustworthiness is that since taking over Afghanistan they have managed to lift production of heroin from virtually zero to many billions of dollars. Yes Tony, on second thoughts I think you are correct. We can safely trust US CENTCOM to bomb, kill people, and grow opium for heroin production, and all this whilst saving the Afghan people. What more could we expect?

Tony Singh | 9 years ago | Reply @Sexton Blake: You know what Mr. Blake, they did not find WMDs in Iraq and they were honest about it. Had it been any other country, it most probably would have planted one. That is why. Mr. Blake the world trusts America.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read