
Some would say that, perhaps, the Supreme Court should have recognised the perfect face-saving measure that the PPP had provided to it in order to end this long-standing constitutional morass. In explaining its refusal to write the letter, Prime Minister Ashraf specifically cited the president’s immunity from prosecution and claimed that asking for the Swiss cases to be reopened would violate this constitutional provision. The Supreme Court, however, chose not to pay heed to this argument. The Swiss authorities have also said in the past that they would be unlikely to reopen any case against a sitting head of state. What is important now is that this matter be brought to a dignified close that allows the PPP to live out its remaining days in power without any further clash between institutions. The sanctity of the Constitution, the principles of democracy and political stability must be upheld by all stakeholders.
The PPP is now in a battle of time for its own survival. It is able to weather the dismissal of one prime minister; another forced removal may precipitate early polls. That may just be why Ashraf asked for a few more weeks to study the legal aspects of the case — a request that would otherwise be absurd given that the PPP has had more than two years to formulate its position in the matter. Running out the clock for as long as possible may be the only option the Supreme Court now has left for the beleaguered PPP.
Published in The Express Tribune, August 28th, 2012.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ