From schools to colleges, Pakistani students are introduced to Muhammad Ali Jinnah as the founder of the nation and his message of unity, faith and discipline. However, they are rarely told about what he said to the Muslim youth during his address on discovering their leader in 1934.
This was said by noted historian Dr Ayesha Jalal while speaking to a gathering of students, ex-army officers, bureaucrats, academics and civil society members on Thursday evening. The event was held at Islamabad Club to mark the second anniversary of Jinnah Institute.
“Think well before selecting your leader and when you have selected him, follow him. But in case you find his policy detrimental to your interest, kick him out,” Jalal said while quoting Jinnah.
She went on to shed light on some of the aspects of Jinnah’s beliefs, his personality and his constitutional and political acumen that won a separate homeland for the Muslims of India.
During the course of her talk, she quoted Jinnah from his addresses at different occasions to different audiences.
“He was a great constitutional expert who won a country with his argument, countering all under hand deals and opposition from all sides,” said Jalal, adding that at one point Jinnah was opposed by everyone including Muslim leaders from Punjab, the Congress and the British.
“He was not invited to the third roundtable conference mainly for his independent point of view which he spoke out loud and clear,” she added.
Explaining Jinnah’s vision of a strong federation, Jalal said that the recent process of devolution of power to the provinces under the 18th amendment was not properly thought out before being implemented. Though she appreciated the idea of devolution, she insisted on the federation taking responsibility of certain tasks such as tax collection, education and health, which cannot simply be handed over to the provinces.
“You do not have the infrastructures in place. So it is like the federal government abandoning the responsibility of doing certain tasks and shifting the burden to the provinces which are not ready,” said the scholar.
She also noted that the division of provinces on the basis of governance will add more problems rather than solving existing ones. For instance, carving more provinces out of Punjab will only strengthen it in the Senate.
“Two Punjabs in the Senate will have more power, three will have even more, and I am sure Punjabis would love it when it comes to division of water,” she added.
Dr Ayesha Jalal is a professor of history at Tufts University, USA. She is also a director at the Centre for South Asian and Indian Ocean Studies.
Published in The Express Tribune, August 18th, 2012.
COMMENTS (35)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@sam: "Quaid e Azam (Mr Jinnah) converted his wife to Islam and than married to her" Agreed, but his daughter converted to a Parsi and married one. In her recent interview she claims that her mother before she died converted back to Parsi when Mr Jinnah left her.
@vasan: Agreed, also supported by Girilal Jain, in The Hindu Phenomenon (1994) when he said:
"Muhammad Ali Jinnah was the greatest benefactor of Hindus in modern times, if he was not a Hindu in disguise."
This report in the Guardian just a few days ago tells a million words of Jinnah: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/aug/14/pakistan-independence-religious-intolerance-jinnah It notes Pakistan has omitted his message of tolerance the basic rule of any civilisation. "You may belong to any religion, caste or creed – that has nothing to do with the business of the state," Jinnah told the gathering on 11 August 1947. Ask the Ahmadis, Hindus and Christians and you will get the point why Pakistan has failed.
"Failure is a word unknown to me" is a famous quote of Muhammad Ali Jinnah. However, sadly Pakistan is ranked as a failed nation. I agree with some readers here that he was a brilliant lawyer but not a Statesman.
@ kaalchakra
I practically swoon whenever I hear the name of such a great constitutionalist, great leader, great Muslim, great democrat, great visionary, great nation-builder, great scholar, great humanist – the handsomest, most honest, practical, bravest, charitable, and funny man ever born in our part of the world.
perfect hums being -2?
@nomi:
A great lawyer who won his last case using all means available, the case of partition of India. Great lawyer indeed.
Jinnah was an outstandingly brilliant lawyer.Period. Attributing anything more to him is illogical. Pakistan was created by vested western interests, who wanted to contain an ever expanding Soviet Union and to check an India under Nehru, which was openly pro soviet. Jinnah used the Pakistan card to become united India's first Prime Minister instead of Nehru, who was the clear favourite for the job. When it didn't work out, Jinnah was happy with getting Pakistan to get his place in history, but neither Jinnah or Liaquat Ali Khan, lived long enough to lay a strong foundation for Pakistan, unlike India where Patel & Nehru help lay a solid foundation.
He was also a communal leader, who used religion to divide people and architect of the day of "direct action".
PK
Despise her? Why would anyone despise her? It is the most beautiful love story between the Great Quaid and a bright, beautiful young woman who had the pick of Bombay but naturally chose the Great Quaid who was always the winner.
its Ayesha Jalal's Pakistan not Quaid e Azam's Pakistan. i have left country already.God Save Jinnah's Pakistan
@PK: Mr Jinnah converted a woman to Islam and than married her.He also disapproved his daughter marrying to a non muslim.( well recorded history). Mr Jinnah was proud muslim not like Ayesha Jalal. Islam says,no muslim man or woman can marry a Hindu. We can't make her role model for our youth.
he was a man of so many contradictions. Let us not pull out a prophet of Old Testament out of him. A fine lawyer but not a statesman at all.
@sam: So what of she did, it's none of anyone's business. Admire her for her work and not despise her for marrying somebody of her choice. I am happy Jinnah created Pakistan to house people like yourself.
We love Jinnah & haters...... go take a cold shower....
@ abida
A pathetic question, but I will answer. What has India got to do with my questions?
India, US, Israel is this all you think about? I merely asked as to why we have this confusion of systems in Pakistan? And I found Mr. Jinnah responsible for it.
leave, go to india or amreeka? What is this.
For the record it was my land that became part of Pakistan and I did not migrate to Pakistan.
Food - home?
We are having an academic debate thats it. Pakistan will not vanish if we ask questions.
This is how insecure we have become that we do not even have rational arguments to justify our creation.
@ JQ
Mr. Jinnah is the founder of Pakistan which is a fact and you have every right to glorify him.
We are just seeking the reasons for Pakistan's current plight. Mr. Jinnah could have avoided a lot of confusion.
For instance, note that had he assumed the responsibility of a PM, democracy could have been strong and he could have made decisions that now are unthinkable.
What is our identity? Why are we following an anglo saxon law when we are an islamic state? Why are we carrying a colonial legacy when that was the very reason we divided india? Why do we have two distinct educational systems?
Even though we agreed upon a fantastic constitution, many groups now have challenged it religiously and many people frankly side with them.
All this confusion could have been avoided had Mr. Jinnah articulated a clear vision; instead of a plethora of double meaning speeches.
Whatever may be the opinion of people about Jinnah, Indians after 65 years of freedom have profound heartfelt appreciation and gratitude to Jinnah for what he has done to India. Thank you Mr Jinnah.
@nomi: its u who are unable to focus on ur destination.he provided u home .is he responsible to provide u food even after death? what thehell is ur responsibility?y dnt u leave and live freely in india?
Quaid e Azam (Mr Jinnah) converted his wife to Islam and than married to her.
In Islam a muslim woman can not marry a non muslim woman and same a muslim man can only marry woman of book (Christian and Jew). A muslim man can not marry a Hindu woman.
@JQ: This independent link however disagrees with you:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/6940148.stm It appears to be suggesting that today's mess in Pakistan is partly his fault. He could not follow the basic rules of democracy. "In political terms, democracy has been the first casualty of this hybrid system.
Its foundations were shaken by two controversial decisions made by the country's founder and first Governor-General, Mohammad Ali Jinnah.
He dismissed the Congress-led government of the North West Frontier Province (NWFP) by decree, and instead of ordering fresh elections, appointed a Muslim League leader as the chief minister with the mandate to whip up parliamentary support for himself.
Secondly, he declared to a large Bengali speaking audience in Dhaka, the capital of East Pakistan, that Urdu would be the only state language." Since then we have lost East Pakistan (Bangladesh) and there is debate whether we will hold Balochistan.
Finally, I am sure historians will not agree with you when you say there are no leaders like him today. This link suggests he just wanted power and was not interested in the welfare for the muslims he fought. With hindsight it seems India has benefited from his two nation theory. https://sites.google.com/site/cabinetmissionplan/mountbatten-and-jinnah-negotiations-on-pakistan-april-
@JQ: I think you are wrong. Today we have zardari and rehman Malik. Obviously preferred by some of the people who have made comments here. They are the revisionists, who now claim that Jinnah was a Sunni Muslim and envisioned an Islamic state governed by people with unkempt beards.
@ sam
For me more shameful is the loss of lives on the third consecutive day.
thanks to Mr. Jinnah's prosperous Pakistan.
I beg to differ with the opinions rendered by different set of people about or Great Leader Jinnah. Undoubtedly, Jinnah was a Great Leader, thinker, great lawyer and have the guts to fight for a separate homeland for the Muslims called "Pakistan" where you are now enjoying the privilege of first grade citizens. So, we must hold great respect for our leader.
May I ask to to find such leader in today's world who can be comparable with Jinnah. I am sure you will find none like him.
@ salim
The fight of secularism vs islam is just an academic debate now. The main reason for Pakistan was that muslims would prosper.Have they?
Jinnah was not even himself clear on what he wanted. Why didn't he impose sharia instead of the 1935 constitution is just mind boggling.
Lastly, you said no ethnicities. Pakistan is not south korea. The land called Pakistan is naturally diverse. Its diversity has been its strength which has been systematically eroded.
I am just surprised at you right wingers, you paint a utopian image of Islamic Pakistan and its muslim founders while many you reside in the secular west.
Stop seeking greatness in Jinnah - start seeking greatness in the people that make up pakistan today and genuinely want a secular pakistan even in the face of danger to their lives - Jinnah never saw a day in jail or in trouble - these pakistanis face threats to their lives everyday. I could give you a list for the next jinnah anniversary. You say he was democratic and wanted his followers to kick out leaders...yet he suspended the govt of bacha khan 8 days after independance, imposed an alien language and treated sindhi nationalism as traitorous.
He was just a good lawyer from Mumbai carried by the wave of personal ambition - and epitomises the adage - be careful what you wish for.
@sam:
hahahha..............what is it coming out of you?
but for your satisfaction, let me tell you that MIRA NAIR of india is married to a pakistani gentleman.
What a great man. Whence cometh such another? At the risk of sounding like a teenager with a crush, I practically swoon whenever I hear the name of such a great constitutionalist, great leader, great Muslim, great democrat, great visionary, great nation-builder, great scholar, great humanist - the handsomest, most honest, practical, bravest, charitable, and funny man ever born in our part of the world.
"She went on to shed light on some of the aspects of Jinnah’s beliefs, his personality and his constitutional and political acumen that won a separate homeland for the Muslims of India."
I agree only with a part of Ms Jalal's above quoted statement that is Mr. Jinnah's legal acumen, he was a great lawyer without a doubt, but as for as winning a separate homeland for the Muslims is concerned we owe a lot more to the British than to him or any other other Muslim league leader if the Congress had played their cards right and fully cooperated with the British rather than defying their authority by starting Quite India Movement, resigning from the provincial ministries especially on the eve of World War 2 then there would have been no division and no Pakistan. It is no secret now because a lot more documentation has been declassified and available for the history student that the British in their own interest fully encouraged Mr. Jinnah and the Muslim League to ask for a separate state which would also be a future foot hold to safeguard their investments in the Middle East against the ever expanding Soviet Union. This is what actually happened behind the scenes in creating our country to put it any other way is misquoting history with dishonest scholarship.
Ayesha jalal married a Hindu from india. shame
Don't talk about this man. He is responsible for unrest and blood shedind that we find today in our subcontinent ,
"great constitutional expert"? You must be kidding. He joined Muslim League in 1906 and for the next 40 years he could not draft a constitution for the country he was struggling for, and you are calling him a great constitutional expert. He was a wise man, but for himself. As for a leader... I doubt that he was a leader.
He was a great lawyer, but had no vision for Pakistan. He is the man who left us struggling between islamic extremism and secularism. He made no effort to make a clear vision for Pakistan.
And who can forget the infamous imposition of Urdu as a national language on numerically superior bengalis. Mr. Jinnah does not serves as an inspiration outside Pakistan, he will be remembered by history as a local hero of the people of Western India.
I am sorry to have to offer a more honest opinion on Jinnah. Claims by liberals that he was secular hold no water at all, when all his actions were focused on creating a separate country on the basis of religion. Not culture or ethnicity, mind you. Since otherwise jinnah is no different ethnically from his bhatia Rajput grand parents who converted to Islam. Actions always speak louder than words, so no point quoting Jinnah's speeches. Jinnah created a country for Muslims where Muslims would be chosen people and Islam would be the governing principle. Period. And the rest is history, as they say.