All petitioners, including Pakistan Bar Council, Balochistan Bar Association’s former president Baz Muhammad Kakar among other were present inside the courtoom where a five-member bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry was hearing the petitions.
The petitioners maintained that certain clauses in the contempt law were against the Constitution and that they should be omitted.
One of the petitioners, former Islamabad High Court Bar Association president Advocate Ashraf Gujjar had directly challenged presidential immunity on the grounds that it is against both the Constitution and Islam.
During the hearing, federations counsel Shakoor Paracha prayed to the court that he was approached by the federal government yesterday (Sunday) and that he required some time to study the case and take further directives from the ministry.
Attorney General Irfan Qadir said that the case is first of its kind and that a period of two weeks should be granted to the federal government.
Differing from the attorney general’s request, Justice Chaudhry said that the case is not the first of its kind, but many such cases were being filed in the Supreme Court.
He further observed that once the petitioners are done giving their statements, the federal government should start giving their statement, too.
The controversial legislation – which has been termed a ‘black law’ by the opposition – is aimed at shielding the new premier from contempt proceedings similar to those that led to Yousaf Raza Gilani’s ouster from the country’s top office.
COMMENTS (8)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
SHAME! SHAME!! due to their personally enemity, the President & the CJ can go to any extent on the expense of poor nation hard earn money . . . .????
how surprising that it takes few hours to the Law Ministry and the Parliament to make the law and it needs weeks to defend it before the court. It speaks for the process of law making. The present law was to save $ 60 million of one person that a black indefensible law was passed in record haste.
Is Mr. Iftikhar Chaudary a judge or the petitioner's counsel...I have yet to read about or see such an overtly biased bench
Oh yes , it is a slap on the face of an absolutely incompitant judiciary, appears to be serving the interests of fanatics .
@Beatle: Depends what you meant by Hope
How come the ministry concerned always appoints a lawyer at the last moment? Delaying tactics?
@Logic europe hull: So fat the court has dealt against "HOPES". This time is not going to be different.
Hope wisdom prevails