India’s home minister, Palaniappan Chidambaram, and Pakistan’s adviser to the prime minister on interior affairs, Rehman Malik, break out into a full-scale war of words, with the media on both sides becoming their willing instruments in belief. Malik has now resorted to Twitter, probably in an attempt to directly communicate with the masses.
Meanwhile, the foreign secretaries of India and Pakistan, Ranjan Mathai and Jalil Abbas Jilani, met in Delhi for the first time since each of them took over their respective assignments. Jilani knows Delhi well. He was the charge d’affaires there in 2003 — because Pakistan’s high commissioner at the time was expelled after the 2001 attacks on the Indian parliament — when he was asked to leave, ostensibly because he and/or his mission were allegedly paying off an Indian spy. The case against Jilani remains alive at the Chankyapuri police station in the Indian capital, which the Pakistani diplomat has visited often since 2003 but will come for the first time as foreign secretary.
Just as the Abu Jundal can was spilling out like a case of terribly bad worms, Pakistan released, unsung, 314 Indian fishermen who had found themselves on the other side of the shifting maritime border, along with the hapless Surjeet Singh, who served time in a Pakistani jail for 34 years. The establishment in Islamabad hoped that the gesture would prepare the ground for Jilani’s visit — that is, until Abu Jundal took over the airwaves.
Thing about the India-Pakistan universe in India is that it is divided into two black and white parts: those who sniff at the ‘guftagu-band-na-ho-baat-se-baat-chale’ stream of thought and those who believe that India should hold no talks with Pakistan until terrorism stops. You could call it the ‘Abu Jundal vs Surjeet and the fishermen’ school of thought. In Pakistan, meanwhile, a terrible fatigue seems to be taking over with Indians often accused of not being understanding enough towards the terrible challenges that ordinary people face in Pakistan.
But between the candle-lighting brigade at Wagah — itself a soppy, sentimental gesture that smacks of the incredible courage of the innocents — and those in favour of the tough guy approach, lies a middle path that both President Asif Ali Zardari and National Security Adviser and former high commissioner to Pakistan Shivshankar Menon seem to favour.
Menon brings an enormous influence to bear on India’s foreign policy. Naturally, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh depends heavily on him. For some time now, Menon has advocated a pragmatic approach that believes India should engage with several constituencies in Pakistan at the same time, in accordance with the character of that constituency. So, if the business communities in Karachi and Lahore believe that trade barriers must come down and that the ‘sabse-bara-rupaiya’ theme — as eloquently articulated by Karachi-based businessman Majyd Aziz — will move India-Pakistan relations forward, then so be it. If artists, Bollywood-wannabes and students want to explore the limits of their creativity on the other side, that’s great. If the Pakistani political class wants to engage with their counterparts in India, what could be better?
As for the Pakistan Army, whose relationship with the Pakistani political class is itself undergoing an incredible transformation, the proof of the pudding can only be in the eating. The public ranting against the Pakistan establishment — save for a few diehard Indian television channels — will stop, but trust and verification will go hand-in-hand.
There’s the other message from Delhi: credible action against the Mumbai accused will allow India to open its doors to Pakistan in ways both countries could never imagine. Will Pakistan seize the bait? Can President Zardari accept India’s conditional offer to reform the canvas at home, especially in these embattled times? The people of India-Pakistan wait patiently.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 20th, 2012.
COMMENTS (31)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Ulrike from Germany
Good one, brother. We are sick of these Indian 'ex Swiss Diplomats' and 'Well-Wishers of Pakistan from Timbaktoo who loves Pakistan' etc.
Pakistan itself is in a very complicated situation. We have a generation who has been raised under Gen Zia Ul Haq's regime who besides other things made sure that we learn creatively edited history, glorify arab warriors and make a shift from Khuda Hafiz to Allah Hafiz (Persian Sub Continental Roots to Arab Wannabees). This shift that started in 1979 culminated in 2002 when Gen Musharraf decided to go against many of the then Gen Zia's policies. Gen Musharraf's attempt in those 8 years was to reset Pakistan's orientation. From Madrissa regsitrations to revision of curriculum in schools. The Indian movies which were banned in Gen Zia's time were released in Pakistani cinemas. The monopoly of Govt controlled TV channel was ended with over 50 private tv channel licenses. However, all of it didnt go very well with the generation who was so well brainwashed. This created a polorization of Left & Right groups. On one side today we have PPP, MQM, ANP who openly condemn terrorism, fundamentalism vs PML N, PTI, JI who would rather condemn drone attacks. The interesting development is that Pakistani Establishment always used Right Wing parties, however with media's openness, a free judiciary and embroilled troops in war on terror establishment is now finding it very difficult to reign in. Thats why precisely PML N is no more in good books with them. Recently created Difa-e-Pakistan Council out of nowhere to a 50k people procession indicates the establishment's might. Unless Pakistani's realize and take charge of their own lives, peace with India, Afghanistan or Iran will remain a dream. The watchman's existence depends on the suspicion, threats and conspiracy theories. You eliminate the conflict the next thing would be you wont need that many watchmen. The watchmen's core competency lies in "Defence Capabilities" and not an expert on peace, governance, foreign affairs. Its time to make friends in our neighbourhood rather then three blocks away in the Middle East or the US. We need to balance.
Salim
(1) Whatever you wrote is not true. (2) Even if any of it is true, two wrongs don't make a right.
There is a duty to the cause of justice in Kashmir and Pakistan will pursue it to the last.
@Arijit Sharma: How dare you to disparage Pakistani analysts and columnists in such a primitive manner! Who of them do you know (if you read ET regularly you should certainly know some of them)? Who have you ever met for a professional discussion? Have you ever red a book written by a Pakistani political analyst? I advise you to think twice before throwing dirt into other people's front garden.
@kaalchakra: what about genocide of hindu minority in pakistan...........no peace unless u give justice to balochs.....india has taken a principle stand........
As SH and Bilal have already highlighted, there can be no peace until and unless India gives justice to Kashmiris. Pakistan has principled stands in its affairs, and simply cannot participate in any progress based on injustice. Once India does full and real justice in Kashmir and to Muslim minority in India, Pakistan will be India's best friend.
Excellent Article.Great thinking.The article is pratical, insightfull and meaningfull . I think Mr Shahzad Chaudhry(The author of parthsarthy doctrine) should get some lessons from @Jyoti Malhotra on who we can move forward rather than writting some thing bizzare,unmeaningfull.
It's the establishment of Pakistan who calls all the shots! Not the politicians, businessmen, journalists, etc
Terrorists are terrorists... its that simple. A terrorist deserves the highest punishment no matter what nationality it holds.
@bilal: Your list is toooooooooo long. Please table it before the United Nations.
@Arya: True. I can see that Karma unfolding everyday in Pakistan but I am NOT dancing or distributing sweets yet.
@S.H: " ... Kashmir issue is the main cancer that has brought so much destruction to South Asia, why not let Kashmir be given to Kashmiris? ... "
So Pakistanis think of Kashmir as cancer ?
@Nand: "I saw people coming out into the streets dancing, singing and distributing sweets for the mayhem being carried out in Mumbai"
Eventually law of Karma will catch up with those committing sin..
again! ..... one sided none of the facts which Miss Malhotra presents are wrong, however the historical setting is lost. To put things in perpective and understanding history, one must not forget the injustice of Kashmir in 1948, the Indian assistance in the break up of Pakistan, The Siachen invasion, the water troubles. The indian position on all of the above issues has been rigid for decades The fact is that Pakistans reactions to these excesses has been irrational but which other state in the world would have NOt reacted to neighboring state when faced with these excesses from across the border? Even today Indias inflexibility on bilateral issues is frustrating. Pakistan, inspite of its irrationality, has shown felxibility and a willingness to solve issues on all issues but the line from India stays the same. This inflexibility does not help people in Pakistan who want peace with India, nor does it help Indian interests in the longer term Lose the "always right approach" India
@Mir Agha: Even if you forgo your obsession of Kashmir, Sir Creek, Siachen + thousands of others, Indians will never forget those horrific 72 hours of mayhem carried out by Pakistan. Not only that, I was watching Geo TV where I saw people coming out into the streets dancing, singing and distributing sweets for the mayhem being carried out in Mumbai. Yes we all do understand that you all too know who the real perpetrators are but you have too much respect for them to be exposed. Justice is justice whether civilian or khaki
@Mir Agha, You should also let go of kashmir agenda with India which was a conflict 65 years ago .
Unless and until Pakistan and India come to fruitful and open minded negotiation with full honesty, no US, and no UN will come to resolve our conflicts. India is spending billions of dollars and similarly Pakistan is spending billions of dollars to counterfeit India in defence and the poor masses at both sides are spending their lives below poverty line. India and Pakistan must accept each others existence as a reality and discourage at every level all those state and non-state actors that deteriorates our relations. Kashmir issue is the main cancer that has brought so much destruction to South Asia, why not let Kashmir be given to Kashmiris? Why not it should be left as a free buffered state between Pakistan and India where Kashmiris should be allowed to be free and make their own decisions by themselves. There should be no army in Kashmir, there should only be local police for security. Let they also live like normal humanbeings. They should also exploit their own resources and live a peaceful life. Pakistan and India both will benefit from this, we wouldnot need to spend billions of dollars on buying weapons from US and the west. But unfortunately India wants supremacy in this area and Pakistan is not ready to accept this supremacy.
"For some time now, Menon has advocated a pragmatic approach that believes India should engage with several constituencies in Pakistan at the same time, in accordance with the character of that constituency."
It seems, at last India has learned to deal with Pakistan. Let Indian army deal with Pakistani army and their assets and everything else can be dealt at people to people level. Be kind to common Pakistani but tough with Jihadis and their backers. I am pretty sure this policy will pay in due course.
@Babloo: If Pakistan does not accept that the nine accomplices of Kasab are their citizens then the Indian government should bury them in unmarked graves and not allow anyone to visit them ever. Pakistan will never acknowledge them as its citizens because that will be tantamount to accepting involvement in the death of 180 innocents in the Mumbai attack. This will force Pakistan to take actions against the terrorists which it continues to protect under the orders of ISI.
Jyoti- I agree for the most part. I think if we in Pakistan had given high priority to the issue of tracking down Mumbai massacre suspects, it would have been a much more positive gesture than everything else combined. Regardless of whose fault it was, innocent blood has been spilled that requires bringing culprits to justice.
In 1965 India let go of Haji Pir, that provided diect link from Punch to Baramulla, in 1971 it returned territory as well as POWs on Bhutto' promise of Kashmir settlement, but worst betrayal was Kargil. Abu Jundal's testimony convinced even Saudi Arabia of 26/11 plot and ISI's involvement that they handed him over to India. The rest of the world has no doubt about the involvement of Hafiz Saed and ISI, but only Pakistan refuses to see it. For Indians it's a kind of litmus test for Pakistan's reliability and trustwortiness. How many times can you forget and forgive?
The people on both side of the border desire movement of people and goods across the border, and as the author suggests this should be allowed while other issues remain under discussion.
I hope Shazad Chodhury reads Express Tribune and reads the above article. It's not a question of 'milking' 26/11, but acceping the truth for a change. Analysts in Pakistan itself have written columns and advised their own goverment that it should come out of the denial mode.
Is Singh prepared to accept Zardari's unconditional offer, to the benefit of the people of both countries? India needs to stop being obsessed with the Bombay attacks and get over it. There is no evidence that can hold up in a court of law.
The author needs to acknowledge facts. Pakistan has not moved the investigation into the 26/11 attack but stone walled and blocked prosecution of the masterminds. What have we discovered from the LeT masterminds in Pakistan protective custody , Zakiur-Rehman Lakhvi and Zarar Shah ? Nothing. Pakistan has the leaders and the perpetrators but it wants to question Kasav ! Pakistan has not even acknowledged the identity of the 9 accomplices of Mr Kasav, recruited and trained by Mr Lakhvi. I dont think that a ordinary Indian wants to be a part of the charade being perpetrated at Adiala.
Finally an Indian writer on ET who makes some sense - welcome back Ms. Malhotra. Let trade and entertainment contacts continue unhindered, but on the foreign policy front we really need to stop this endless dance of 2 steps forward and 3 steps back. Let us keep our expectations low and normalization slow.
It's very important to bring the perpetrators of Mumbai attacks to justice in order to facilitate any credible forward movement in the Indo-Pak relations. Otherwise the peace process will remain a futile exercise.
Pakistanis will understand our pain if we release Col.Purohit and Sadhvi Pragya responsible for Samjauta Blasts on the grounds of "No credible evidence" and they roam around the country making anti-Pakistani speeches and collecting money for destroying Pakistan.....
Of course,above scenario will not happen as India will not release Purohit nor will Indians (even the radical RSS type) will consider him as a Hero
Good Analysis but old habbits die hard.
Gangs of Junal needs to be taught a lesson...