Of course, part of the reason the DPC has now become such a vital force is that it is being coddled, appeased and even supported by mainstream political parties. It comes as no surprise that religious parties like the Jamaat-e-Islami and the Jamiat-e-Ulema Islam – Fazlur Rehman have extended their best wishes to this coalition of extremist groups. What is more disappointing is that even the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) has shown a willingness to support the DPC, despite the presence of militant groups such as the Jamaat-ud-Dawa in leadership positions. The PTI has always insisted that its opposition to the US was principled in nature and did not imply support for militant groups. However, that claim will ring hollow so long as its representatives continue to attend DPC rallies.
The turnout at its rallies and the complete absence of action from the authorities against this coalition of militant groups would suggest that the DPC is being kept as a bargaining chip by the military establishment. Making demands of the US is a lot easier when the military can point to the supposed popularity of this anti-American force. However, the military should also be aware that such phenomena have the tendency to slip away from their masters as is evident with our jihadi non-state actors. The army thought the mujahideen of the 1980s and then the Taliban which took over in Afghanistan in the 1990s were under their control. Now, the military is being attacked by its former protégés.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 17th, 2012.
COMMENTS (7)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Is this the New York Times editorial?
Seriously ?
this story is outright lie. PTI did not participate in DPC rally. Tribune has made it a habit to manufacture anti PTI rubbsh
The blind support of PTI will take their supporters to and this country to destruction. At least for once critically analyse IK's actions! DPC is full of terrorists and murderers and PTI has a common goal with them? PITY!
This means that saying 'NO' to NATO Supply is a sin committed by religious parties. The editorial does not reflect a Pakistani point of view. It seems it has been written by a foreign element for a particular objective. Religious parties are part of Pakistan and they have a right to express themselves. According to the definition democracy means 'Government of people, by teh people, for the people'. On one hand democracy seems to be the fifth book and on the other you do not listen to the people. Can you redefine the democracy.
It is one of the very valid causes, why present it in so much satirical way, who are we tryng to appease
ET is not realizing that supporting a cause doesn't mean supporting a group. Your interests may converge with some but there are some clear distinctions. I always find negative comments for the anit-American group in ET although they have right to differ from pro-US policy.
"Making demands of the US is a lot easier when the military can point to the supposed popularity of this anti-American force." Not even close. The fact they would hold them up like that as examples considering the participants, is only going to add weight to arguments by those saying Pakistan is an enemy. They're nothing but detrimental in talks.