Ali Musa seeks pre-arrest bail in ephedrine case

LHC Rawalpindi bench to take up plea on July 16.


Mudassir Raja July 15, 2012

RAWALPINDI:


Pakistan Peoples Party legislator Ali Musa Gilani has approached the Lahore High Court for pre-arrest bail in the ephedrine quota allocation case, insisting that there was no evidence against him. 


Justice Iftikhar Hussain Shah and Justice Ibadur Rehman Lodhi of the LHC’s Rawalpindi bench will take up the bail plea of Ali Musa, former premier Yousaf Raza Gilani’s son, on July 16.

Filed through advocate Dr Khalid Ranjha, Ali Musa maintained that he was not nominated in the FIR registered with the Anti-Narcotics Force (ANF) Rawalpindi and there is no direct evidence against him available on record with the investigators.

He further told the court that he had been cooperating with the ANF in the investigations and was ready to respond to each and every query of the investigators.

Talking to the media, Advocate Chaudhry Faisal Hussian said the prosecution in the case needed strong collaborative evidence to prove the statement of two approvers – former Health Director General (DG) Dr Rasheed Jumma and Rizwan Khan, a director of a pharmaceutical company as well as an accused in the case.  Their statements in the case, which alleged the illegal allocation of 9,000 kilogrammes of ephedrine to two medicine companies, are not in accordance with relevant criminal laws, the lawyer maintained.

The ANF obtained arrest warrants for the accused on June 20 after Dr Jumma volunteered to become an approver against him as well as former health secretary Khushnood Akhtar Lashari and former health minister Makhdoom Shahabuddin.

On July 2, 2012, Ali Musa obtained protective bail from the Sindh High Court for two weeks to access the trial court and investigators.

The high court is also going to take up the bail petition of Shahabuddin, Dr Jumma, former deputy drug controller Abdul Sattar Surani.

Former DG health fails to record statement

Meanwhile, the Special Judge Control of Narcotics Substance could not record the statement of Dr Jumma as approver, following his mysterious disappearance.

Following Friday’s no-show, the ANF also failed to present Dr Jumma before the trial court on Saturday to record his statement against Ali Musa, Shahabuddin and Lashari.

ANF Special Public Prosecutor Wasim Ahmed informed the court that Dr Jumma was not well and would not be able to be present in court at the next date of hearing either.

Meanwhile, the court of magistrate for ANF did not record the statement of two others accused in the case –Cann Pharmaceutical Multan chief executive Hashim Khan and Florence Pharmaceutical Multan chief executive Ehsanur Rehman as prosecution witnesses.

Magistrate Shafqatullah Khan directed the two accused to take some time before recording their statements.

The hearing was adjourned till July 19.

Published in The Express Tribune, July 15th, 2012.

E-Publications

Most Read

COMMENTS (3)

Snausher | 8 years ago | Reply

No body should be above the law, if some one has committed and offence no matter which class he/she belongs to, they should feel the full force of law and all should be treated equally.i just wonder why Musa Gilani is still free why he hasn't been behind the bar yet? Just because he is son of Ex PM with loads of money? Just because he is very pawefull and source full man? I think he should be treated same as an ordnary Pakistani will be treated in this kind of case. But in Pakistani society it's just a DREAN

Syed | 8 years ago | Reply This case has defamed Pakistan and Pakistanis all over the world. Imagine the sort of humiliation Pakistanis face while traveling abroad, when they are searched in and out and then Ex - rayed, specially of our ladies, really tortures you mentally. Such drug trafficking by head of the state or his spouse definitely justifies all humiliation shown against Pakistanis all over the world. We will be highly satisfied if all these people are caught and hanged publicly. This will certainly set an example for others and may give a pacifying effect at international level. Quick and drastic action required to create proper effect.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ