
Although such moral policing might begin with seemingly innocent and lawful advertising campaigns, they can quickly morph into something far more dangerous. We saw this happen in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa after the election of the MMA coalition in 2002. A campaign against the depiction of women on billboards soon turned violent and with explicit state patronage, vigilantes started tearing down billboards and attacking stores selling CDs. As a result, all advertising, indeed all arts and culture, came to a grinding halt in the province and even now, it is yet to recover from this orthodoxy.
This campaign, when placed in conjunction with the type of advertising we have, shows a public that is confused and unsure of itself. We want both the thrill of risqué advertising while reserving the right to indulge in piety about the state of advertising. That, in essence, is what moral policing is all about and it grows out of a fear that other people may be enjoying themselves in a manner that some may not approve of. Furthermore, and perhaps even more important, is the issue that no one has anointed such groups as the guardians of morality and the nation’s values. That responsibility is left to individuals, who are the best judges of what they would like to view and consume, within the bounds of the law.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 2nd, 2012.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ