In a unique move amidst festering political uncertainty, the government moved to placate nervous world capitals that it has no plans to take any “radical steps” which may exacerbate its ongoing row with the judiciary over the reopening of graft cases against the president.
A rare briefing took place at the foreign ministry on Thursday for diplomats stationed in Pakistan, during which Law Minister Farook H Naek attempted to dispel the impression that the country was heading towards any major constitutional or political crisis – particularly in regards to a lingering controversy over the National Reconciliation Ordinance (NRO) implementation case, sources revealed.
The briefing – attended by envoys from the US, India, Afghanistan and other world capitals – came just a day after the Supreme Court gave newly inducted Prime Minister Raja Pervaiz Ashraf two weeks to state whether he intends to write a letter to Swiss authorities or not.
The briefing, it is believed, was arranged in light of growing concerns in major international capitals about the future of democracy in the face of a bruising civil-judicial faceoff in the country.
Last week, former prime minister Yousaf Raza Gilani was ousted from power by the country’s top court in a similar case when he refused to write a letter to Swiss authorities regarding the reopening of graft cases against President Asif Ali Zardari.
The latest court direction has led to a flurry of speculations that the ruling Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) was considering several options to pre-empt the judiciary’s next move — including a constitutional amendment to curtail the Supreme Court’s powers to interpret constitutional issues, and set up a new federal judicial body to deal with such matters.
Following the court’s fresh deadline, the new prime minister held emergency talks with Law Minister Naek and Attorney General Irfan Qadir on Wednesday to discuss all available options to deal with the situation. The government, it is believed, is also contemplating changing the law of contempt to provide immunity to both the offices of the president and the premier.
However, a source, who attended Thursday’s briefing at the foreign office, said the law minister denied these speculations vehemently. “Pakistan is passing through a transition and every institution is trying to assert itself,” Naik was quoted as telling the diplomats.
He insisted that all issues would be settled within the constitutional framework.
An official statement said that the foreign ministry hosted a briefing for the heads of diplomatic missions on “foreign policy priorities of the government”. Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar spoke about the smooth transition to a newly-elected prime minister, and the government’s abiding commitment to strengthening democracy, it said.
The statement added that Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar was accompanied by Law Minister Naek, who, while briefing the diplomats, reiterated the government’s commitment to an “independent judicial system, and respect for rule of law”.
Published in The Express Tribune, June 29th, 2012.
COMMENTS (14)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Doomed are the nations who glorify their criminals,and consider it an honour to be corrupt.
Do nothing for people and yet claim to represent them.Criteria to rule the masses is amount of loyalty and sacrifices you have presented to your party leadership. PPP is machiavillian at it's core.
Merit and integrity are very obviously redundant attributes in such a culture. we have glaring examples of this in people holding highest offices of the government.
@Mirza: "To go to jail is an honor and test of a politician and the nation rewards them.".......we know that how much honourable it is to be in prison and convicted.
Breifing was unnecessary this is Pakistan's internal matter. If elected government do not want confrontation with judiciary then be it. It will show our democratic process strength and will stabilize it further
@Usman: Each and every political leader of the country except a few who have been in the pocket of the army been in jail on serious charges multiple times. This means nobody from PPP, MQM, ANP, Sharif Brothers, Hashmi (jailed for treason) and most of the NA and senate would be criminal. While the convicted Sharifs are ruling most of the country only the PPP leaders are convicted criminals. Prior to being president and PM both Zardari and Gilani were in jail for decades, yet they were elected with huge majority. Why was their election allowed in the first place? How criminal are the people who supported them including Sharif? How criminal the PCO judges are who let them rule for four years? To go to jail is an honor and test of a politician and the nation rewards them. Regards, Mirza
The way to avoid confrontation was to make a PM with no past criminal records or investigations pending. What the government is doing now is appointing criminals as PM and then sending out statements to the media saying 'we want peace with the judiciary, please let our appointed criminal run the country'.
And some people here have the nerve to defend such actions.
@Jahaz: FYI no way.
Mr. Hina Rabani Khar, i wonder how you realized this very early that your party cant stand against Judiciary.
Never believe a word uttered by this smirking law minister! Remember his utterances on restoration of judges.
It takes them five years to understand the meaning of LAW!!! leave us alone!
Charter of Democracy between PPP and PML-N and Charter of Dictatorship between Boots and Coats.
@YP Toronto: seems like you too are related to someone 'just' :)
"nervous world capitals"
Perhaps Washington and London are worried about the political misbehaviour, judicial confrontation and non-democratic all powerful Army.
The wold capitals, (W and L excluded) are not concerned with what happens in Pakistan. Pakistan is free to act as it wishes in internal affaires.
BTW Judicial confrontation is an internal affair and it has nothing to do with Foreign Office.
The intervention of Khar is null and void.
Credit should be given where it is due, maybe now the focus can be off petty squabelling and towards more important things like providing basic necessities to the citizens
" Rare move: Govt pledges no ‘radical steps’ in row with judiciary "
Because they know they cant win confrontation with judiciary.