The ECP has also tried to tackle the problem of political parties, who simply bus in thousands of poor people to vote for them by offering them some money. This has been done by banning candidates and political parties from using vehicles to bring voters to the polls. This reform should be easier to implement so long as the ECP has the manpower to have its people posted at all polling stations to ensure that the rules are being followed. Bans on wall-chalking and the display of party flags will be harder to enforce since candidates can claim that it is their supporters who are responsible for these acts.
The ultimate test of this code of conduct will be the fairness with which it is implemented. The ECP is supposed to be a non-partisan body but has historically sided with whichever party has appointed the chief election commissioner. With by-elections to be held in Yousaf Raza Gilani’s constituency next month, we will be able to see this new code of conduct in action in the run-up to the next general elections. An ECP that is not scrupulously fair will ensure that the reforms are not worth the paper they are written on.
Published in The Express Tribune, June 29th, 2012.
COMMENTS (5)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
what about expat voters???
Correction: 9 million, not 90 million.
Not even one of the above code of conduct can be implemented. There are so many ways to go around the rules and we as a nation are expert in doing that. ECP should introduce reforms like runoff elections system and electronic machine voting, which by themselves could be called substantial reforms
The rule that bars MNA's and MPA's from spending more than Rs 1.5 million and Rs 1 million respectively was there in 2008 elections too. There was no check and balance even then. A report in dawn highlighted that average spending of a candidate was Rs 90 million in 2008 elections