The picture shows a short, slight, dhoti-clad youth flanked by policemen. A British cop has the air of a successful hunter. Two Indian policemen in the frame look stiff, as if the photographer had barked ‘saavdhan’ instead of ‘say cheese’. On the face of the young bomber though, there seems to be an enigmatic smile.
In my native Bengal, Khudiram Bose’s smile is an integral part of his legend. This man smiled in the face of death as the judge read out his sentence. We tend to see his smile everywhere.
To the Bengali, this other Bose is what Shaheed Bhagat Singh is to north India. This is not to say that the rest of the country does not care. The Facebook post of the picture was shared by thousands of people from all over the country. The comments had a common ‘Jai Hind’ refrain, and common national complaints: where was the spirit of Khudiram now? Is this the kind of India he gave his life for?
The source of the original post is a community page titled ‘Let’s speak India’. For anyone who wants daily updates on the levels of the Indian middle class’s naivety, its simple-minded patriotism and its appetite for drivel, this is a really good place to start. (This community supports, for whatever it is worth, the candidacy of former president APJ Abdul Kalaam for another term as president. It is inspired by such Kalaam gems as: … “let difficulties know that you too are DIFFICULT” (sic).)
At the risk of being branded unpatriotic, possibly traitorous, I would like to revisit the legend of Khudiram Bose. It goes something like this. In April 1908, Khudiram and a revolutionary comrade Prafulla Chaki set off on a mission to assassinate a pathologically cruel judge called Kingsford. On the evening of April 30, they threw a bomb at his carriage when it was returning from his club in Muzaffarpur. Only, it wasn’t Kingsford in the carriage. The occupants were two British guests of the judge — a mother and daughter who both died in the attack.
Bose and Chaki were apprehended separately in the days following the attack. Chaki preferred committing suicide to being captured. Bose was not able to draw his weapon in time and was arrested. He confessed to the bombing, entered a guilty plea and was sentenced to death by a district judge.
Khudiram’s story spread across Bengal at a speed social media might envy, his youth playing no small part in charging up thousands of young Indians. When the case went into appeal at the Calcutta High Court in July, thousands would turn up outside singing the stirring Vande Mataram anthem.
But the appeal in Khudiram Bose vs. Emperor was a curious one. His counsel suggested, obliquely, that it was Chaki (now dead) who actually threw the bomb, Bose being hampered by the heavy revolvers on him. He then argued that the sentence be mitigated keeping in mind Khudiram’s youth; that his confession showed “his feelings were not fully developed and that the crime was an insane act of criminal folly”; that his attitude during the trial (the brave smiling face) suggested he was not of strong mind — “a mere tool in the hands of others”.
These are recorded denials of the very elements that fill out the legend of Khudiram Bose. But the image of a young man trying to save his life does not sit well with us. We will our martyrs to go smiling to the gallows. And then we ‘like’ and ‘share’ and comment.
Published In The Express Tribune, June 15th, 2012.
COMMENTS (24)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Zalim Singh: A lot them; Is there a point to score? We should get out of gimmick of point scoring based on historic realities and look forward to future through our past. The freedom fighters are heros who so ever they may.
A Peshawary.
@vivek ruparel: Perhaps you did not understand my post - I have only respect for Dr. Kalam.
@BruteForce: These are important questions, with ramifications beyond the topic being discussed here. I can only share my opinion: 1. I think we have the right to know the unvarnished truth. This is not the same as destroying a legacy (unless the foundations are that flimsy to begin with), but allowing people to see events and actors through today's eyes to judge it better. 2. Should we promote a legacy that glorifies violence - No. One man's terrorist is another's freedom fighter, and we are hypocrites if we condemn the same action in one breath and praise it in another. At the same time, the truth is that every situation is not the same, and knowing the context helps people form a more unbiased opinion.
Glad to keep the discussion going.
Just one word, 'Flippant'.
@A.Javed
it is really disgusting
What is disgusting???
@BruteForce 1) Should we destroy the legacy of people, even if it were based on falsehood, if that legacy was serving a greater good? I think we should destroy falsehood, however this is not the case here.
2) Should we encourage any legacy which encourages violence, even if that violence is committed “for the country”?
we need to to be judicious here, while not condoning the violance we have to show respect for the idea and people how fought for the country.
I've been thinking about this topic for a while now.
1) Should we destroy the legacy of people, even if it were based on falsehood, if that legacy was serving a greater good?
2) Should we encourage any legacy which encourages violence, even if that violence is committed "for the country"?
There are no simple answers in this. I for one am proud of our non-violent, patriotic struggle. I chose to be ignorant about the violent revolutionaries of that time. They chose a path they thought which was right, I am sure they were too, but somehow seems, to be at least, lesser than the non-violent struggle people like Gandhi, Nehru(and mandela and martin luther king for their countries) suffered.
it is really disgusting
@a_writer: point taken. that was sloppy.
@Zalim Sing: Many............
how many pakistanis will read this?
@sb: and don't get me started at 1857....that was the last time we fought like indians....where hindus and muslims fought side by side to protect their religion...
@sb: ashfaqullah khan from faizabad, kakori conspiracy fame, was hanged with RAM PRASAD BISMIL.
SIR, YOU HAVE JUST INSULTED A revolutionary's soul who died for his motherland, not for his religion. so i would like you to make a correction to your knowledge base: not every hindu and muslim is a bigot, some are pure revolutionaries... ashfaqullah and his friend pandit ram prasad bismil were such shaheeds.
What does the author want to convey?
@SB: "Very shameful act and the reason there is not even one muslim revolutionary name we can find in history against british."
Why don't you look up Ashfaq Ullah Khan? That takes care of your "even one", and then go read who really paid the price for 1857 and what happened to Muslims around Delhi at that time.
I can see that this is going to an all-indian-fest . enjoy yourself.
There we many muslims , belonging to Congress, who went to prison fighting for Indian independence. However, there is no Muslim from Muslim League that went into prison. The reason is that the leaders of Muslim league did not think of themselves as sons of the soil of India. They saw themselves as usurpers and decided to make a side deal with the british usurpers.
Khudiram Bose's "enigmatic smile" looks thousand times better than Avirook Sen's grin.
"He was caught and hung in a matter of months" - Hmm - I always thought that only a painting or a flower pot can be 'hung' - a human being can only be 'hanged' !
Eminent lawyers Kalidas Basu, Upendranath Sen and Kshetranath Bandopadhyay took up Khudiram's defense. They were joined later in the trial by Kulkamal Sen, Narendranath Lahiri and Satischandra Chakraborty—all of them fighting the case WITHOUT FEEs. Their main goal was to save the child as they knew the trial was biased and the result was per-determined. While entire India was fighting the british, the muslims sided with the british for personal gains and stayed loyal to british, as asked by their leaders. Very shameful act and the reason there is not even one muslim revolutionary name we can find in history against british.
It is incredible that events of 1908 are being used by the writer to define us today, based on the defense plea and a photograph of a single young freedom fighter in British India, and some other random material. When you cut to the chase, the basic content of this pointless piece is (1) revolutionaries (based on a sample of one) are found to be in good humor; (2) Khudiram Bose et al were a silly bunch of kids that couldn't even kill the right guy and paid for their mistake with their lives (3) the counsel for the defense should not be appointed by the Crown for any revolutionary, - if they are, they should in fact plea on behalf of their clients that the strictest punishment be awarded (4) Dr. APJ Abul Kalam does not know English and wishes to inspire the people that are dismissed as naive and simple-minded. Predictably pathetic.
You're right about the naivety of the middle class. Same goes with the Pakistani middle class too and probably in every third world country! nice article.
Vande Matram!!!