Militants attack Salala check post, one security official killed

Three FC personnel also injured, as militants attack check post late on Monday night.


Our Correspondent June 05, 2012

GHALANAI: At least one security official was killed and three injured when militants attacked the Salala check post in the Baizai subdivision of Mohmand Agency on the Pak-Afghan border late on Monday night, a security official said.

The official in Peshawar claimed that in retaliation, the security forces killed several militants however, their number could not be confirmed.

He said that hundreds of militants attacked the check post in which one official of the Frontier Corps (FC) was killed while three were injured. “A team of security officials lifted and rushed the injured security officials to a hospital,” he said.

In November 2011, Nato forces in Afghanistan attacked the Salala check post and killed 26 security officials of Pakistan. After the attack, Pakistan closed the Nato supply routes to Afghanistan which constrained relations between the governments of Pakistan and US.

COMMENTS (9)

John P | 11 years ago | Reply

Isn't Pakistan supposed to ask the Taliban for an apology? All you have to do after bombing the heck out of the outposts is apologize and everything is back to normal. Sweet. What do you need a military for?

Malik Hamza | 11 years ago | Reply

Its soo ironic and simple that it is simple to understand that USA(CIA) IS training these terrorists and giving them arms , so that they attack our soldiers. We should ask Panetta to give to clear understanding that with all these foreign foces based on the border how is it possible that such large number of miliants can attack our army posts ? are the foreign forces sleeping or are they actually a RORGUE USA,NATO ARMY AND ROGUE SECRET SERVICES SUCH AS CIA, RAW. M15,M16 and other operating secret services.

We need to wake up

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ