Innovations in higher education teaching

Published: June 4, 2012
The writer is associate professor in the departments of Biomedical Engineering and Medicine at Boston University

The writer is associate professor in the departments of Biomedical Engineering and Medicine at Boston University

Discussion of innovation in higher education in Pakistan has become stale and myopic. It is focused on just a handful of areas, with little emphasis on out-of-the-box thinking. Unfortunately, it has also been limited only to research and development with not even lip service being paid to teaching. Yet, the very definition of education in any form requires an act of transmission of knowledge, usually through an active teaching and learning process. The value of education and educational endeavours in Pakistan has never been particularly high. The discussion on good practices in teaching has unfortunately remained focused on primary, secondary and occasionally post-secondary education. The political rhetoric on improving Pakistan’s capacity in science and technology has lacked a fundamental discussion on improving the quality of teaching at our higher education institutions. This, of course, has a feedback effect. We do not emphasise innovation in teaching in our higher education and as a result, few professors take the time out to learn innovative strategies in conveying their message and creating a sense of wonder, inquiry and pursuit of knowledge among our students.

Recently, I had the opportunity to spend some time with faculty from a reputable Pakistani engineering university. The discussion, first over coffee and then over dinner, turned to curriculum innovation and then teaching. Both the faculty members, despite being involved in teaching at this institution for over half a decade, had no input in setting the curriculum or had even thought about bringing innovative tools to their classrooms. Their target, set by their department head, was to give a certain number of quizzes on certain days, a fixed number of exams and in the end they had to finish all the chapters in the assigned book. There was little or no innovation in teaching, curriculum or pedagogy and little was done in terms of teaching quality assessment. Perhaps, as junior or mid-career faculty, they were still in the learning phase of teaching. Yet, what was problematic was that there was no incentive to be innovative in the delivery of the material in the classroom. Any discussion of innovation in teaching, as I found out, was met with scepticism from senior faculty and department administrators. Out-of-the-box styles were aggressively discouraged. While I can understand the necessity of conforming to certain guidelines, I am baffled and disappointed by active pressures to conform to teaching practices that are neither conducive to learning, nor are they creating innovative scholars.

Unfortunately, the experience of these two colleagues is neither unique nor limited to engineering institutions alone. In the higher education sector, we do not engage in innovative tools of pedagogy. For us, teaching a class is synonymous to finishing the curriculum, irrespective of how many students fully understand and appreciate the teaching and the material. Ongoing evaluations and assessments are rare and students, even in their written comments, are reluctant to criticise poor teaching. I am not advocating unnecessary or unfair criticism of teaching. I am simply arguing that we need to emphasise mechanisms that maximise student learning.

In the absence of a clear policy on teaching innovation, I recommend a four-pronged strategy for improving the quality of teaching at our higher education institutions. The first one being to simply celebrate good teaching through awards and recognition at the department, university, regional and national level. We need to give incentives to teachers to improve their quality and create a sense of wonder, inquiry and pursuit of knowledge in our students. Secondly, we need to give small grants to departments to create tutorials and mechanisms for teachers to learn new approaches, to incorporate best practices and implement innovative strategies in the classroom.

Third, the HEC and other national bodies need to create courses, seminars and national symposia on higher education teaching and teacher training workshops. While there is some activity at the primary and secondary level, little is being done at the higher education level. Finally, universities and departments need to take a serious look at their course evaluation forms and need to tailor them to get maximum amount of data that can give insights into student learning and teaching performance. This, along with other means, should give the departments a sense of the quality of teaching and necessary steps to improve them.

Published in The Express Tribune, June 4th, 2012.

Facebook Conversations

Reader Comments (6)

  • Jun 4, 2012 - 1:18PM

    100% agree with you. A little while ago, i wrote on the same topic, that how i can include new learning methodologies in the class as a teacher but even the students had took that as light and diverted their attention towards other courses.


  • Shehzad
    Jun 4, 2012 - 2:13PM

    Good points Dr. Zaman. I think HEC needs to invest in teacher training at higher education as well. It is high time that we take a serious look at what our teachers are providing to our students.


  • Omar
    Jun 4, 2012 - 2:14PM

    I agree with the author. Curriculum reform and improvements in higher education are central to our success. Good research will only be an elusive dream until our institutions are able to maintain a high level of quality education and adapt to the best practices.


  • Zee
    Jun 4, 2012 - 3:18PM

    By the time they reach university, students are so prone to rote learning that they resist anything and anyone that wants them to go beyond the book. I have myself seen students give bad evaluation to teachers who encouraged out of box thinking through case studies and practical applications. the students are content with the teachers that them tell specifically what pages to rote learn.


  • Jun 4, 2012 - 5:15PM

    Agreed with Zee 100%


  • Ahmed
    Jun 4, 2012 - 9:45PM

    Good points. But not all is bleak. Many Pakistan institutions such as GC have traditions of great teaching and great teachers. Also some institutions like LUMS have started putting lots of emphasis on teaching again. The new LUMS VC seems to stress it every time he says anythinf. That is a good sign.


More in Opinion