'I acted to mobilise the world'

Zardari defended his decision of traveling abroad by saying he helped focus international attention on the calamity.

Reuters August 11, 2010

SINGAPORE: President Asif Ali Zardari defended his decision to travel abroad while the country battled the worst floods in decades, saying he had helped focus international attention on the plight of the victims.

In an opinion piece for the Wall Street Journal, he said he had used his trip to France and Britain to mobilise foreign assistance, money and food for the flood victims.

"Some have criticized my decision, saying it represented aloofness, but I felt that I had to choose substance over symbolism," he said.

The British government had pledged $24 million in aid, following his meeting with Prime Minister David Cameron, the president said. He had also been in touch with the US government, which had promised $35 million in relief funds.

"As I return to Pakistan, I bring back tangible results that will help the flood victims in the short run and lay the foundations for national recovery in the long run," Zardari said. "I might have benefited personally from the political symbolism of being in the country at the time of a natural disaster. But hungry people can't eat symbols. The situation demanded action, and I acted to mobilise the world."

Even before the floods struck, Zardari's approval ratings had been falling. Only one in five Pakistanis viewed him positively, a poll by the US-based Pew Research Center released late last month showed.


IOTA | 11 years ago | Reply Pakistan deserves better
John Donne | 11 years ago | Reply Have fun, courtesy Express Tribune. Let kids play, quarrel with each other, run wild here and there, utter abuses to each other. That's the best kids can do. "Bazecha'e atfal hay dunya mere aagey/ hota hay shab-o-rouz tamasha mere agey". But O, fool that thou art, John, who would know what you are talking about? What is this gibberish, Esperanto?
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read