Is it really that simple? Why is it that most of the missing persons belong to a certain ideological and religious conviction? Here, I am not talking about the Baloch. That is a separate matter. This piece focuses on those who have alleged links with radical outfits. In my several years of reporting, I have consistently encountered this situation. Those who are picked up often had some grey areas in their lives due to which they were netted. It is quite understandable that the families often claim their absolute innocence. No one likes to confess to wrongdoing. Quite often the families of persons who have been involved in militancy are unaware of the activities of their relatives.
By focusing solely on the families’ plight, are we overlooking and even ignoring the other side of the story, which is perhaps darker and uglier? Some people are quick to denounce the militants after each terrorist attack and sarcastically point at the public apathy towards such attacks. But I wonder why such reflection is not employed in the story of the missing persons. Why aren’t people ready to even look at the possibility that, alongside the grim tales of torture and illegal detentions, there may also be macabre terrorist plots? Lack of coordination between different law enforcement agencies, weak prosecution, legal lacunae and an outdated law of evidence compound the problem.
I recall several illustrative examples but would cite just one. In 2007, I wrote a feature about the missing persons for The New York Times. One of the persons I interviewed belonged to Gujranwala. Muhammad Tariq was arrested in connection with the assassination attempts on General (retd) Pervez Musharraf. His ordeal in illegal custody was depressing. He denied the charges against him and said he was arrested because he used to give charity to a banned outfit. Some months later, I happened to be outside Adiala Jail in Rawalpindi. A female prisoner was being released. She had also been implicated in a case related to another assassination attempt on Musharraf. Her husband had hidden weapons in their Islamabad apartment and the police claimed that she was an accomplice in the plan. But it couldn’t provide evidence that satisfied the court and she was granted bail. It was late in the night and several people had gathered to receive her. To my surprise, I saw Mr Tariq standing there too. Upon inquiring, he replied that he was there to show solidarity for her. It dawned on me that no matter what is publicly stated, there are always linkages that bind such elements or foster affinity between them.
We must oppose illegalities in the efforts against militancy and terrorism. But such sympathy must not make us blind to the darker shadows that lurk behind the visible stories.
Published in The Express Tribune, May 11th, 2012.
COMMENTS (17)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
A well balanced analysis - rare to find these days. I wish media in today's age learn's from the writer of the article how to analytically portray both sides of the story based on real life experiences and observations. Brilliant!!! A must read
A realistic analysis. The author had genuinely pointed out the missing link. I am sure the court and the media knows it all but for reasons unknown make an issue of a non issue. I m sure agencies do not have personal grudges against such people,
Affirmative. Truly a balanced and a poignant post. The good cop and a bad cop concept must not be 'conveniently ignored' by the top leadership. The writer has mentioned a factual picture and needless to say that justice and power must be brought together, so that whatever is just may be powerful, and whatever is powerful may be just. Thanks a lot for being 'just'.
Every society and country runs on the basis of laws and equal Justice is promised to all. If terrorists cannot be convicted because laws are infirm, terrorists sympathizers abound or witnesses are threatened - the lacunae needs to be addressed. Law enforcement agencies cannot take on the role of a kangaroo court and dispense justice as they see fit.
To summarize the author's ingenious argument: No evidence has been found that missing persons are terrorists. So let them be punished on suspicion.
What's the author's point? That media should paint these guys as terrorists because the intelligence agencies suspect them of conspiring in a terrorist plot?
In the eyes of the law, a person is either guilty or not. IF there is not enough evidence to convict, what should the media do - turn a blind eye to their abduction, torture and disappearance because they have gray areas in their lives?
There is a simple choice here: Pakistan can either become a country where rule of law prevails or it can become a lawless failed state. With journalists collaborating with intelligence agencies to legitimize illegal detention and disapperarance, we've taken a step closer to being a failed state.
I'm sure plenty have links. But, the very fact they have links could allow this illegal detention to be legal if only they were charged with it. Have I not seen charges pressed on officials having alleged links to banned groups? What's stopping such charges being submitted on those they pick up? Without them doing it they take attention away from what would be positive publicity for them and instead turn it into them being yelled at for the hundredth time for acting as though they are superior to all other institutions and can get away with whatever they want resulting in a fight for dominance at the expense of positive developments. I'm sure public opinions would change if they did. I'm also quite sure it wouldn't draw the political-attention-seeking SC so much, either, in any way other than something that would have to be positive for the innocent and negative for the terrorist organizations.
"But first, for the record, there is no denying that the law should be supreme ..."
Media is only highlighting that in the case of the abducted persons the law is not being followed ... THAT, certainly is a slam dunk case and due to the human suffering it creates it must be highlighted ad nauseum.
@Said Chaudhry: where is the balance in this analysis ?
Great article. Although I hate most politicians, I think that we are way too critical of them. Maybe there actually was a good reason to abduct those people. Remember, our agencies/government cant't disclose everything to the public; they have to be discreet about some things. Again, I'm not saying we shouldn't question such issues, but should also look at the other possibilities.
@Ashok: It is clear that he meant that the issue of the Baloch was a separate matter, completely different from the cases of those with links to terrorist organisations and therefore, mentioning it in this article would have been inappropriate. He definitely does not appear to be trivialising that issue.
I second ashok here.
fairly written, and boldly acknowledged, the side that's conveniently ignored owing to herd behaviours!!!
great analysis. balanced and on point.
Why "missing" Baloch are different from non-Baloch "missing" persons?
Let us call a spade a spade. These are NOT "missing" persons. They are ABDUCTED persons.
May be missing-abducted persons if not presented in the court after abduction.
What a brave article. wonderfully written.Bravo!