AQIM to 'free Brit' if Qatada let go where he wants: Report

AQIM also threatened that Britain would 'open door of evil' if it sent cleric back to his native Jordan.

Afp April 30, 2012

DAKAR: Militants have offered to free a British-South African hostage if London allows cleric Abu Qatada to choose a country for his extradition, US monitoring service SITE said.

Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) also threatened that Britain would "open the door of evil" and put its people at risk if it sent the cleric back to his native Jordan where he faces jail, the report said.

AQIM – al Qaeda's North African franchise – has been holding Stephen Malcolm, 37, and two other Western men hostage since abducting them last November in the north Mali city of Timbuktu.

Britain's interior ministry, the Home Office, declined to comment on the al Qaeda offer, while the Foreign Office in London said they did not normally comment on kidnapping cases.

For more than six years, Britain has been trying to deport Abu Qatada to Jordan, where the cleric was convicted in absentia in 1998 of involvement in terror attacks.

Videos of the cleric's sermons were found in the Hamburg flat used by some of the hijackers in the September 11, 2001 attacks, while he has also defended killing Jews and attacks on Americans.

The cleric's removal was blocked in January by the European Court of Human Rights, which cited the risk that evidence obtained from torture would be used against him on his return to Jordan.

Abu Qatada, who has been detained in Britain for most of the past decade on terrorism-related allegations, successfully appealed for bail following the ruling and was released under strict conditions in February.

Britain subsequently sought assurances from Jordan that would allay the European court's concerns, with Prime Minister David Cameron personally calling King Abdullah II and Home Secretary Theresa May visiting Jordan last month.

British officials believe the high-level diplomacy cleared the way to deport the cleric, and he was re-arrested by immigration officials.

However, the European court is now considering another appeal by the cleric.

The SITE report said AQIM had offered a deal, "to release a hostage if the British government allows cleric Abu Qatada al-Filistini (the Palestinian) the opportunity to choose a country for his extradition".

The group had declared on jihadist forums on Sunday "that it has followed Abu Qatada's case for years, and that Britain will open the 'door of evil' unto its country and citizens should it extradite him to Jordan".

"The group said that it will release Stephen Malcolm, who has dual British and South African nationality, if Britain will extradite Abu Qatada to a country involved in the Arab Spring or to any country he chooses," SITE said.

The AQIM call emerged as Britain was mourning another hostage, aid worker Khalil Dale, whose decapitated body was found near the Pakistani city of Quetta on Sunday.

He was seized in January but a decision was taken to keep the case quiet.

Britain has a stated policy of refusing to pay ransoms for hostages.

The northern part of Mali in the vast Sahel region has been under the control of militants, including AQIM and Ansar Dine, as well as separatist Tuareg rebels, for more than a month.

The insurgents took advantage of the power vaccuum created by a March 22 army coup in the capital Bamako in the country's south, and the fabled desert city of Timbuktu is now in their hands.

The remote region has long been a haven for drug and arms smugglers as well as extremist groups, and has seen a spate of kidnappings in Mali as well as Algeria and Niger. AQIM is now holding nine Western hostages.

Human Rights Watch on Monday accused rebels and militant groups in the north of war crimes during the past few weeks of fighting and chaos.


Pollack | 9 years ago | Reply

AQ asking for this mans freedom is proof enough that Qatada is a guilty man. Britain should send that man back to Jordan to face justice.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read