The first thought, when confronted with a tragedy of the magnitude of the Bhoja Air crash that killed everyone on board, is to mourn the unnecessary loss of life and offer condolences to the friends and families of all the victims. As appropriate an emotion as grief is at this moment, it is also accompanied by anger. This is the second plane to have crashed in the vicinity of Islamabad in less than two years with bad weather initially assumed to have played a role in both crashes. There is no reason why Islamabad should become a new Bermuda Triangle, which is why we need answers as quickly as possible. This time there should be no scapegoating, no obfuscation, no delays and no cover-ups. What we want — actually what we need — is the unfiltered truth if we are ever to feel safe in the skies again.
The first obvious target in the investigation into the crash will be Bhoja Air itself. The airline had only resumed operations last month after a decade-long hiatus. It needs to be ascertained if this airplane should have been in the skies in the first place. Media reports indicate that it was over 40 years old and knowing as we do the shortcuts that are taken in this industry — indeed the country as a whole — there can be no guarantee that the aircraft was properly maintained. The age and experience of the pilot, too, needs to be investigated. Stormy weather can always be a major risk for an aircraft but experienced pilots have the ability to skilfully navigate treacherous conditions. At the same time, each and every aircraft in Bhoja Air’s fleet needs to be thoroughly checked to see if they meet safety standards. Until then, it would be best to suspend the airline’s operations. Any financial losses Bhoja Air suffers pale in comparison to the risk those airplanes may pose to the flying public. Putting Farooq Bhoja, the head of Bhoja Air, on the exit control list and conducting an investigation that is thorough and far-reaching would be a start but the government must show that this is not a mere public relations exercise.
The next obvious avenue of investigation is the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA). As the main regulatory body of the industry, it is the CAA’s job to carry out an impartial investigation. We hope that this will be the case, but the CAA’s role does not stop with simply dealing with the aftermath of a plane crash. It is the job of the regulatory body to ensure safety on all aircraft to minimise the chances of such crashes in the first place. There is reason to believe that the CAA may have failed on this account. For one, it is mainly staffed by former employees of the airlines themselves, creating an undeniable conflict of interest. Then, the performance of the CAA in investigating the Airblue crash two years ago was also not up to the standards one expects from a regulator. That crash was blamed entirely on pilot error, in a report so shoddy and erroneous, that the Peshawar High Court rejected it and had to demand a new report that used impartial international experts only.
This time around, more information needs to be shared with the public about the circumstances of the crash. With the Airblue crash, we were never allowed access to the full transcript of the cockpit voice recorder and the digital flight data recorder. Since both the airlines and the regulatory authority are trusted by no one, such transparency is essential to ensure an investigation that has the confidence of the public.
Ultimately, the Courts too will have to get involved. Justice needs to be done at both the emotional level, by providing families of the crash victims’ closure through an impartial investigation, as well as the financial level, to compensate those who lost bread-earners and loved ones. After its crash, Airblue only gave compensation to those who promised not to pursue further legal action against the airline. The Courts cannot allow similar agreements now. In the end, it may be up to the judiciary to ensure that we get answers and not another cover-up.
Published in The Express Tribune, April 22nd, 2012.
COMMENTS (7)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
1713246307-0/OIP-(2)1713246307-0-270x192.webp)
_updates1713245447-0/1178596_7858743_Salman-Khan-(2)_updates1713245447-0-270x192.webp)
The cover picture of the article is so heartbreaking that I could not stop my tears which rolled down from my cheeks when I first saw the picture.
My Al-Mighty Allah given strength to all the loved ones of those innocent passengers who were on the Bhoja Airline ill fated flight. Ameen
The passengers never knew that they were boarding on a death flight from where one cannot come back.
ET really didn't have to put this lady's picture here. Unless you've asked for her permission, which I very much doubt. Express and most other media outlets could do with some capacity building exercises on the 'ethics of journalism'. Even if the photographer was comfortable with invading into someone's gut-wrenching outburst of emotion, where was that horde of sub-editors and editors when this was making its way to the paper? Needless to say, the irony of this appearing in an editorial makes the ET look exceptionally callous.
Every article on the Bhoja crash on ET has a poll at the end asking whether the media handled the situation right. If you want to take a higher moral ground on such issues, at least look like you're trying to do the right thing yourself. Please, do change this and try to take a lead on making the country's media more responsible.
This is a good Editorial. But I must object to your calling the AB crash investigation report a "cover-up". Have you read it? Is the judge an expert in air accident investigation? Has his Lordship ever read one in his life?
True, the report was rather perfunctory and only 38 pages long against an international standard of at least 200 pages and lots of annexures, 3-D maps and so on. The CVR and DFDR are printed out in full. Some even include a computer-generated simulation of the final moments of a crash. The training record of the pilots are there; the life history of the aircraft and its engines is there. None of these things were in the AB report which is what made it all-too-brief, as though prepared in a hurry.
If the judge has ordered another investigation, that is great if it makes people happy. Nothing will change the conclusion of the first report. But even after the second report, the conspiracy theories will not die. Please don't become a part of them.
What ever was the reason of crash.....i will blame CAA only....every approval went through CAA....and CAA will try it's best to cover-up their BS as they did in Airblue crash
i am very sadden to read this news, but i will pray for them in my salaat, may ALLAH SUBHAN O TA ALA give them janatull firdosh AMEEN.
Being the editorial, I would expect a little more research and a little leas heresay. The aircraft was not 40+ year old 'as the media would have you believe'. The airframe had clocked about 28 years but even that is irrelevant. The structural integrity of plane largely depends on no. of cycles (take off + land) and not the age on years ... Please if you can't put rumors to rest then at least don't fan them!
I would like to know how mich fuel the plane was carrying (was captain forced to make the landing?) and if had missed any required maintenance checks.
Pakistan has been Bermuda Triangle since nov 2001.