Kabul attacks will help US press Pakistan: Analysts

Published: April 20, 2012
An Afghan National Army soldier keeps watch near the Provincial Reconstruction Team (PRT) as a NATO helicopter flies over the site of an attack in Jalalabad province April 15, 2012. PHOTO: REUTERS/FILE

An Afghan National Army soldier keeps watch near the Provincial Reconstruction Team (PRT) as a NATO helicopter flies over the site of an attack in Jalalabad province April 15, 2012. PHOTO: REUTERS/FILE

ISLAMABAD: The weekend attacks on Kabul, blamed by the US on the Haqqani network, will strengthen Washington’s hand in talks with Islamabad over drone strikes and NATO supply routes, analysts say.

The US ambassador to Afghanistan Ryan Crocker said Thursday the attacks – the biggest to hit the Afghan capital in 10 years of war – were planned by Haqqani leaders in North Waziristan.

US Secretary of State Hilary Clinton said Washington will continue to urge Pakistan to “squeeze” the Haqqani network, comments echoed by Crocker, who said the US was “pressing the Pakistanis very hard” for action against the militants.

A senior official with the Inter-Services Intelligence agency (ISI), told AFP that after what happened in Kabul this kind of pressure from Washington was expected.

“Our apprehension right from the beginning has been that the US will use the Kabul attacks as a pretext to resume drone strikes with increased vigour, put pressure on Pakistan to launch operations in North Waziristan and re-open the NATO supply route,” the official said.

Islamabad and Washington are trying to patch up a fractured relationship that lurched from crisis to crisis last year and reached a low after a US air strike inadvertently killed 24 Pakistani soldiers at a border post in November.

Pakistan closed its border to convoys supplying NATO troops in Afghanistan in response to that incident and a parliamentary review of ties last week called for an end to US drone strikes within Pakistani territory.

Analysts say the Kabul attacks give the US greater scope to lean on Pakistan in talks to reopen the supply lines and continue drone strikes.

“The US pressure can increase in future both in terms of re-opening NATO supplies or taking action against the Haqqanis,” security analyst Hasan Askari said.

“Re-opening of the supply route is the top and foremost priority for the US. If Pakistan does not re-open the supply route, then they will exert all sorts of pressures.”

The United States blames the Haqqanis, who are closely affiliated with the Taliban, for fuelling the 10-year insurgency in Afghanistan, attacking US-led NATO troops and working to destabilise the Western-backed government of Afghan President Hamid Karzai.

Washington significantly stepped up demands last year on Pakistan to take action against the network, which it blames for a series of attacks including a 19-hour siege of the American embassy in Kabul on September 13.

But Pakistan’s military says it is overstretched fighting local Taliban to launch an offensive against the Haqqanis in North Waziristan.

“There is no question of any new military offensive in North Waziristan as our troops are currently engaged in consolidating the gains in other northwestern and tribal regions, where operations were earlier conducted,” the ISI official said.

“Pakistan’s position on drone strikes is very clear – we will not allow any drone strikes in future,” the ISI official said.

“We are capable of doing it by ourselves. They should tell us the target and we can successfully neutralise it.”

But analyst Imtiaz Gul, who has written several books on Afghanistan, said there was no chance of the US giving up the drone campaign, which it regards as a highly effective tool in the fight against al Qaeda-linked militants.

“We should not be under any illusion that Americans will stop drone attacks or the CIA will stop pursuing al Qaeda targets,” he said.

“Once formal talks resume between Pakistan and the US on the resumption of NATO supplies and other issues, the US may alter the modus operandi by creating a facade of joint ownership for drone attacks.”

Facebook Conversations

Reader Comments (14)

  • Roflcopter
    Apr 20, 2012 - 3:58PM

    US still thinks they can win this war


  • bangash
    Apr 20, 2012 - 7:09PM


    US losing doesn’t mean Pakistan is winning.


  • Straight Fire
    Apr 20, 2012 - 8:17PM

    Atleast US is losing, that’s already a win win situation …


  • Apr 20, 2012 - 8:52PM

    Pakistan cannot be pressed any longer………….. Time is over.


  • G.A.
    Apr 20, 2012 - 10:27PM

    We had enough experiences and lessons till now… time to start working on reason for which we are made. Opportunities may not come time and again…


  • Noise
    Apr 21, 2012 - 12:11AM

    @straight fire
    When everyone loses, no one wins except the scavengers


  • Troll
    Apr 21, 2012 - 12:42AM

    @Khalid Masood:
    @Straight Fire:
    USA has already won the war after they killed OBL. Their war is long over. What they are doing now is cleaning up Pakistan’s mess which is so arrogantly protecting as strategic assets. So if they pull out before completing this process they are not loosing, it will be you who will inherit overload of terrorists. And Yeah…Good Luck with controlling them without USA’s help. Damn Your army cannot even keep in check the terrorists who daily kill people within Pakistan. Already in other article in tribune Pakistan has started begging USA fo rcoal project. So you guys are so thankless and shameful people that at one hand you beg and at same time you wish your donor looses the war. Typical of Pakistani mindset, isn’t it? It is clear why people all over the world looks at Pakistani as deceitful beings.
    Anyways, it is just your wishful thinking that “USA” is loosing war. If at all anyone are loosing here are people of Afghanistan and Pakistan.


  • G.A.
    Apr 21, 2012 - 3:45AM

    @Troll: Its truth that it really hurts when losers are called losers…But its not fair to keep on blaming others and moreover talking ill for them…you are saying america won…when??? It never won nor it will in its self created futile war…Giving OBL as justification does not conceal the ground reality… You do not need to worry about Pakistan, we can see things very clearly, who is our enemy and who is our friend it is most clear than ever before and we can protect ourselves very well now. It is only america on whom the craze of being greatest world power is not letting it to follow the right and fair path.


  • vasan
    Apr 21, 2012 - 6:08AM

    Troll : Very well said. Very very valid points. One more to add is that US got most of the conspirators of 9/11 disaster, caught in Pakistan and sold by Pakistan to US


  • A2Z
    Apr 21, 2012 - 7:17AM

    So when US is attacked by someone, its their right to Pakistan but when Pakistani soldiers were killed by US they should not even ask for apology…f off US


  • observer
    Apr 21, 2012 - 8:30AM


    US still thinks they can win this war

    The Afghan Forces killed all the 36 attackers.

    The Bannu forces surrendered 400.

    I guess Bannu forces must be winning.

    Where is my handful of salt?


  • Ahmer Ali
    Apr 21, 2012 - 9:31AM

    Kabul attack by the Taliban has proven that USA is loosing the war in Afghanistan and also facing the most ever worst defeat as well and most especially importantly Taliban have proven US’ leaders’ false,fabricated and embellished statement in which they said that Taliban’s backbone has been broken and Taliban has proven that they are not defeated and are united and strong till now and can attack any where any time.Now US’ leaders must have to learn the lesson from USSR’s defeat (USSR the super power of that time) by the Taliban and leave Afghanistan as soon as possible on priority basis so that US’ and NATO’s officials couldn’t face more and more damages and losses of billions of $$$$$$,military’s vehicles,war’s equipments and weapons,troops’ lives and most especially importantly more and more innocent people couldn’t be killed.


  • Noise
    Apr 21, 2012 - 6:00PM

    @Ahmer Ali
    The Taliban attack on Kabul was futile and a failure and bottom line was that Afghan security forces killed every one of the attackers and caught a couple alive who pointed their finger at Pakistan and North Waziristan. It was an intelligence victory for Afghanistan.

    The Afghans would never have won against the USSR if the Americans were not arming them an funding them and training them and helping them through the CIA and other covert agencies. I think being their former patrons the Americans know how full of excrement the Taliban is. Besides the Taliban do not represent the large proportion of Afghans that aren’t pathans. That is why they couldn’t unite Afghanistan before and what non-pashtun areas they manged to take they had to control through brutal force and when the Americans came the people turned against the Taliban and took their revenge.


  • j. von hettlingen
    Apr 22, 2012 - 3:06AM

    Does the ISI want to go after the Haqqani militants? If yes when? Hilary Clinton has been urging Islamabad to “squeeze” the network. Pakistani’s military replied it’s busy fighting the home-grown Taliban and has no time for the Haqqani militants in North Wazirstan. So the U.S. takes the matter in its own hands!


More in World