Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, five others charged for planning, executing 9/11 attacks

They will face an arraignment 30 days from being serviced the charges. They could face death penalty if convicted.


Press Release April 04, 2012

WASHINGTON: The US department of defence has charged Khalid Sheikh Mohammed among five people for planning and executing the attacks on September 11, 2001, which resultantly killed 2,976 people. The charges mean the accused could face the death penalty if convicted.

A release from the department said that the Office of Military Commissions had referred charges to a military commission in the case of "United States v. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Walid Muhammad Salih Mubarak Bin 'Attash, Ramzi Binalshibh, Ali Abdul Aziz Ali, and Mustafa Ahmed Adam al Hawsawi.

Per the release, with the case being referred to the capital military commission means, if convicted, the five accused could be sentenced to death. It added that according to the reforms in the Military Commissions Act of 2009, each of the five accused have been provided, in addition to their detailed defense counsel, learned counsel, possessing specialised knowledge and experience in death penalty cases, to assist them in their defense.

According to the charge sheets, the five accused are charged with terrorism, hijacking aircraft, conspiracy, murder in violation of the law of war, attacking civilians, attacking civilian objects, intentionally causing serious bodily injury, and destruction of property in violation of the law of war. The convening authority has referred all charges to a joint trial.

The release further added that the five accused will be arraigned at Naval Station Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, within 30 days of service of the referred charges upon them. Additionally, in accordance with Military Commissions rules and procedures, the chief judge of the Military Commissions Trial Judiciary will assign a military judge to the case.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ