Nevertheless within days, some five thousand of his men made it across and joined Jalaluddin. Eastward across the Kala Chitta Mountains the man went to make peace with Rai Sangin, the Khokar chieftain of the area around Kallar Kahar. In the furrowed hills west of the Gambhir River, there is a ruined fort called Samarkand that may recall that long ago friendship. But that is another tale.
Meanwhile, relaxing in the Peshawar valley (and indulging in wanton rape) the Khan heard of the Sultan’s swelling ranks. He may also have heard that the man had petitioned Sultan Shamsuddin Iyultimish of Delhi for asylum. Even as the Delhi throne refused, Chengez Khan sent a force to get Jalaluddin. Taking reinforcements from the Khokars, Jalaluddin fled south to Multan.
Multan’s governor Nasiruddin Qabacha ruled as a proxy of the Delhi Sultan. Instigated by the Salt Range, Khokars who had a score to settle with Qabacha, Jalaluddin attacked and routed the Multan garrison and advanced on Uch, the second capital of Sindh. Qabacha fled to Bhakkar, the island fortress between Rohri and Sukkur. Having acquired considerable booty from the Uch and Multan treasuries, Jalaluddin returned to summer in the Salt Range.
As summer drew to an end, Chengez Khan sent yet another sortie to flush out Jalaluddin once and for all. The man again fled south. He vented his spleen on Multan and Uch — and that was only for starters. The largely Muslim cities were given up to rape and plunder. Even in the 13th century Uch was already a religious centre but that did not stop the frustrated and cowardly fugitive from giving it up to sword and fire.
With the Mongols still breathing down his neck, Jalaluddin fled south. Bhakkar and Rohri, where Qabacha was holed up, went up in smoke. Here we have a rather tantalising aside. As the Khawarazmians came up against the massive walls of the island fortress from the north, Qabacha, having tasted the defeat and looting of his treasury in Multan and Uch, attempted to get away with his wealth. Loading it up in the royal boat, he set sail southward in an attempt to get to Thatta.
Evidently, the governor and his crew were in a state of great angst and confusion. The Tabqat-e-Nasiri, a contemporary and reliable history, tells us that barely out of bowshot from Bhakkar, the crew in its haste to get away managed to overturn the boat midstream. The treasure went into the brown summer eddies of a swollen Sindhu and Qabacha went down, never to re-emerge from the waters.
So far as we know, the treasure was never recovered. And so it is that somewhere, just downstream of the crumbling ramparts of Bhakkar, there lies to this day a good deal of wealth. In the intervening eight centuries, it may have been covered by metres of Sindhu silt. But it is still there nevertheless.
Meanwhile, Jalaluddin the great hero of Islamic history, bore ever southward. The glorious city of Pari Nagar in the Thar Desert faced his frustration and never rose up from the flames he set upon it. Bhambore on the seaboard, a rich and celebrated port, too went up in smoke, its population, Muslim and non-Muslim alike, put to the sword.
Having visited his anger upon this land, Jalaluddin withdrew to what is now Iraq. He hoped to displace his brother, a minor chieftain in that country. The brother, however, considered the land too small for the two siblings. He bribed a Kurd to do Jalaluddin in. And so it was that the man we consider an Islamic hero for destroying the largely Muslim cities of Multan, Uch and Bhakkar was mercilessly stabbed to death on the orders of his own brother.
Published in The Express Tribune, February 18th, 2012.
COMMENTS (19)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Izhar
A. His only source is Tareekh-e-Jahankusha.
B. For the events which took place on this side of Indus, Salman Rashid’s source is Tabqat-e-Nasiri.
To an uninitiated person, that is 'two' sources, which is more than 'only'. Care to cite some sources of your own? Specially a source that says that the 'shameful' (as opposed to shameless) Jalaluddin did not actually loot, sack, rape, and murder Multan, Uch and Parinagar.
I do not think Jalal ud Din Khawrzam Shah has ever been claimed by us Pakistanis as our hero. These were the characters in history who lived and died in the prevalent environments much different than today's world. My point was that can we locate Din Kot or Dhingot, the site of battle and make use of it and other numerous battle grounds as tourist destinations for those who are interested in history.
And thank you Salman Rashid Sahib for giving us clue to some hidden treasures.
Shocking...Wonder who is a hero in our history? Khawarzim was always ranked in high esteems and the writer here makes me feel otherwise...May the dead ones forgiven and may the living ones mind their ways...History was and present is at our hands...Lets not derail presently...
The highest peak of Cherat hill is still called "Jalal a Sar". I think that the topic is up for a well researched book. Any takers? The writer willake a name for him/ her self.
An eye-opener for those who get 'high' on the 'pride' of Muslim 'glory'(?)
This article will not be accepted by "brainwashed" majority of Pakistani youth.. But keep on writing . At times re-socialization of society works..
@Izhar: good points!
leaving aside snide remarks like shameless etc .......it is good to learn about greats warriors and their real doings .......
This is what we proudly call Muslim glory. Ruthless killers, their plunder, forts and downtrodden subjects. I wish someone like Mr. Salman Rashid would write history with perspective of downtrodden lots.
Dear Salman sahib, great article. Nonethless, Jalaluddin must have killed thousands of Hindus in Multan . I guess the moneyed people were hindus. If he took considerable booty from Multan, lots of dead Hindus must have been the effect. This Hindu blood shed sadly makes him a great Islamic leader. The fact that he killed muslims also does not matter to historians.
Even contemporary dictators like Saddam Hussain or Mullah Umar or killers like OBL are treated as heros by significant number of Muslims. I don't know what is it that people love them for, it still beats me.
@Lala salman ji, Tried to write nice novel story but did not complete it only hate against great Jalaludin khwarz m and did not bother to mention what happend to salman great leader Changez khan when Dehli sultan Iltutmish send it his son to finish tataris barberians junglis wehshis and he killed and then convert it to great civilization and teach them a manners please shed some light on this too lala jis.
I think Mr Salman Rashid misses an important point. Even in 1947, West Pakistan had 25% Hindu/Sikh population. Multan, Lahore, Karachi were almost 50% or more non-Muslims. So in 13th century, the majority of people who lived in W Pakistan were Hindus and affluent. So yes, Mr Jalaluddin Kwrazm, killed thousands and thousands of Muslims, but he must have killed many more thousands Hindus and that fact makes him a hero in the eyes of some Islamic historians.
Any effort to correct the doctored, fabricated and totally false history of Pakistan's ancestors, must be opposed. The 2-nation theory , invented by greatest social scientist the world has ever known, rests on it.
Nothing like a piece of real history as opposed to stodgy ideological nonsense that elevates the likes of Jalaluddin Khwarazm, Sirajudaullah of Bengal and their like to bogus heroes.
love your articles. very well researched and interesting!