The hearing on Balochistan in Washington sparked a sense of urgency among some in parliament, but was unable to solicit a response from the government.
Obsessed with securing support for its chronically deferred 20th Amendment, postponed for a seventh time, the government paid little heed to questions raised by lawmakers on Balochistan’s volatile situation in the National Assembly session on Friday.
Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani heard the points of orders raised by members from Balochistan, but left the house without issuing any response.
“Why is the prime minister not responding to the issue [of Balochistan],” asked ruling Pakistan Peoples Party’s (PPP) lawmaker from the province, Mir Humayun Aziz Kurd.
“Tell us in clear terms why the army is not accepting [the Baloch people] so that we could take a decision … in case we are unacceptable,” Kurd said.
He suggested the government take immediate and concrete steps to address grievances of the province, instead of mere commitments.
“What is the contribution of the special committee [headed by PPP leader Syed Khursheed Shah] in addressing the issues of Balochistan,” Kurd added.
He also demanded the elimination of the role of security and intelligence agencies from the province.
Kurd was seconded by Yaqoob Bizanjo who asked the premier if he had any plan to bring peace to Balochistan.
“You have to tell us before it is too late and we are no more in this house,” he said.
Bizanjo added that “none of the political parties took an initiative to resolve the issue of Balochistan as they did in developing consensus over constitutional amendments.”
Bushra Gohar from the Awami National Party questioned the efficacy of the parliamentary committee on the province: “The issue of Balochistan is being discussed in the US; what are our committees doing in this regard?”
The only government functionary to respond was Interior Minister Rehman Malik who offered to give a briefing to parliamentarians about the status of the Aghaz-e-Haqooq-e-Balochistan package, the role of Frontier Constabulary (FC) and other related issues next week.
Malik said his statement of asking Senator Lashkar Raisani to make disgruntled youth lay down their arms was misconstrued, and that it meant to give a ‘good message’ to the public.
MQM seeks explanation from ANP
Muttahida Qaumi Movement’s Dr Farooq Sattar asked ANP’s Ilyas Bilour to explain his statement wherein the latter claimed that ANP had reined in the MQM in Karachi.
“Bilour confessed at a television talk show that ANP’s Sindh leadership was involved in killing of MQM workers and other people in previous years … and for having done so, they are being prized with party ticket for Senate elections,” Sattar said.
He demanded an apology from Bilour and asked the government and the Supreme Court to take notice.
Responding to the MQM leader, Bushra Gohar said that the ANP does not believe in what was alleged and that the MQM must recognise her party’s sacrifices in Karachi.
Earlier, Zafar Baig Bhittani raised his voice against the recent spate of drone attacks in tribal areas.
“The government swung into action after the deaths of 24 jawans of establishment but there is no response after the deaths of tribal people,” he said.
Meanwhile, Law Minister Moula Bakhsh Chandio said the government would table the 20th Amendment Bill on February 14 (Tuesday).
Balochistan hearing ill-advised: Sherry
Pakistan’s ambassador to US Sherry Rehman forcefully raised the issue of an exclusive hearing on Balochistan by a House Foreign Affairs sub-committee during a meeting with senior US administration officials and members of Congress, according to a Pakistani embassy spokesperson in Washington.
Ambassador Rehman said the government of Pakistan strongly rejects the purpose and findings of the hearing and considers it an “ill-advised and ill-considered” move that will have serious repercussions for Pakistan-US relations.
She claimed the hearing was marked by a “blatant disregard for history and inflammatory use of selective facts,” according to the spokesperson.
Balochistan is an integral part of the Pakistani federation, the ambassador said, adding that the Pakistan government is committed to protecting fundamental rights and freedoms in all parts of Pakistan, including Balochistan, and has initiated an extensive package of constitutional and other reforms to empower its citizens.
“This kind of exercise constitutes interference in Pakistan’s internal affairs. The hearing will add to suspicions in Pakistan about the US motives in the region,” the Pakistani envoy said, adding that it is deeply regrettable that the legislature of a country that calls itself a friend of Pakistan should allow itself to be used as a platform by those advocating the dismemberment of Pakistan.
(Read: A hearing on Balochistan)
With additional input from APP
Published in The Express Tribune, February 11th, 2012.
COMMENTS (15)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Americans are worried about Balochistan problem but what are they doing about their own Red Indian Reserves where the original owners of the State lived once and now are living in worst conditions.Just take a drive there and look for yourself.Similarly have the Americans had any Congressional Hearing about this orfor the Canadian Aboriginals or native Indians????
@IFTIKHAR-UR-REHMAN: innocent punjabi not interested in looting natural resources.
Inshallah Baluchistan will reamain with PAK. As a muslim I sincerely pray to Allah(swt) that PAK remains united and gives a fitting reply to the Indo-US ploy to divide muslim states. Most important thing is that you still have the patriotic ISI and CHINA by your side. Iran also has stake in PAKs favour. And chinese won't sit ideal if the US makes a dirty move.
@Predeep
Look who is talking, why Indians cry when Pakistan provides "political and diplomatic support" to Kishmiri Muslims in Indian Held Kishmir ?
Government should go for long over due massive development in Balochistan diretly to ordinary citizens bypassing these FOR SALE Sardars....plus plan for war !!!
C'mon... US is just providing "political and diplomatic support" for the right to self determination of the Balochis. Sounds familiar?
America has no right to interfere in Pakistan's internal matters, Human rights Organization's only go after small prey's
Baluchs should stand up for their rights and dignity BUT they should be careful from the wolves in sheep's clothing. Americans don't care about Baluchs or Baluchistan; it is a colonial camouflage to grab its resources and encircle Iran. Americans are not, were never and will never be anyone's friend except their own interests.
@Kh: I agree with you plus they(USA) also want to benefit from the minerals like GOLD,COPPER, OIL AND GAS of Balochistan
This issue has been burning for a very long time and the youth in Baluchistan are not interested in 'sardars.' They are literate, semi-literate and want their bread and butter. The US and its allies are just stoking the fire because it is getting an inbuilt resistance movement by default.
Salams to Pakistan
vote for change vote for imran khan
Sleeping government ... burning Pakistan... real situation..
Its not abt the rights of balochis its about america securing the channel to get the caspian oil out. And for that balochistan shud be separate.
Perhaps he knows that Balochistan has gone out of the hand ??
US agenda seems to be having independent Baluchistan as a buffer territory between rest of Pakistan and Afghanistan .... ???