
For that, at least some credit should be given to the Women’s Protection Bill of 2006 which made rape a civil rather than religious issue, allowing cases to be tried in criminal courts. This meant that the near impossible stipulation that four witnesses were needed for a successful rape conviction could be done away with and replaced with forensic and medical evidence. Authorities now must take action on other reported rape cases and ensure that they are quickly brought to trial. There is, however, the need to dissent on one point in the way the case was decided. It is an indictment of the lethargy of Pakistan’s judicial system that the case had to originally be heard by an anti-terrorism court. An amendment to the Pakistan Anti-Terrorism Ordinance in 1999 expanded the definition of terrorists to include those who commit “an act of gang rape, child molestation, or robbery coupled with rape.” If justice was provided speedily, as it should, we would not need to be so cavalier in defining terrorism.
Published in The Express Tribune, August 2nd, 2010.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ