This selfish sipah salar must go

Indian army chief General VK Singh wants the Supreme Court to change his official year of birth from 1950 to 1951.


Aakar Patel January 21, 2012

Backed by feudal and martial Punjabis, the general presses his case in court.

He pressures the government into extending his term. He clings to office, denying promotion to his brother officers. He puts the army in confrontation with the government and he does so for personal honour. We’re not talking of Pakistan here, incidentally.

India’s army chief General VK Singh wants the Supreme Court to change his official year of birth from 1950 to 1951. This will help him stay as chief for another year. 1950 is the year he himself filled on his service commission form. 1951 is on his school-leaving certificate. He has been promoted on the basis of the earlier date, which he says he filled by mistake when he joined the army. On learning of the problem before he was made general, the defence ministry pressed him three times to accept 1950 as the official date or face action. Three times Gen Singh said he would accept the government’s decision. This was discovered in 2006 and Gen Singh then wrote: “Whatever decision is taken in the organisational interest is acceptable to me.”

On receiving this assurance from the soldier, presumably a man of his word, the government promoted him to full general. Once he got what he wanted, he turned nasty.

The organisational interests have now aligned with the army chief’s personal interests. Gen Singh claims that this is a battle for honour and integrity and not tenure. And yet in court he demands that the government change the date and “grant all consequential reliefs thereto”. What might these reliefs be? The extension of his term.

Granting this will mean that other generals will lose out on the chance to become army chief. The army’s succession pattern will be disturbed.

The former chief minister of Punjab Captain (retd) Amrinder Singh, inheritor of the abolished kingdom of Patiala, has come out in support of Gen Singh. A Congress politician, he is angling for the votes of retired and serving faujis from Punjab, which goes to the polls in the next few weeks. He believes India’s soldiers are all in favour of Gen Singh. The army chief’s supporters make the claim that in this tawdry matter of Gen Singh’s extension, the morale of the army will be affected. Really? Are our jawans so fragile? Will Singh’s serving another ten months restore their fighting spirit? And if their morale is actually being affected, should their boss not put the army’s interests before his own honour? Instead he has sneaked off to court.

Gen Singh is not known for his restraint or his thoughtfulness. This is to be expected from soldiers, but he’s our most senior warrior and should know better than shoot his mouth off.

After Marines killed Osama bin Laden in Abbottabad, Gen Singh was asked by journalists if India could carry out such a military operation. “I would like to say that only this that if such a chance comes, then all three arms (of the military) are competent to do this,” he said.

What was the need to say this? It is difficult to understand.

On Anna Hazare’s circus Gen Singh said this was “the power of democracy”. No, it wasn’t. Rousing a mob against parliament is not democratic, it is a challenge to rule of law.

How does such a man become India’s army chief? It is of course because of India’s seniority rule. This is how the bureaucracy is also promoted. While it may have its merits, chief among them being stability, it does mean that often someone less than competent will ascend to the top job.

This isn’t about his date of birth, and Gen Singh knows that. If the government thought he had been lying about it, he would have been court-martialled. For him to say that he is being accused of fudging it is a lie.

It certainly isn’t about his honour and integrity. He will retire as army chief and the perks that go with it. What more honour does a soldier expect from his nation?

If it really was about his personal honour, he should have stepped down and then gone to court instead of recklessly putting his institution through this trauma.

He can still do that.

Published in The Express Tribune, January 22nd, 2012.

Our Publications

COMMENTS (31)

George L V | 9 years ago | Reply It is clear that the writer is completely ignorant about the functioning and ways of the Armed Forces particularly Indian Army. The general populace of India, by and large has no clue about the organizational culture of the Indian Army. They already have vague and misleading notions about the 'Army way'. Be fair and honest: get a comprehensive and clear understanding of the Indian Army. Then and only then, even think of writing an article about the head of the Army. Otherwise it is a case of the blind leading the blind.
Cynical | 9 years ago | Reply

@Yuri Kondratyuk

Your rejoinder @Amjaad Cheema suffers from oversimplification. 'Facism' is not a political system, rather it's a belief system extolling traits such as totalitarian,absolutist,unitary etc.Anna Hazare has all of these in quite a good measure.His solutions to present day problems are archaic and utopian.

His apparent popularity owes a lot to the middle-class infatuation with all kinds of quick-fix and 24X7 TV camera.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ