Was it pilot error?


July 29, 2010

A doctor buries his mistake. A pilot is buried with his. Even though I sit 7,200 miles away from the scene of the crash, the shock was palpable. I have lived in Islamabad for 25 years. I love commercial aviation and have read countless books on the subject with a focus on flight safety. Despite many air accidents that we read about, flying is the safest form of travel. It is calculated that if you were born on an airplane and flew in it and never got off, you would not be involved in a fatal accident until you are 78 years old. Those are pretty good odds.

Yet when a crash does happen we feel a sense of fear and trepidation. What caused a sophisticated fly-by-wire Airbus A321 – with the most advanced avionics and systems that man has created to date – to fly into a hill? The commander, Captain Pervaiz Chaudhry, was an ex-PIA pilot with thousands of hours of flying time. He must have made hundreds of landings and take-offs from Islamabad airport. How can a highly experienced pilot trained on the most sophisticated six-axis motion simulators (which can be more challenging to fly than a real aircraft) pilot a high-tech aircraft into a wall and kill everyone?

Two aircraft ahead of the A321 broke off their approaches and diverted to Lahore. However, the weather can change rapidly and for the better. It is my sense, based on discussions on internet aviation forums, that the captain was making a circle-to-land approach. This is a tricky manoeuvre, used when the wind in Islamabad is out of the east. The procedure calls for a normal Instrument Landing System (ILS) approach to Runway 30. At a specified height and presuming that the pilot can see the runway he breaks off the approach, curves to the right and then turns left and flies parallel to the Margalla Hills, turns left again and approaches the opposite Runway 12 coming in over Murree Road. He can either keep visual separation from the Margalla Hills to his right or if the hills are shrouded in low clouds as they were that fateful day, he stays within an arc (which is drawn from a point at the airport). This arc is clearly displayed on the navigation display (ND) as a curved line. I do not recall the distance of the arc from the airport but obviously the arc is calculated to keep the plane clear of the surrounding high terrain.

Then something fateful happened. A lapse of concentration, distraction, spatial disorientation, loss of situational awareness, or the greatest killer of all: over-confidence and complacency. What is tragically obvious is that the captain drifted outside the curved arc and hit the hills. It is almost certain that as the aircraft approached the high terrain a computer generated voice in the Enhanced Ground Proximity Warning System (EGPWS) would have warned “Terrain! Terrain”! When the pilot hears that chilling warning the procedure is to immediately pitch up the nose of the aircraft to about 15 degrees while simultaneously applying GA (Go-Around) full power, wings level and head straight ahead. If you hesitate, turn, or think the warning is false, or are not aggressive enough with the manoeuvre you will most likely hit something. If I am wrong and he was making an approach to Runway 30 and hit the hills, he was way off course. Did air traffic control not see the aircraft on its radar getting dangerously close to high ground?

We will never know. Pakistan has no tradition of publishing air accident reports. Cairo, Taif, Kathmandu and most recently Multan remain cloaked in deep mystery. All the public hears is rumours, ill-informed speculation by the media, spin, denial, and obfuscation from authorities. This tragic accident will change nothing. As the saying goes, ‘if we do not learn from past mistakes we are doomed to
repeat them’.

Published in The Express Tribune, July 30th, 2010.

COMMENTS (44)

Malik Tariq Ali | 13 years ago | Reply This is a tragic accident, which could have been avoided, had both the pilots and ATC followed the procedures. Unfortunately accidents occur because human beings are involved and they tend to make mistakes. In a way the advanced technology has made the crew complacent, because these aircrafts have been built to perfection. Things go wrong when somebody does not follow a procedure, be it the ATC, or the pilot, or if the aircrafts are not being properly maintained. The machine can also go wrong. This is where the CAA comes in. In the case of ED 202, circumstancial evidence points to human error. The Black Box has been found. It was, where it was supposed to be, in the tail section. What a coincidence, it was found within an hour of arrival of Airbus engineers at the crash site. This reflects poorly on the competence level of the search team, the investigators, and even the CAA. Our aviation industry has suffered, not because of lack of new technology aircraft, but the tools that are needed to regulate this industry and the mindset that still insists on putting a veil over every accident, to cover up and not reveal. It is our sick archaic cultural hangups that are the impediment. Take any incident involving a Pakistani airline and the first reaction is denial or distortion of facts. Just view the contradictory reports on the recent incident involving a PIA aircraft (Pk302) which had engine failure on 30 July. The airline spokesman said that a bird hit during taxi caused the engine damage, while the fact is that the aircraft was on the take off roll. It is now reported that there were two engine failures. You cant blame the press, afterall 152 people have lost their lives.
Meekal Ahmed | 13 years ago | Reply Our high-decorated fighter pilot Sajjad "Nosey" Haider says the A321 went by him under full-power and in a climb. He must have got a terrain warning from the GPWS and was in go-around mode. Obviously too late. @Salman Zafar, I stand to be corrected. However, as I stated the weather can change very quickly. I am sure the so-called ATC recordings are a hoax. As I said it sounded very unprofessional. @Janjua, Experienced pilots make mistakes too. Capt. Choudhry may have had 25,000 hours but not many in-type -- meaning on the A321. Whether that is significant or not I can't say. Sometimes it is.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ