There were stone foundations of houses some clearly palatial, others humbler; several ruined temples; arched doorways and, the most intriguing of all, a rectangular stone platform with a free-standing arch. The remains of the lintels and pillars, only a few then in place, the rest in the dust, were all richly carved with motifs that we still see in the Chaukandi-style tombs of Sindh and Balochistan.
Pari Nagar was established as a port way back in the 6th century BCE (by another estimation, 400 years later), on an arm of the Rann of Cutch coming right up into the desert. On this inland sea did Pari Nagar become a thriving port whose ships sailed to distant marts. Its Jain merchants, assiduous and honourable in matters of commerce and trade, made good money and the city flourished.
In the winter of 1222, glorious Pari Nagar met the beginning of its end. The cowardly Jalaluddin, erstwhile king of Khwarazm, fleeing before a general of Changez Khan’s army, turned up outside the gates of this city. Defeated, humiliated and pursued like a hunted beast, Jalaluddin in his frustration had already vented his spleen on the cities of Multan, Uch and Bhakkar. Looting and sacking, he had left behind smouldering ruins of those once great cities. He did likewise at Pari Nagar.
But after Jalaluddin withdrew towards Bhambore (which, too, he sacked), Pari Nagar rebounded right back. Powered by the riches of its Jain merchant class, the port city soon bustled anew. Another century was to pass before life slowly began to ebb away from the lively streets and market squares of Pari Nagar. The inland sea receded until it had completely forsaken the port. No longer could ships sail up into the desert. The commerce of Pari Nagar died; its merchant class forsook it for other places. The walls of the city fell silent, wild growth overtook the ruins and the abandoned buildings of the once beautiful city crumbled. Only its name, Pari Nagar, and tales of its grandeur refused to leave the collective memory of the people of Thar.
That was how I found it in April 1984: in the bazaar of Virawah men had tales and tales without end to tell of the past glory of Pari Nagar. Later, I checked with the Department of Archaeology in Karachi, but no investigation had taken place on this fabulous site and there was little to learn of its life in those far off times.
In the summer of 2009, I returned to Virawah with the hope of photographing the ruins of Pari Nagar. Other than one ruinous Jain temple and some scattered pieces of masonry, I found nothing amid the thick undergrowth. The place had been picked clean of the ruins. The Rangers man accompanying me said, the locals had over the years taken away the stones and bricks to make their own houses. Later, in the Virawah bazaar I found this to be true.
In anger, I turned on the Ranger: if he and his colleagues had spotted a young woman and man holding hands and strolling among the ruins, they would have belaboured them for obscenity. And here, the greatest obscenity, the pillaging of the cultural heritage of this sorry land took place right under their eyes and nobody moved.
But the Rangers in the desert are not the only ones to blame. The people of Pakistan are spectacularly blind when it comes to heritage and history. We embrace a false, contrived history; we reject our true heritage. That is the way we have been trained for the past six decades.
Published in The Express Tribune, January 14th, 2012.
COMMENTS (25)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Ali Tanoli: " ... I might be from them but not Hindu this is for sure. .... "
Have you thought about what will happen to Islam once Saudi Arabia runs out of oil ?
@Raj X I might be from them but not Hindu this is for sure.
@Ali Tanoli: I have no doubt in my mind that you are a direct descendent of Mohamad bin quasim. Just confirm it and let me know. And you are a "syed" too. Maybe a "Parthian" also...
@Ali Tanoli
Who do you think were your ancestors? If I may ask. You have your right to remain silent.
@Ali Tanoli: Tanoli people are not native to the sub-continent are they ?
@Deb Never thought about it but i think i will do it my DNA test.
@zalim singh Yes Ranjit sing never butchered innocent people right and no body did it except muslims thats every saying these days what a shame, @sanjeev u can use my comment in that content too thanks.
I agree Alexander was also not a great really. Other than conquering land he realy don't have much legacy as a ruler.
@Ali Tanoli Salman sahab ancestors were hindus so dont surprised. For a start, it's a tasteless comment to make.But I accept that even the bigots should have their right to express their opinion for whatever worth it is.
As for your condescending referral to the author's hindu (assumed) ancestry, I would most humbly suggest that you should get in touch with people having a rudimentary knowledge of genetics,DNA analysis and anthropology.Trust me, it will be a revelation.
Almost 99% of today's Pakistanis are converts from Hindus (of various sects),Sikhs,Jains,Budhists,Zoroastrians,Jews,Christians etc. This part of the world was inhabitated by people long before the advent of Islam, and those people have their own language,custom,tradition and religion too. I am afraid you may not like the fact that, Jinnah,Iqbal and Bhutto (to name just a few), all had Hindu ancestors.
@Zalim singh: I am not a partisan of Jalaluddin, but the hands of Alexander the Great are not clean either. He is known to have killed many innocents including his newly-born half brother to gain power -- such are the ways of warriors of the past, and of the present.
@ Zalim Singh
Alexander also slaugtered civilians in western India..he was not that great as made to be shown..Any conqueror who goes from east to west is a barbarian but a conquror from west to east is automaticly a great king, if this is the logic you bring out like the westerners I pity you..
Mr Rashid ...wow... you're exatly writing what i want to explore about western India (Pakistan and Afghanistan) continue the great work..I hope one day I'll write a book about greater India...
Salman Sahib, Is there a map which could give a sense of the sea coast at Pari nagar.
@Ali Tanoli: It shows your communal and regressive mindset.
In Pakistan I have observed that what a scholar has written is attributed or explained by his or her own religious back ground or in this case the author's ansestors!!!! Sorry to use harsh words but this is rotten. I do not understand why everything is looked from the prism of religion in Pakistan.
@ Baluchi
butchering innocent people is a cowardly act. It is done by cowards to gain delf-esteem. Great leaders like Alexander never innocent slaughtered people like Jalaluddin or even Oasim.
Dear Salman Bhai. Great article.
You torment me sir. You give me a little taste but leave me hungry for more. Please keep on writing there is least one person here who is interested in fact based historiography.
Surely the villagers could have taken "useless debris" from the rubble, but I have seen huge slabs of beautifully carved limestone from Makli, in the living rooms of expatriots on the other side of the globe. Wooden doors which once served as enterances of some Swati house served as a mantle piece in Hampstead Heath, London.
Some of these people have worked for decades for Unicef, Unesco etc getting salaries more than that of the Pakistani president. At times of catastrophes they rush to Islamabad and advise the government about preservation of our national heritage. The "jahil" villagers do not know the worth of these bits and pieces but those who know it are always ready to serve the nation.
I wish some photographs had accompanied this article.
Then the trading community of Jains moved to new port via Gujrat, and again a new trading center propped up MUMBAI, and it gonna stay for few more centuries atleast.
Ali try to have some genetic testing on you and you will find your ancestor/genalogy as Buddhist or Hindus.
Baluchi - The author uses cowardly for Jalalludin in his reference against Changez Khan General. He could have fought and get Martyred rather running to other parts of India and having the Angst of his defeat on Pari Nagar.
Mr Salman Rashid, do the tales of a flourishing city, pari ( angel ) nagar , when inhabited by Hindu-Jain merchants , not speak of an age before the darkness of the land of Pakistan was removed by light from the deserts to the West ? So if that be the logic of the state , why preserve anything from the dark ages of the ancestors of Pakistan ? Or since most Pakistanis have now declared themselves to be of 'Arab descent' , may be there is no value in the rich archelogical riches of Pari Nagar to which the state has disowned itself ?
Please also write an article about the famous Multan (city of Gold) Hindu temple and how the local early Islamic settlers collected tax on the visiting Hindu pilgrims from present day India at the threat of destroying the idol.
By the description and writings of the Arab travelers the temple must have been a beautiful one and the riches of the Multan actually came from that temple.
What was interesting is that the local early Islamic settlers who controlled Multan never destroyed the idol for at least 100 years but used the temple and the threat of destruction of the idol as means to collect money from the pilgrims who visited the city annually.
Strange times and interesting piece of life at that time and of the history of Mutan.
@Baluchi Salman sahab ancestors were hindus so dont surprised.
Well, I think Salman sahib, you called me just before you went to Gorhi temple and Viraweh. These are great places but I would like to have more information about this and other Jain sites in Pakistan.
Salman Sahib, I am a big fan of your articles. But I am surprised at your referral to Jalaluddin as "cowardly". He may have been a lot of things but a coward he was not.