First question: what to do with the government left behind by the Soviets? What fate to mete out to the then president Mohammad Najibullah? The answer was obvious. Najibullah must go and be replaced by a dispensation consisting of the mujahideen factions and their khaki overlords in Pindi. The second major question was: how to deal with India, the neighbour perceived by them to be indelibly hostile to Pakistan. The superpower alliance had served as a protective umbrella of sorts. But with the alliance withering away, Pakistan would be left to its own devices against a far larger army to its east. The answer here was to take the machinery of covert war that the American’s had helped build to fight the Soviets and turn it towards India. Pin their army down in the mountains of Kashmir, and possibly expand the theatre to Indian Punjab as well.
Remember the brief flowering of the Khalistan movement in Indian Punjab? Remember the hoopla in Pakistan when it was said that Benazir had handed over to the Indians a list of all Pakistani assets in Indian Punjab said to be part of the Khalistan movement?
If you questioned military officials in those days regarding their perception of India as an indelibly hostile neighbour, they would talk to you about Brass Tacks and Siachen. And clearly, they found it inconvenient to redirect their machine for covert war towards India while having to look over their shoulder at the civilian government, a paranoia especially stoked by the Khalistan list incident. A very similar realignment is underway in Pakistan today, as another superpower army prepares to withdraw from a decade of war in Afghanistan. And a very similar set of questions arises in the wake of this withdrawal.
Question one: what to do with Hamid Karzai once the Americans are gone? Answer: he can join Najibullah, Kabul must be ruled by a dispensation chosen in Pindi. Today, if you ask any military official about India, they will talk to you about Cold Start. The need to be wary of the army in the East remains. The instruments of preparedness now include a beefed-up nuclear deterrent, the protection of which itself has become a new strategic objective.
The present moment has the benefit of offering an alternative to the Americans, something that was not available in the late 80s. Hence, the frequent trips to China, from the DG ISI to Imran Khan’s night flight to Beijing the day after the Lahore rally, to the COAS’s five-day sojourn there only recently. Which brings us to the big question: why now? Why try and bring the government to grief at this point, so close to the finish line, when all you have to do is wait a year? My best guess is that the timing has everything to do with the talks going on with the Taliban.
We know that Kabul and Pindi are both engaged in their own talks with the Taliban to negotiate an end to the hostilities. We also have reason to suspect that they are both trying to disrupt each other’s efforts. We know the talks are treacherous and delicate, as the events of Jamrud, Orakzai, Khyber etc., are making clear day by day. It must be monumentally inconvenient to undertake such a delicate task while having to constantly look over your shoulder at the civilian government, particularly its ambassador in DC. Enter Imran Khan, with his strong stance to end the hostilities through talks, along with Shah Mahmood Qureshi by his side, talking about Cold Start and protection of nuclear weapons.
The court entanglements of the present government bring to mind the no-confidence motion of 1989, an episode BB narrowly survived but which left her government mortally wounded. The rise of Imran Khan brings to mind the rise of Nawaz Sharif. Just like the hidden hand in those days was preparing the ground for the new reality that would emerge following the Soviet withdrawal, so today, it is girding itself for a post-American Afghanistan and it needs its own people in a civilian set-up to see its efforts through.
Published in The Express Tribune, January 12th, 2012.
COMMENTS (23)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Rumi Balkhi: "Go speak to a common Baloch and ask him if India is sending their agents to destabilize Balochistan and you will get a straight answer. The truth of the matter is that even if there were no Indian consulates in Afghanistan you would still have an insurgency in Balochistan."
UN officials in Kabul have told American analyst C Christine Fair that Afghanistan's intel agency is supplying weapons to Balochi insurgents on India's behalf. Even that rabidly anti-Pakistan asst. prof. will attest to Indian meddling in Balochistan so you are either adorably naive or simply lying. Any insurgency in Balochistan would be infinitely weaker without Indian consulates in Afghanistan and Iran.
@Junaid
You must live under a rock. Khalistan and Kashmir are pipe dreams and India is too powerful to let neither Punjab nor Kashmir ever secede from the union.
Afghanistan is a sovereign nation and they can allow Indian consulates to be opened in every city in Afghanistan because most middle class Afghans want to travel to India for trade and educational opportunities.
Go speak to a common Baloch and ask him if India is sending their agents to destabilize Balochistan and you will get a straight answer. The truth of the matter is that even if there were no Indian consulates in Afghanistan you would still have an insurgency in Balochistan.
By your looks you appear to be a wise person but.....you are also a victim of conspiracy-prone mindset. I would suggest broaden your horizon a bit more...a bit! One, you have already eluded to reasons to remain vigilant against India. Two, view recent happenings in a broader context and strike its relevance with emerging US grand design/ grand strategy for the remaining part of this century. I am not referring to any conspiracy here. With renewed focus to Asia-Pacific, the US needs to shape regional environment in this region to its favour. Essentially to contain China, there is a lot of shaping yet to go in. It is here that Pakistan emerges in the equation. Extremist viz a viz threat of nuclear proliferation, Pakistan's stratgeic partnership with China and its animosity with India are the top concerns for the US Policy makers (refer to latest US National Security Strategy,Quadrennial Defence Review and recent Strategic Defence Review). Apparently in US calculus, a US-leaning moderate, progressive and democratic Pakistan with devoid or compromised nuclear capability, is in the best US interest. Now, here, Pakistan Armed Forces somehow emerge as a stumbling block in US way. Hence, memo issue and Silala Incident to undermine Pakistan's Centre of Gravity (COG). Clausewitz and Dr Joe Strange say, if you are able to undermine adversary's COG, you will be able to achieve your end-state, which in this case is moderate, progressive.......as I have said earlier. Afghanistan is just one piece in the puzzle. This is just the synopsis of what I would want to say to you! If you wish to engage in this discussion with me, I may offer you my email contact. Regards
Nice article
The academic research and approach that Khurram employs makes him, in my view, the best critic of this nations beloved Imran Khan. Once Imran comes to power we would require people like Khurram to be the opinion makers.
Another brilliant column...thats three in a row...
If we go with the argument of the writer i would just hope this time the establishment has chosen a better candidate to lead the country.
@Junaid
Nice try, Zaid Hamid disciple.
hmmm author terming all of us who support IK as instruments of Establishment...pity
The fix is in. The Army intends to control civilians through their chosen man. They intend to control Afghanistan by sending our strategic exports back into IOK. But this time the Indians, afghans and the world are ready to call our bluff.
Brilliant analysis. The situation is indeed the same as at the end of the 1980s. So the khakis are getting ready to replay the same moves they made last time in the belief that it will yield the same results. But there are key differences this time, which will boomerang. (1) The US is not the Soviet Union - there'll be fewer but no less meaningful troops in Afghanistan after 2014. (2) Support to Afghan army in terms of money and arms will not dry up for at least the next 5 years. (3) Pakistan is economically far weaker this time. (4) Pakistan's vulnerabilities are far better exposed and understood by adversaries.
A major unknown is US elections in 2012. If Obama is voted out, a republican president will not be as eager to wind down operations in Afghanistan.
These and many other variables mean that while Pak plays the same opening this time, the game can still have a totally different outcome.
So, they've been right all along?
Good analysis.
Or maybe it's just as simple as a few Generals who have never been known for their ability to think strategically?
So another round of chase-your-own-tail is about to start for Pakistan? Extreme paranoia, misplaced bravado, misspent resources, burgeoning population, rampant illiteracy and ignorance, chronically ill economy.
Same game, different names. Those that don't learn from history are bound to repeat their mistakes.
The rest of the world bids adieu.
Brilliant article!
One this is though different between when Soviets left and 2014. Indian economy at that time was not even in top 25. 2014 it will be in top 8 or 9. Which means it has more wherewithal to protect itself in covert war.
Pak army is a mafia which takes in almost 25% of the Pakistani GDP as protection money but has never actually won a war. If you consider efficiency as a ratio of input to results then pak army must be one of the most inefficient organizations in the world.
Author might want to re-consider his position on attributing rise of Imran Khan only due to engagement of deep state's engagement in politics. There are multiple flaws in that argument from anti-incumbency sentiment at work to significant shift in national demographics to recent anti-establishment inductions in PTI (such as Javed Hashmi and Asghar Khan). Secondly, using historical data to establish direction of future events is also an unsound approach specially when the fundamentals are shifting. But then again, we are a nation where mullahs to intellectuals are all occupied in conspiracy theory formulation anyways.
well written article. Like fools we run from one master to other, only to be exploited and make only certain sections of society even richer by allocation more budgetary funds. From US, Saudi, to China. Its like a cycle that goes on and on. We have carefully created and maintain a concept of imaginary foes to get this cycle going.
Pakistan is like a broken broken record where the needle is stuck in the same groove. Deja Vu all over again!
Extraordinary analysis, sounds like there are still comentators capable of making sense of the sudden flurry of activity that must be taking place in Rawalpindi. All I can add is that however the Americans are not leaving completely, so the night crew in Pindi should plan accordingly.
Superb analysis.....khakis have been biggest beneficiaries of Pakistan, not the people.