Afghan endgame: US ready for Haqqani talks

Published: January 9, 2012
The US is now arguing
that the Haqqani
network has a ‘pivotal
role’ in any future
political dispensation
of Afghanistan.

The US is now arguing that the Haqqani network has a ‘pivotal role’ in any future political dispensation of Afghanistan.

ISLAMABAD: Despite having suffered serious setbacks in the aftermath of the November 26 Nato airstrikes which killed 24 Pakistani soldiers, Washington and Islamabad have continued ‘dialogue’ even amidst flaring tensions.

The US has taken Pakistan into confidence over the unprecedented development of allowing the Taliban a political office in Qatar to advance the Afghan reconciliation process, sources revealed.

A senior Pakistani official stated that the Obama administration not only sought Pakistan’s consent over the Taliban office but had also given a ‘green light’ to allow the deadliest Afghan insurgent group, the Haqqani network, to be a part of the reconciliation process.

The move by Washington was a clear deflection from its previous policy of keeping Islamabad at bay over its peace overtures with the Afghan Taliban.

“Yes, we were onboard,” said the senior Pakistani official referring to the latest push by Washington to seek a political settlement of the Afghan conflict.

The US has long resisted talks with the Haqqani network, believed to be based in the North Waziristan Agency.

Contrary to Washington’s prior stance, the country’s military establishment is now looking to avoid confronting the Haqqanis head on, arguing that the group has a ‘pivotal role’ in any future political dispensation of Afghanistan.

“They [Americans] are now following the same approach that we have been advocating for years,” said a security official, requesting not to be named. The official added that Chief of Army Staff General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani himself conveyed to US President Barack Obama in late 2010 that a solution to the decade-old conflict in Afghanistan could only come through the meaningful talks with the Taliban.

The Pakistan military had even urged the US to announce a ceasefire in Afghanistan creating “favourable conditions for talks with the insurgents”, it was disclosed. But Washington, instead of following that policy, initiated talks with the Taliban on its own, said the official.

“The CIA had attempted to woo certain Taliban individuals but their efforts failed because those people had nothing to do with the Taliban,” commented defence analyst Brig (retd) Mehmood Shah.

Shah – the former security secretary of the Federal Administered Tribal Areas (Fata) – said the opening of the Taliban office was certainly a “positive development”.

An American diplomat also confirmed that the two countries have been engaging in dialogue on the Afghan endgame despite the recent hiccup in the relationship in the wake of the Nato attacks.

“We have already acknowledged that Pakistan has a critical role in the Afghan reconciliation process,” said the diplomat, who requested to remain anonymous.

Meanwhile, a Pakistani security official accepted the fact that despite Islamabad’s strong reaction to the Salala attack, the US did not escalate the situation further.

“The US approach has allowed us to keep the channel of communication open with them,” said the official.

The Express Tribune further learnt that Pakistan has asked the US not to send any senior officials to the country for the time being, bearing in mind the growing US resentment over the hugely unpopular Nato airstrikes.

Another western diplomat pointed out that Pakistan could have taken far worse steps than what was actually done after the Nato attack.

“The blocking of Nato supplies is of course a big decision, but it certainly isn’t a drastic step,” the diplomat told The Express Tribune.

“Had Pakistan denied its airspace to the Nato forces, that would have been a disaster,” he remarked.

(Pakistan-US relations: year end review)

Published in The Express Tribune, January 9th, 2012.

Facebook Conversations

Reader Comments (8)

  • Gabriel
    Jan 9, 2012 - 6:42AM

    Good news after a long pause, I feel happy every time I see news about steps taken towards peace in Afghanistan, all parties may it be US, Pakistan or Afghanistan need an end to this meaningless but deadly war. It has spilled over into Pakistan and has bled Pakistan badly as well. Anything towards achieving peace at our neighbours is welcome, bravo Pakistan and US for doing all this. My well wishes for you guys.


  • Chaha Sam pagal huwa badnaam
    Jan 9, 2012 - 7:50AM

    Afghan endgame: US ready for Haqqani talks

    is this a joke?


  • Mard-e-Haq
    Jan 9, 2012 - 9:43AM

    Whatever happened to “we do not negotiate with terrorists?”Recommend

  • Abhi
    Jan 9, 2012 - 7:02PM

    The US strategists know that a weak dysfunctional Pakistan that can’t be used as a counter balance to India is not in their interest. There have been increasing remarks regarding Pakistan and how the US should stop making it more weak by its action because (a) mainly because of the nukes and (b) less frequently to maintain the “balance of power” on the sub-continent.

    What we should be learning is how the US does not put ideological blinkers on and is willing to take unorthodox and out of the box positions to achieve its vision and long term goal.

    Can India do the same?


  • Shah baba
    Jan 9, 2012 - 10:58PM

    This report appears to be conveying a certain message without disclosing any significant details of who said what although some statements are even linked to Gen Kayani. The only notable mention is Brig(Retd) Mehmood Shah. Else there are references to:

    A senior Pakistani Official
    A security official
    An American diplomat
    A Pakistani security official
    Another Western Diplomat
    The Message that Pakistan is on board
    There has been an unusual silence from Foriegn Office on the development of Taliban office in the Qatar.
    The Quetta Shura is believed to be based in Pakistan as is the Haqqani network and if that’s true, Islamabad seems a more logical place for them to have an office.

    In response to the statement that the U.S didn’t escalate the tensions further, I think the freeze on aid to Pakistan was one of the first bills approved this year by Obama
    administration. I won’t consider that a gesture to ease tensions.


  • Climp Jones
    Jan 10, 2012 - 12:56AM

    This reminds of the time Nixon & Kissinger sold out the South Viet Namese & the Soviet Union sold out the head of Afghanistan when they departed. A cease fire is the equivalent of self strangulation.


  • Devin Leonard
    Jan 11, 2012 - 12:45AM

    We have been hammering the Haqqanni network for the past year with drones and Spec Ops forces, and they are running scared. To ease up on them now is a mistake. We need to keep killing and capturing senioe Haqqanni leaders and operatives untill they have no choice but to negotiate from a level of weakness…period!


  • gabriel khan
    Jan 15, 2012 - 10:43AM

    @Devin Leonard:
    pak army has been relocating Haqqanis within the tribal areas as americans provide shelters, weapons and training to TTP who are US proxy, Haqqanis will never be pushed till the time US continue helping TTP. When US and pak both decide to stop proxy war and start negotiating peace deals onnly then peace will come to the region. Hope it happens sooner then later.


More in Pakistan