Pakistan rejects US probe on lethal strikes

Military says the it does not agree with the findings of the US inquiry as being reported by the media.

Afp December 23, 2011

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan on Friday rejected a US probe into American air strikes that killed 24 Pakistani soldiers, providing little sign of a swift resolution to the worst crisis in the countries' fragile alliance.

"Pakistan's army does not agree with the findings of the US/Nato inquiry as being reported in the media. The inquiry report is short on facts," the military said in a short statement.

"A detailed response will be given as and when the formal report is received," it said.

The inquiry, headed by a US Air Force general, blamed US and Pakistani forces for a series of mistakes that led to "tragic" air strikes on November 26, the deadliest single cross-border attack of the 10-year war in Afghanistan.

The Americans acknowledged for the first time significant responsibility for the strikes, but insisted their troops responded only after coming under heavy machine-gun and mortar fire, angering Islamabad, which has denied any such thing.

The probe portrayed a disastrous spate of errors and botched communication in which both sides failed to tell the other about their operational plans or location of troops, exposing deep distrust.

Pakistan refused to take part in the inquiry, having criticised previous investigations into cross-border attacks as worthless. Instead, it has sought a formal apology from US President Barack Obama.

Islamabad has kept its Afghan border closed to Nato convoys since November 26, boycotted the Bonn conference on Afghanistan and ordered Americans to leave an air base understood to have been a hub for CIA drone strikes on the Taliban.

The 28-day border closure is unprecedented in the 10-year US-led war in Afghanistan, shutting down the quickest and cheapest supply line for 140,000 foreign troops fighting the Taliban.

Analysts in Pakistan saw little in the report that would repair relations, particularly with the government and military in a standoff over alleged attempts by one of the president's aides to rein in the power of the military.

"Our military and government have promoted anti-Americanism on this issue, thereby restricting their own options to re-open negotiations with the US," Lahore-based security analyst Hasan Askari told AFP.

"We are not sure how long they will continue with this stalemate. Given the present crises in Pakistan, neither the civil government nor the military will make a positive move towards the US," he added.

Brigadier General Stephen Clark, who led the probe, said US aircraft carried out three strikes after American and Afghan commandos raiding a village near the border came under heavy machine-gun and mortar fire.

The US did not tell the Pakistanis in advance about the night raid and the Pakistanis had never notified Nato of new border posts in the area, he said.

"For the loss of life -- and for the lack of proper coordination between US and Pakistani forces that contributed to those losses -- we express our deepest regret," the US statement said, stopping short of an apology.

The report upheld much of Pakistan's version of events, namely that the Americans called in the wrong coordinates when asking for clearance to attack, but contradicted Pakistan by insisting its troops came under fire first.

The Pentagon acknowledged the Americans relayed "incorrect mapping information" to the Pakistanis, giving the wrong location for Pakistani troops at border outposts, and found "inadequate coordination" between both sides.

Nato agreed with the findings and said "a series of mistakes were made on both sides in failing to properly coordinate their locations and actions both before the operation and during the resulting engagement".

The episode reflected "an over-arching lack of trust," Clark said.

Nato officers view Pakistan as reluctant to disclose all their border posts and the military in Afghanistan has the impression that when they have shared details, some operations have been compromised, he said.

The air strikes were the latest in a series of crises this year that have brought the fragile Pakistani-US alliance to an all-time low.

In January, a CIA contractor shot dead two Pakistanis and was taken into custody, accused of double murder. On May 2, a covert American raid killed Osama bin Laden near the capital without Washington informing the government.


D.Tsang | 9 years ago | Reply

It,is very simple indeed, if the report is unacceptable, Pakistanis should stand united and firm to reject the finding and insist to for a formal apology, period. Falling short from the demand, it means no more cross boarder crossing re-opening for the responsible parties and vigorously defend Pakistan's sovereignty by all means. This pretty much is true as a rational response for any other countries on this globe.

Tony C. | 9 years ago | Reply

@Harry Stone: Dear Harry, I do not think that you quite have it in regard to the dreadful harm America has perpetrated around the world over the last ten years or so. The current death toll from U.S./NATO interventions is well over two million people; after ten years the Iraqi infrastructure (which had a high standard-of-living) is still almost inoperable; Libya, which had the highest standard-of-living in North Africa (hardly stone-age) is now a pile of rubble. Due to American intervention in Afghanistan the Afghan people have a lower standard-of-living than before. On top of this the U.S. military routinely attack villages, in Afghanistan/Pakistan and kill men, women and children by throwing grenades into their houses or call in air strikes if the people resist, using the excuse that they were militants. Another point to consider is that the U.S. has spent 5 trillion dollars fighting the Iraq, Afghanistan wars. This is really generous, particularly when you consider they are spending your tax money. The other thing to consider is that most of the U.S. generosity goes into military aid, and most of it goes to one country. I will not go back 49 years, but there are many children still being born with deformaties from U.S. military interventions over this period, and America, with its generosity has done very little to help out. No Harry, I do not consider America to be a generous nation. In fact, just the reverse. American leaders are mean minded and brutal, and what is really scary is that many Americans cannot see it. All I can be grateful for is that America has not tried to save my country with one of its noble missions. The consequences of an American mission in my country would be too nightmarish to contemplate. .

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read