NATO attack: US offers regret, compensation but no apology

State Department spokesperson says US accepts responsibility and is prepared to offer payment to soldiers' families.


Huma Imtiaz December 23, 2011

WASHINGTON: Hours after the Department of Defence and Nato issued press releases on the findings into the Nato airstrike on November 26 on the Pak-Afghan border, State Department spokesperson Mark Toner was repeatedly pressed by journalists at the daily press briefing about why only a statement expressing regret had been issued as opposed to an apology.

Toner said: "The difference is that we have accepted responsibility for mistakes that we made. But as the report makes clear, there were miscommunications on both sides. There was misinformation that led to the results of that day. It’s a great tragedy. We’ve expressed our regret."

Toner was also asked about the difference between "we're sorry" and "we regret" by a journalist at the briefing.

The State Department spokesperson said: "I think ‘we regret’ refers to a sense of sympathy with the Pakistani people in this case, but more broadly with the people affected by any incident or tragedy.”

“We’re accepting responsibility for any of our actions that may have contributed to it. I don’t know about an apology – you can figure that out for your own. I can only say what we’re trying to express through this investigation."

Earlier this month, a New York Times report said that US President Barack Obama will not issue a formal apology or condolences on the death of 24 Pakistani soldiers in a Nato attack on the Pak-Afghan border.

The report had stated that US Ambassador to Pakistan Cameron Munter, through a video conference, told White House officials that the anti-American sentiment has reached its peak in Pakistan stressing the need for a formal apology by the US. But the White House argued that condolences offered by senior US officials and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton were enough till the US completes its investigations into the matter, the report said.

“The US government has offered its deepest condolences for the loss of life, from the White House and from Secretary Clinton and Secretary Panetta,” said Tommy Vietor, spokesman for the National Security Council, referring to Defense Secretary Leon E Panetta, “and we are conducting an investigation into the incident. We cannot offer additional comment on the circumstances of the incident until we have the results.”

On the question of compensation, Toner on Friday said that while the Department of Defense would have more information, "my understanding is that we are prepared to offer some payments in recognition of the loss incurred by the family."

Toner also added that while the State Department had expressed regret, the US had also accepted responsibility for the mistakes that were theirs.

COMMENTS (23)

Harry Stone | 10 years ago | Reply

@Waqas:

Are you referrring to the 24 military members that lost their lives. I missed the reports that PAK had deployed forces north of the boarder to fight terrorists. In fact, I believe most the military losses sustained by PAK have been within PAK.

Now if you are saying that PAK are fighting terrorists that they normally would have good relations with. well that is a different story all together.

But your question is interesting. If you believe the people and leaders of PAK have realized this about America, when do you think the Americans will come to the same conclusion about PAK?

Waqas | 10 years ago | Reply

@ Harry. I think by now Pakistanis have realized that America is their enemy, not an ally after paying heavy price of so called " cooperation on war on terror"

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ

E-Publications

Most Read