“The Baloch youth don’t want a Pakistan in which they receive mutilated bodies of their compatriots … they are being systematically eliminated and forced to seek refuge in the mountains,” said the former chief minister of Balochistan and the founding chief of the Balochistan National Party.
Mengal also accused Interior Minister Rehman Malik of hurling threats at the Baloch in the same way former president General Musharraf did. While many in Pakistan might dismiss part of Mengal’s loaded criticism of the centre and the army, the multiple crises in Balochistan do merit serious and urgent consideration.
There is little doubt that Balochistan is most probably as much a microcosm of Pakistan’s security and political crisis as is Fata. Almost 450 murders since January so far; dozens of abductions and hundreds of attacks on key security and utility installations suggest that the province is currently going through one of the worst political, economic and security crises in its history.
The growing influence of religious extremists in the province is noticeable from the fact that the highest number of attacks on Nato supplies were carried out in Balochistan during the last four years, apparently by Taliban or pro-Taliban elements. The unusual number of target killings of Hazaras also bears testimony to the increased involvement in sectarian terrorism of outfits such as the Lashkar-e-Jhangvi. Most Pakistani security agencies, officials and people at large, usually suspect external forces such as Afghanistan, the US and India of stoking and supporting nationalist violence to allegedly force Pakistan to accept their demands, which include serious tackling of organisations such as the so-called Quetta Shura and the Haqqani network, and the Lashkar-e-Jhangvi.
Based on the trends the Centre for Research and Security Studies observed since January this year, one could probably narrow down the current wave of violence in Balochistan to four key categories i.e. Baloch separatists, sectarian, external and internal forces (security agencies). All of them are so intricately intertwined that no easy deduction is possible to pinpoint the culprits behind most violent incidences.
Sectarian violence, the data suggests, claimed the second highest number of deaths after those caused by the nationalist militancy during the period starting from 2003 to December 2011. Shia were the primary victims of sectarian attacks and a majority of these attacks occurred in Quetta (237) and Jhal Magsi (36). Hindus were also affected by this violence, which forced them to migrate to other parts of the province or the country. Suicide attacks were the major cause of death (150) followed by non-suicide fatal attacks (114) and bombings (10). Officially banned organisations, mainly the Taliban and the Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, were the ones that often claimed responsibility for such attacks and the minority Hazara community living in the region was the major victim of this violence.
Dr Malik Baloch, a balanced nationalist leader, also draws attention to the alarming circumstances that currently prevail in Balochistan. He, too, dismisses the Balochistan package, scorns the predominance of the security forces in governance and security matters and considers them to be a major source of discontent among the Baloch people in particular. Despite all these misgivings, Dr Baloch still pretends to be optimistic. Speaking at a seminar in Islamabad recently, he said that the dominant majority of the Baloch people are probably still pro-federation if their bruised egos are assuaged. The present provincial parliament, he said, had lost its relevance and only a fresh mandate could probably help restore the trust of the Baloch in the political system, which is leaking and creaking under misgovernance, violence and apathy of rulers.
Published in The Express Tribune, December 22nd, 2011.
COMMENTS (22)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@gaznavi
Your geographical knowledge is very poor, you left most of the states out of this refrendum. What will happen to Odisa, Andhra, Karnataka, Goa, Bihar, Rajastha, Gujrat?
@cynical Very good observation. Actually every thing can be represented by two nation theory. You know very basis of computer exist on this theory (some people call it binary system)
@Cynical: You got it all wrong. two nation theory was that muslims and hindus are separate nations and cannot co-exist together not that lines on bases of ethnic background
In Islam, Ummah consists of all the muslims irrespective of their race,colour,ethnicity
The author ridiculously manages to divert the attention from the killing of Baloch by security agencies to sectarian and other issues. In the paragraph "Sectarian violence, the data suggests, claimed the second highest number of deaths after those caused by the nationalist militancy during the period starting from 2003 to December 2011...." he fails to mention the number of mutilated bodies of Baloch political activists that might be much higher on the list he presents.
Job not so well done Mr Gul...
Yes please have a referendum in Balochistan - I want to see how much of democratic country Pakistan is.
@Ghaznavi
Very well said, Sir. Hats off to your powers of divination!
Could you please also reveal what, in your wisdom, you see as the result of a referendum in Baluchistan?
Even though TTP is responsible for murdering close to 40,0000 Pakistani civilians and armed forces personnel, yet we have no qualms in demanding negotiations and a peaceful settlement. Then why the double standards when it comes to Baluchistan? Baloch have not attacked GHQ, Mehran Naval Base, targeted military, PAF, Navy officers, destroyed schools! All they have done is shown the temerity to ask for their rights, it's about time we treated them with respect, but is it possible with an establishment driven by internal security concerns? I doubt it very much, things are going from bad to worse where establishment is playing the waiting fame hoping this movement will run out of steam and eventually fizzle out. We, the people of Pakistan are selective in our outrage, nothing was said when our proud establishment killed hunted of thousand Bengalis and the same is being repeated in Baluchistan and the people of Pakistan remain silent. If tomorrow Baluchistan decides to separate then we should not complain because we did not share their pain.
Why cant a referendum be held in Balochistan and let things to be decided based on that?
After all Pakistan is a big fan of referendums in India!
@Abbas from the US: Just read the article you have cited. Eye opener I must say. I have seen similar references by other international policy experts as well. This is a matter of grave concern and I can only hope our leadership (civilian and military) starts paying some attention to the grievances of Baluchi people.
Hearfelt condolences, sadness from India regarding our Balochi brothers. Population numbers is the big problem faced by the Oppressed Baluchistan Nation. If they were a bigger population like Bengali Muslims, they would have been liberated by now.
Balochistan was never a part of Pakistan,Afghanistan or Iran it was a free soverign country annexxed by Pakistan in 1947.It's freedom will bring a new chapter in South East Asia and peace will prevail and Afghanistan will develop along with Balochistan
Let's be honest to ourselves. A Baloch has the same right to choose his national identity as does a Palestinian, a Kashmiri, a Chechen, a Tibetian and if push comes to shove, my neighbourhood milkman as well. Bangladesh has often been cited as a failure of Qaid's two nation theory. Actually it has proved him right. It has validated the theory when Bangladeshis told us in no uncertain terms that Bengalis and Punjabis are two distinctly different nations and they can't live together. If Balochs ever choose to go their seperate way, it will be another validation of the two nation theory, not it's negation.
If, indeed, as per Sardar Ataullah Khan Mengal, the situation has been pushed to a point of no return, I fail to understand how can this information be timely. The statement in itself, as well as the thrust of Imtiaz Gul's article - read together - indicate an extremely grim set of circumstances identical to the situation that prevailed in former East Pakistan in the earlier part of 1971. Will the military, already beseiged with unmanageable challenges, launch a brutal operation against the indigenous people of Baluchistan who continue to seek their rights?
I am a PAKISTANI and I love Pakistan ( Kashmir,Sindh, Baluchistan, Punjab, KP and GBaltitstan). Our Balouchi ( PAKISTANI) brothers sisters should have all the rights same as any other Paksitani might have. ............BUT..... The other side of the picture is THERE ARE SOME FEW Blaochi YOUTHS who have been brainwashed and are shown the dream of a separate Baluchistan like a HONGKONG state and they are playing in the hands of the ENEMIES OF PAKISTAN ( they are in minority ,very very few but its a fact ). SO no matter how painful and dirty it may sound but WE HAVE TO GET RID OF THEM unless they leave PAKISTAN and go and live in another country which "they like".............................. Pakistan is for PAKISTANIs( Kashmiri,Sindhi, Balochi, Punjabi, KP and GBaltitstani people)............ If any "agency" is getting rid of such "cancer elements" I AM ALL FOR IT. If anybody does not LIKE PAKISTAN they are more than welcome to go and live where they love to live. I don't mind to find a dead body of a person who bombs Govt.installations and kill innocent people by home made bombs and who is working against the interest of PAKISTAN ( in my opinion he is a terrorist and needs to be dealt with the way he deserves to be ).
Next elections in Baluchistan will bring the same provincial parliament as the Sardars win election every time. Solution to Baloch crisis is to treat them like Pakistanis.