Prosecutors seek 11 year sentence for Jyllands-Posten bomb plotter

Davud, a member of Chinese Uighur was arrested with two accomplices in 2010 with explosive material.


Afp December 19, 2011

OSLO: Norwegian prosecutors Monday recommended prison sentences of up to 11 years for three men suspected of plotting an attack against a Danish newspaper that printed controversial Prophet Mohammed cartoons.

The stiffest sentence was sought for Mikael Davud, a member of the Chinese Uighur minority, who has been portrayed as the mastermind of the plot against the Jyllands-Posten newspaper.

"Davud imported world terrorism to Norway," prosecutor Geir Evanger said.

Prosecutors requested five-year terms for Davud's alleged co-conspirators, Shawan Sadek Saeed Bujak, an Iraqi Kurd residing in Norway; and David Jakobsen, an Uzbek also living in Norway.

Charged with plotting to commit a terrorist act and possession of explosive materials, the three men have pleaded not guilty.

Prosecutors say the trio, arrested in July 2010, initially targeted Jyllands-Posten after its 2005 caricatures of the Prophet Mohammed provoked fury and sometimes deadly protests across the Muslim world.

Their target then allegedly shifted to Kurt Westergaard, the caricaturist who caused the most upset with his drawing of Mohammed showing the prophet with a lit fuse in his turban.

Davud has acknowledged planning an attack, but said he was targeting Chinese interests in Norway, and not the newspaper.

He claimed to have acted for personal reasons and manipulated his co-defendants into obtaining chemical products, including hydrogen peroxide, to make a bomb.

According to Norway's intelligence agency PST, 40-year-old Davud had ties to al Qaeda, which trained him in explosives handling at a camp in Pakistan between November 2008 and July 2010.

The trial is scheduled to continue until late December and a verdict is expected early next year.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ