With the passage of time, I have concluded that he knew what he was talking about; the US administration (I read that as Pentagon/CIA, not White House/Capitol Hill) is indeed bent upon destroying the image of the Pakistan Army, its chief and the ISI.
The events of May 2 did more damage to the image of the armed forces than anything preceding it. All of General Parvez Kayani’s efforts of the preceding three years, to rebuild the image of the army, were wiped clean.
And yet, the DG ISI and him seemed to have staged some sort of a recovery by accepting the accusation of ‘incompetence’ rather than ‘complicity’, by presenting themselves before the parliament to accept responsibility.
Then came the dastardly attack on the two posts in Mohmand Agency on November 26. Lots of analysts have commented on this attack, some have been kinder to the US than others. I would like to point out three facts that may not have been adverted to: a) these twin posts were 2.5 kilometres inside the Durand Line on Pakistani territory; b) while these were under construction a couple of months earlier, Isaf/Nato helicopters flew over these to check whether they were being constructed at the location and in accordance with the specifications provided to them and, finally; c) between the two posts, the total number of soldiers present was 40, including two officers. Of these 40, 26 are dead and 14 are wounded; not a single individual survived unscathed!
The survivors in CMH Peshawar narrated that initially one helicopter approached, fired two flares, saw the posts and flew away. Shortly, thereafter, more helicopters appeared and fired flares again, before opening fire. Aircraft also followed suit. Major Mujahid, after trying to get through to his commanding officer, instructed the gunner of the lone 12.7 machine gun to retaliate but the gunner was shot by a gunship. Mujahid replaced the gunner himself and was hit by a rocket launcher, which killed him and destroyed the machine gun. After this gunships and aircraft just picked them off at will. The attack lasted just under an hour.
With apologies to those who still want to give the US the benefit of doubt; this massacre was a ‘turkey shoot’ and very deliberate!
Only one explanation comes to mind for this planned attack to be launched: it was again intended to embarrass the military command and it succeeded! Not just officers and men of the armed forces are demoralised; the entire nation wants to know why the military high command failed to respond to protect its men.
Once again, for a variety of reasons, the attempt did not succeed to the extent that the US administration probably expected it would. One view in circulation is that the attack was intended to draw attention away from memogate. Another view supports mine, which is that the Pakistan Army is the victim of a well-planned, well-orchestrated psychological warfare operation, launched by the US administration. I hope that those at the helm of affairs can take suitable measures to ward off the next event.
Published in The Express Tribune, December 19th, 2011.
COMMENTS (39)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Brig. Sb. come to terms with reality.
@Arindom: In spy business no agency is a holy cow. If you believe this it does not matter.
From abroad one can see lot of nervousness both within the GOP and in Public.
Pakistan feels garrisoned but is not willing to adjust to the changing realities in the region.
Punjab which has dominated is now surrounded by coalition of three smaller provinces.
They should take it in good grace. After all this is better than Federation's previous policies towards smaller provinces.
Pakistan brought America into this region.Now Pakistan is the least favorite nation.
Pakistan has to adjust to the new situation. In difficult situations blaming old friends is common but does't help.
Only one explanation comes to mind for this planned attack to be launched: it was again intended to embarrass the military command and it succeeded!
That seems simplistic. How about US troops were tracking militants and Pak troops gave covering fire to aid the militants (not that outlandish seeing the "strategic" complicity of Pak troops with good taliban?). So the local US Army got antagonized and gave Pak troops their piece of mind in not so subtle message.
Good chance that what I have said may not have happened. Good chance that any of the 10 other reasons mentioned in other articles happened. But I intend to question you "only one explanation" statement. No Sir, explanations are many - but a biased explanation given by you can be used to provide (un)substance to your agreement.
@sana
I haven't anything wrong here, and my views aren't "nasty".
Accept the reality, or else this country will be completely ruined.
@Sher Khan:
What exactly are you referring to? 2 May, Mehran, Kargil, '71? What about DHA, and other big businesses? Who allowed and authorised them that? How about no accountability to the people of the country for the hundreds of billions that is taken off of them in the name of defence and no one knows what happens to all that money?
max: hmm... protecting... like in 1971? Like by helping createTaliban that's made life hell for so many Afghans and now eating into Pakistan today? Like by usurping power so many times ultra vires to the constitution of Pakistan?
Any particular action you had in mind, in which it actually 'protected' even half of Jinnah's Pakistan? oh perhaps like 1999 and May 2nd etc?
@harkol: Yes Pakistan army is doing a great service by protecting it. What is your problem?
Author:
Assuming your views are correct, what can Pakistan Army do about it? Fight a war with USA? USA can destroy Pakistan army, without even being in the region. Pakistan has survived so far as a militaristic nation with the help of USA. Without US backing it with money and arms, the army will turn even more cruel on its own people and sooner or later people will need to stage a 'arab spring' like action to put army in its place.
And how can that be any bad?? You really think Pakistan army is doing Pakistan any great favor?
@Pakistani Kaki, i am sick of people like. leave pakistan and go to any country which will accept a person like you. army jawans and officers protect people like you with blood and sweat and you call it a problem. go look at tax evaders and elites of your country who has brought pakistan to its knees. close to 40 billion $ has been lost to corruption because of corrupt politicians. I am disgusted with your comments.
@Mirza: "Surrendering more than half the country was not?" This is a dangerous - and erroneous - characterization of those events. No one (from the outside) had attacked that half of the country and it was NOT surrendered. It was alienated by the Army which was kicked out by those alienated with a little help from the outside.
Any body who resist against American state sponsored terrorism is part of the problem. American only want to give dictation they do not believe in right and wrong.
@Irfan:
Cut the Brigadier some slack. Its difficult to know all this from a golf course or DHA. You can only do one or other other.
Shaukat,
QED: Crazy conspiracy theories, lame excuses and holier-than-thou patriotism masquerading as strategic analysis to cover-up every failure, rather than honesty, discipline and truth -- that's the biggest embarrassment for the Army.
Army is not part of the problem. It is indeed overt propaganda offensive in consort with physical actions by US and the likes to undermine sarifices of thousands.
@Talha: As you wrote your family members have served in Army and still you hold such nasty, albiet, incorrect views. I agree, bad off-springs can be in any organization.
Brigadier Sahib
"Mujahid replaced the gunner himself and was hit by a rocket launcher"
I thought rocket launchers are used to launch rockets!!
I FAIL TO UNDERSTAND:
In the 3rd paragraph, the Author mentions "The events of May 2 did more damage .................." Osama Bin Ladin's elimination is mostly referred as "May 2 event" or "May 2 incident". The entire Pakistani Media (print as well as electronic) leading Politicians, TV anchors, and news reporters mention it as such only. Why is everyone afraid to name the event directly as elimination / killing of Osama Bin Ladin. Is it out of fear or out of respect for the dead person? Even Benazir Bhutto's murder is referred directly as such and not in an indirect way. Are the Media, News Papers. Politicians and Reporters so much afraid of the dead man in the deep sea. The only exception I saw was Nadeem F. Paracha's write up in Dawn Newspaper under "Smokers' Corner".
There are so many other examples where similar indirect descriptions used. Such as, Establishment, Ruling Class, Rulers, etc. When you do not have the courage even to name it properly, how can you deal with it correctly?
Anybody that states the obvious is now going to be branded enemy of the state. Our Army is a state to itself. It answers to noone and everyone answers to it. The Army is involved in coups, terror, genocide and graft. Not only that - it has taken us to wars which we lost. It has rented us to foreign powers. It appropriates the best real estate, perks and businesses for itself. But - we must now beat our chests to protect our oppressors or else be beaten by them. We now live in a military - Islamic garrison country. They know the "truth" - we don't.
Shaukat, You write that: 1. the May 2 attack was intended to destroying the image of the Pakistan Army, its chief and the ISI 2. the Nov 26 Salala attack was intended to embarrass the military.
You allege that these attacks embarrassed the army because it could not respond to either of these. So if the US goal was to embarrass, it must have known for certain that the army could not respond to either attack in the 2+ hours that they took. In the May 2 case, the US helicopters also flew all the way to Abbottabad without being detected.
If the goal was embarrassment as you claim, then that could only work if it was known beforehand that the army wouldn't respond to these attacks. The only guaranteed way this could be known beforehand is: if you are also accusing the army of being incapable of responding to these attacks. It seems to me that you are embarrassing the army even more than the US did.
Pakistan's Army inherited the Brits' ideological control system - press and religious - and has used it faithfully since independence. The U.S. military has no organization to match this. How can the U.S. carry out psychological warfare without the tools for doing so?
If Anatol Lieven thinks that is what Pentagon planners have in mind we sure are in trouble. He is by far the most cogent analyst in America on South Asian affairs. He also has frequently warned that the war in the Tribal areas and Afghanistan seriously risk fracturing the Pakistani state. The army I hate to admit this: is the only force that is keeping things from spiralling out of control. ( and of course are primarily responsible of causing this mess)
We are now similar situation to Laos and Cambodia were in the Vietnam war. The only thing keeping the Americans away from a direct confrontation is our nuclear arsenal, thanks God for it. Pakistan military should clean out its ranks from the many CIA assets that have been carefully planted in the preceding ten years of the Musharaf Dictatorship. To start the ISI T wing needs to be dismantled. FC units trained by the Americans need to be disbanded. Same for SOFA SSG units trained at Ghazi base by the Americans.
A article in the daily beast mentioned that around $10 billion dollars have been spent developing a "shadow government" in Pakistan. This almost definitely includes Top Civil-Military and Beareacrats and journalists, these assets need to be monitored and liquidated. The process should occur through the Higher courts with evidence provided.
Most of the coming confrontation I believe will have to do with this counter intelligence war, hints of it do seem to appear vis a vis the Memogate scandal, and prominent changes in the foreign ministry. I am sure the rabbit hole goes much further. The current crop of NRO sycophants should be allowed to run their term and free and fair election should take place as soon as possible. Putting all the leadership responsibility on a largely discredited military leadership is not wise.
Pakistani army posts in the border have been known to give covering fire to infiltrating terrorists - this had been the pattern on both the Indian and Afghan borders. This is no longer "CIA/RAW/Mossad/Crusader/Jew" propaganda - the world KNOWS it as a fact today. Would the good Brigadier throw some light on this?
Spot on. But the Americans need to remember that this is the very army of mujahids that destroyed the Soviet Army and history always repeats itself.
If military defeats in all 4 wars against India and 7500 terrorist attacks couldn’t dent the image of the army, then nothing else can succeed. Severe lack of objectivity is one of our national traits.
So when the PA willingly become a mercenary force for the Americans during the 80's and later, it did not know the consequences of its actions.
Let's be honest here, the army has repeatedly damaged this country from 1971 to now.
I see it as being part of the problem too and my family members have served in it.
Pakistani officers now suffer a severe inferiority complex with regards to the US.
Ofcourse I mean there could be no other explanation now could there? Your disdain for the wider population is obvious, for the Army is a representation of the state and that any attack on it is an attack on hte people of Pakistan. But no, the Army is the victim. I mean an Army facing agression....now who would have thought..wait!
I agree with your conclusion than what is said by gossip mongers.