Tribune Take: PML-N's past might haunt the party in Sindh

PML-N's historic backing of projects like Kalabagh damn will make it hard to win votes in Sindh, says Tunio.


Mahawish Rezvi December 12, 2011
Tribune Take: PML-N's past might haunt the party in Sindh

In today’s episode of the Tribune Take we take a look at Pakistan Muslim League (PML-N) chief Nawaz Sharif's latest rally in Sindh.

Hafeez Tunio, reporter The Express Tribune, says the PML-N is trying to change the perception that it is only a Punjab-centric political party by campaigning in Sindh as well.

At the rally in Larkana, the party chief said if he comes to power the first thing he will do is to arrest Benazir Bhutto’s killers. Rebuking the ruling Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP), Nawaz said that four years have passed since Benazir’s murder but her own party’s government has failed to arrest the killers.

Tunio says even with such rhetoric votes are going to be very hard to come by for the PML-N. He says since the PML-N has a history of backing mega-projects such as the Kalabagh dam, which are perceived to be anti-Sindh, Sharif will have a tough time winning seats from Sindh.

Read Hafeez Tunio’s articles here.

The Tribune Take daily news web show will appear on the tribune.com.pk home page.

The Take will feature in-depth interviews and analysis with editors and reporters who are covering the major stories, exploring front page events and major ledes. The news analysis covers the way The Express Tribune examines a story, how we cover it and why.

Correction: Kalabagh dam was spelled incorrectly in an earlier version of this article. The correction has been made.

COMMENTS (9)

Dr. Khalid | 12 years ago | Reply

nawaz sharif is still the most popular & genuine leader in pakistan. imran khan is a dwarf before him. no comparison at all!!!

Hameedullah | 12 years ago | Reply

@blithe: Lets not forget other thing which would have come by Kalabagh a dam so damned: Sindh's agriculture destroyed and people of Sindh struggling to get water even for drinking. Off course Sindh and only Sindh would have suffered. Your addition of "including Sindh" to Pakistan loses it's meaning when you mention it's advantages and "conveniently" ignore more devastating consequences.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ